Cargando…
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345 |
_version_ | 1783649746618941440 |
---|---|
author | Stenberg, Marie Mangrio, Elisabeth Bengtsson, Mariette Carlson, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Stenberg, Marie Mangrio, Elisabeth Bengtsson, Mariette Carlson, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Stenberg, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS: Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULT: The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning. CONCLUSION: Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students’ and teachers’ experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7875268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78752682021-02-18 Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review Stenberg, Marie Mangrio, Elisabeth Bengtsson, Mariette Carlson, Elisabeth BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS: Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULT: The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning. CONCLUSION: Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students’ and teachers’ experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7875268/ /pubmed/33563627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Stenberg, Marie Mangrio, Elisabeth Bengtsson, Mariette Carlson, Elisabeth Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title | Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title_full | Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title_short | Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
title_sort | formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stenbergmarie formativepeerassessmentinhigherhealthcareeducationprogrammesascopingreview AT mangrioelisabeth formativepeerassessmentinhigherhealthcareeducationprogrammesascopingreview AT bengtssonmariette formativepeerassessmentinhigherhealthcareeducationprogrammesascopingreview AT carlsonelisabeth formativepeerassessmentinhigherhealthcareeducationprogrammesascopingreview |