Long-term outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device when comparing single- versus multicenter use

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare long-term effects of high-volume surgery at a single-center to multicenter use when using a mesh-capturing device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. METHODS: Five years after surgery 101 (88%) at the single center were compared with 164 (81.2%) in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falconer, Christian, Altman, Daniel, Poutakidis, Georgios, Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi, Mikkola, Tomi, Morcos, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
General Gynecology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05764-3

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05764-3

Ejemplares similares