Cargando…

Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition

Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Paul A., Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand, Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J., Beroza, Gregory C., Marone, Chris J., Hulbert, Claudia, Howard, Addison, Singer, Philipp, Gordeev, Dmitry, Karaflos, Dimosthenis, Levinson, Corey J., Pfeiffer, Pascal, Puk, Kin Ming, Reade, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118
_version_ 1783647781974441984
author Johnson, Paul A.
Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand
Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J.
Beroza, Gregory C.
Marone, Chris J.
Hulbert, Claudia
Howard, Addison
Singer, Philipp
Gordeev, Dmitry
Karaflos, Dimosthenis
Levinson, Corey J.
Pfeiffer, Pascal
Puk, Kin Ming
Reade, Walter
author_facet Johnson, Paul A.
Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand
Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J.
Beroza, Gregory C.
Marone, Chris J.
Hulbert, Claudia
Howard, Addison
Singer, Philipp
Gordeev, Dmitry
Karaflos, Dimosthenis
Levinson, Corey J.
Pfeiffer, Pascal
Puk, Kin Ming
Reade, Walter
author_sort Johnson, Paul A.
collection PubMed
description Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage the worldwide ML community with a competition to develop and improve data analysis approaches on a forecasting problem that uses laboratory earthquake data. The competitors were tasked with predicting the time remaining before the next earthquake of successive laboratory quake events, based on only a small portion of the laboratory seismic data. The more than 4,500 participating teams created and shared more than 400 computer programs in openly accessible notebooks. Complementing the now well-known features of seismic data that map to fault criticality in the laboratory, the winning teams employed unexpected strategies based on rescaling failure times as a fraction of the seismic cycle and comparing input distribution of training and testing data. In addition to yielding scientific insights into fault processes in the laboratory and their relation with the evolution of the statistical properties of the associated seismic data, the competition serves as a pedagogical tool for teaching ML in geophysics. The approach may provide a model for other competitions in geosciences or other domains of study to help engage the ML community on problems of significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7865129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78651292021-02-17 Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition Johnson, Paul A. Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J. Beroza, Gregory C. Marone, Chris J. Hulbert, Claudia Howard, Addison Singer, Philipp Gordeev, Dmitry Karaflos, Dimosthenis Levinson, Corey J. Pfeiffer, Pascal Puk, Kin Ming Reade, Walter Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Earthquake prediction, the long-sought holy grail of earthquake science, continues to confound Earth scientists. Could we make advances by crowdsourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community? We used Google’s ML competition platform, Kaggle, to engage the worldwide ML community with a competition to develop and improve data analysis approaches on a forecasting problem that uses laboratory earthquake data. The competitors were tasked with predicting the time remaining before the next earthquake of successive laboratory quake events, based on only a small portion of the laboratory seismic data. The more than 4,500 participating teams created and shared more than 400 computer programs in openly accessible notebooks. Complementing the now well-known features of seismic data that map to fault criticality in the laboratory, the winning teams employed unexpected strategies based on rescaling failure times as a fraction of the seismic cycle and comparing input distribution of training and testing data. In addition to yielding scientific insights into fault processes in the laboratory and their relation with the evolution of the statistical properties of the associated seismic data, the competition serves as a pedagogical tool for teaching ML in geophysics. The approach may provide a model for other competitions in geosciences or other domains of study to help engage the ML community on problems of significance. National Academy of Sciences 2021-02-02 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7865129/ /pubmed/33495346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Johnson, Paul A.
Rouet-Leduc, Bertrand
Pyrak-Nolte, Laura J.
Beroza, Gregory C.
Marone, Chris J.
Hulbert, Claudia
Howard, Addison
Singer, Philipp
Gordeev, Dmitry
Karaflos, Dimosthenis
Levinson, Corey J.
Pfeiffer, Pascal
Puk, Kin Ming
Reade, Walter
Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title_full Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title_fullStr Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title_short Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition
title_sort laboratory earthquake forecasting: a machine learning competition
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7865129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33495346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011362118
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonpaula laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT rouetleducbertrand laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT pyraknoltelauraj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT berozagregoryc laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT maronechrisj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT hulbertclaudia laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT howardaddison laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT singerphilipp laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT gordeevdmitry laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT karaflosdimosthenis laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT levinsoncoreyj laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT pfeifferpascal laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT pukkinming laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition
AT readewalter laboratoryearthquakeforecastingamachinelearningcompetition