Cargando…

Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: A variety of stressors throughout medical education have contributed to a burnout epidemic at both the undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) levels. In response, UGME and PGME programs have recently begun to explore resilience-based intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Chanhee, Corrado, Mario, Fournier, Karine, Bailey, Tayler, Haykal, Kay-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0
_version_ 1783645343376736256
author Seo, Chanhee
Corrado, Mario
Fournier, Karine
Bailey, Tayler
Haykal, Kay-Anne
author_facet Seo, Chanhee
Corrado, Mario
Fournier, Karine
Bailey, Tayler
Haykal, Kay-Anne
author_sort Seo, Chanhee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of stressors throughout medical education have contributed to a burnout epidemic at both the undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) levels. In response, UGME and PGME programs have recently begun to explore resilience-based interventions. As these interventions are in their infancy, little is known about their efficacy in promoting trainee resilience. This systematic review aims to synthesize the available research evidence on the efficacy of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), and Education Source from their inception to June 2020. Studies reporting the effect of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME settings were included. A qualitative analysis of the available studies was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen were single-arm studies, 6 quasi-experiments, and 2 RCTs. Thirty-eight percent (8/21; n = 598) were implemented in UGME, while 62 % (13/21, n = 778) were in PGME. There was significant heterogeneity in the duration, delivery, and curricular topics and only two studies implemented the same training model. Similarly, there was considerable variation in curricula outcome measures, with the majority reporting modest improvement in resilience, while three studies reported worsening of resilience upon completion of training. Overall assessment of risk of bias was moderate and only few curricula were previously validated by other research groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that resilience curricula may be of benefit to medical trainees. Resilience training is an emerging area of medical education that merits further investigation. Additional research is needed to construct optimal methods to foster resilience in medical education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78496192021-02-02 Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review Seo, Chanhee Corrado, Mario Fournier, Karine Bailey, Tayler Haykal, Kay-Anne BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: A variety of stressors throughout medical education have contributed to a burnout epidemic at both the undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) levels. In response, UGME and PGME programs have recently begun to explore resilience-based interventions. As these interventions are in their infancy, little is known about their efficacy in promoting trainee resilience. This systematic review aims to synthesize the available research evidence on the efficacy of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), and Education Source from their inception to June 2020. Studies reporting the effect of resilience curricula in UGME and PGME settings were included. A qualitative analysis of the available studies was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen were single-arm studies, 6 quasi-experiments, and 2 RCTs. Thirty-eight percent (8/21; n = 598) were implemented in UGME, while 62 % (13/21, n = 778) were in PGME. There was significant heterogeneity in the duration, delivery, and curricular topics and only two studies implemented the same training model. Similarly, there was considerable variation in curricula outcome measures, with the majority reporting modest improvement in resilience, while three studies reported worsening of resilience upon completion of training. Overall assessment of risk of bias was moderate and only few curricula were previously validated by other research groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that resilience curricula may be of benefit to medical trainees. Resilience training is an emerging area of medical education that merits further investigation. Additional research is needed to construct optimal methods to foster resilience in medical education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0. BioMed Central 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7849619/ /pubmed/33526019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seo, Chanhee
Corrado, Mario
Fournier, Karine
Bailey, Tayler
Haykal, Kay-Anne
Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title_full Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title_fullStr Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title_short Addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
title_sort addressing the physician burnout epidemic with resilience curricula in medical education: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02495-0
work_keys_str_mv AT seochanhee addressingthephysicianburnoutepidemicwithresiliencecurriculainmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT corradomario addressingthephysicianburnoutepidemicwithresiliencecurriculainmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT fournierkarine addressingthephysicianburnoutepidemicwithresiliencecurriculainmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT baileytayler addressingthephysicianburnoutepidemicwithresiliencecurriculainmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT haykalkayanne addressingthephysicianburnoutepidemicwithresiliencecurriculainmedicaleducationasystematicreview