Cargando…
Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status
Developing research self-efficacy is an important part of doctoral student preparation. Despite the documented importance of research self-efficacy, little is known about the progression of doctoral students’ research self-efficacy over time in general and for students from minoritized groups. This...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617060 |
_version_ | 1783648829273276416 |
---|---|
author | Litson, Kaylee Blaney, Jennifer M. Feldon, David F. |
author_facet | Litson, Kaylee Blaney, Jennifer M. Feldon, David F. |
author_sort | Litson, Kaylee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Developing research self-efficacy is an important part of doctoral student preparation. Despite the documented importance of research self-efficacy, little is known about the progression of doctoral students’ research self-efficacy over time in general and for students from minoritized groups. This study examined both within- and between-person stability of research self-efficacy from semester to semester over 4 years, focusing on doctoral students in biological sciences (N = 336). Using random intercept autoregressive analyses, we evaluated differences in stability across gender, racially minoritized student status, and first-generation student status. Results showed similar mean levels of self-efficacy across demographic groups and across time. However, there were notable differences in between-person and within-person stability over time, specifically showing higher between-person and lower within-person stability for racially minoritized and first-generation students. These findings indicate that racially minoritized and first-generation students’ research self-efficacy reports were less consistent from semester to semester. Such results may indicate that non-minoritized and continuing-generation students’ experiences from semester to semester typically reinforce their beliefs about their own abilities related to conducting research, while such is not the case for racially minoritized nor first-generation students. Future research should examine what types of experiences impact self-efficacy development across doctoral study to offer more precise insights about factors that influence these differences in within-person stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7870493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78704932021-02-10 Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status Litson, Kaylee Blaney, Jennifer M. Feldon, David F. Front Psychol Psychology Developing research self-efficacy is an important part of doctoral student preparation. Despite the documented importance of research self-efficacy, little is known about the progression of doctoral students’ research self-efficacy over time in general and for students from minoritized groups. This study examined both within- and between-person stability of research self-efficacy from semester to semester over 4 years, focusing on doctoral students in biological sciences (N = 336). Using random intercept autoregressive analyses, we evaluated differences in stability across gender, racially minoritized student status, and first-generation student status. Results showed similar mean levels of self-efficacy across demographic groups and across time. However, there were notable differences in between-person and within-person stability over time, specifically showing higher between-person and lower within-person stability for racially minoritized and first-generation students. These findings indicate that racially minoritized and first-generation students’ research self-efficacy reports were less consistent from semester to semester. Such results may indicate that non-minoritized and continuing-generation students’ experiences from semester to semester typically reinforce their beliefs about their own abilities related to conducting research, while such is not the case for racially minoritized nor first-generation students. Future research should examine what types of experiences impact self-efficacy development across doctoral study to offer more precise insights about factors that influence these differences in within-person stability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7870493/ /pubmed/33574789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617060 Text en Copyright © 2021 Litson, Blaney and Feldon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Litson, Kaylee Blaney, Jennifer M. Feldon, David F. Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title | Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title_full | Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title_fullStr | Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title_short | Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status |
title_sort | understanding the transient nature of stem doctoral students’ research self-efficacy across time: considering the role of gender, race, and first-generation college status |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litsonkaylee understandingthetransientnatureofstemdoctoralstudentsresearchselfefficacyacrosstimeconsideringtheroleofgenderraceandfirstgenerationcollegestatus AT blaneyjenniferm understandingthetransientnatureofstemdoctoralstudentsresearchselfefficacyacrosstimeconsideringtheroleofgenderraceandfirstgenerationcollegestatus AT feldondavidf understandingthetransientnatureofstemdoctoralstudentsresearchselfefficacyacrosstimeconsideringtheroleofgenderraceandfirstgenerationcollegestatus |