Cargando…
Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118 |
_version_ | 1783647781974441984 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Paul A. Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. Beroza, Gregory C. Marone, Chris J. Hulbert, Claudia Howard, Addison Singer, Philipp Gordeev, Dmitry Karaflos, Dimosthenis Levinson, Corey J. Pfeiffer, Pascal Puk, Kin Ming Reade, Walter |
author_facet | Johnson, Paul A. Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. Beroza, Gregory C. Marone, Chris J. Hulbert, Claudia Howard, Addison Singer, Philipp Gordeev, Dmitry Karaflos, Dimosthenis Levinson, Corey J. Pfeiffer, Pascal Puk, Kin Ming Reade, Walter |
author_sort | Johnson, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage the worldwide ML community with a competition to develop and improve data analysis approaches on a forecasting problem that uses laboratory earthquake data. The competitors were tasked with predicting the time remaining before the next earthquake of successive laboratory quake events, based on only a small portion of the laboratory seismic data. The more than 4,500 participating teams created and shared more than 400 computer programs in openly accessible notebooks. Complementing the now well-known features of seismic data that map to fault criticality in the laboratory, the winning teams employed unexpected strategies based on rescaling failure times as a fraction of the seismic cycle and comparing input distribution of training and testing data. In addition to yielding scientific insights into fault processes in the laboratory and their relation with the evolution of the statistical properties of the associated seismic data, the competition serves as a pedagogical tool for teaching ML in geophysics. The approach may provide a model for other competitions in geosciences or other domains of study to help engage the ML community on problems of significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7865129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78651292021-02-17 Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition Johnson, Paul A. Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. Beroza, Gregory C. Marone, Chris J. Hulbert, Claudia Howard, Addison Singer, Philipp Gordeev, Dmitry Karaflos, Dimosthenis Levinson, Corey J. Pfeiffer, Pascal Puk, Kin Ming Reade, Walter Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage the worldwide ML community with a competition to develop and improve data analysis approaches on a forecasting problem that uses laboratory earthquake data. The competitors were tasked with predicting the time remaining before the next earthquake of successive laboratory quake events, based on only a small portion of the laboratory seismic data. The more than 4,500 participating teams created and shared more than 400 computer programs in openly accessible notebooks. Complementing the now well-known features of seismic data that map to fault criticality in the laboratory, the winning teams employed unexpected strategies based on rescaling failure times as a fraction of the seismic cycle and comparing input distribution of training and testing data. In addition to yielding scientific insights into fault processes in the laboratory and their relation with the evolution of the statistical properties of the associated seismic data, the competition serves as a pedagogical tool for teaching ML in geophysics. The approach may provide a model for other competitions in geosciences or other domains of study to help engage the ML community on problems of significance. National Academy of Sciences 2021-02-02 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7865129/ /pubmed/33495346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Johnson, Paul A. Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. Beroza, Gregory C. Marone, Chris J. Hulbert, Claudia Howard, Addison Singer, Philipp Gordeev, Dmitry Karaflos, Dimosthenis Levinson, Corey J. Pfeiffer, Pascal Puk, Kin Ming Reade, Walter Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title | Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title_full | Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title_fullStr | Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title_short | Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition |
title_sort | laboratory earthquake forecasting: a machine learning competition |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonpaula laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT rouetleducbertrand laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT pyraknoltelauraj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT berozagregoryc laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT maronechrisj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT hulbertclaudia laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT howardaddison laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT singerphilipp laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT gordeevdmitry laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT karaflosdimosthenis laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT levinsoncoreyj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT pfeifferpascal laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT pukkinming laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition AT readewalter laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition |