Cargando…

Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ariyasu, Ryo, Uchibori, Ken, Ninomiya, Hironori, Ogusu, Shinsuke, Tsugitomi, Ryosuke, Manabe, Ryo, Sakamaoto, Hiroaki, Tozuka, Takehiro, Yoshida, Hiroshi, Amino, Yoshiaki, Kitazono, Satoru, Yanagitani, Noriko, Takeuchi, Kengo, Nishio, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786
_version_ 1783651034029096960
author Ariyasu, Ryo
Uchibori, Ken
Ninomiya, Hironori
Ogusu, Shinsuke
Tsugitomi, Ryosuke
Manabe, Ryo
Sakamaoto, Hiroaki
Tozuka, Takehiro
Yoshida, Hiroshi
Amino, Yoshiaki
Kitazono, Satoru
Yanagitani, Noriko
Takeuchi, Kengo
Nishio, Makoto
author_facet Ariyasu, Ryo
Uchibori, Ken
Ninomiya, Hironori
Ogusu, Shinsuke
Tsugitomi, Ryosuke
Manabe, Ryo
Sakamaoto, Hiroaki
Tozuka, Takehiro
Yoshida, Hiroshi
Amino, Yoshiaki
Kitazono, Satoru
Yanagitani, Noriko
Takeuchi, Kengo
Nishio, Makoto
author_sort Ariyasu, Ryo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined. METHODS: Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx. RESULTS: The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT STUDY FINDINGS: The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials. The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice. To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78823782021-02-19 Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice Ariyasu, Ryo Uchibori, Ken Ninomiya, Hironori Ogusu, Shinsuke Tsugitomi, Ryosuke Manabe, Ryo Sakamaoto, Hiroaki Tozuka, Takehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Amino, Yoshiaki Kitazono, Satoru Yanagitani, Noriko Takeuchi, Kengo Nishio, Makoto Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined. METHODS: Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx. RESULTS: The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT STUDY FINDINGS: The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials. The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice. To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-12-21 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7882378/ /pubmed/33350072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ariyasu, Ryo
Uchibori, Ken
Ninomiya, Hironori
Ogusu, Shinsuke
Tsugitomi, Ryosuke
Manabe, Ryo
Sakamaoto, Hiroaki
Tozuka, Takehiro
Yoshida, Hiroshi
Amino, Yoshiaki
Kitazono, Satoru
Yanagitani, Noriko
Takeuchi, Kengo
Nishio, Makoto
Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title_full Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title_fullStr Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title_short Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
title_sort feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced nsclc in clinical practice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786
work_keys_str_mv AT ariyasuryo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT uchiboriken feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT ninomiyahironori feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT ogusushinsuke feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT tsugitomiryosuke feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT manaberyo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT sakamaotohiroaki feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT tozukatakehiro feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT yoshidahiroshi feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT aminoyoshiaki feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT kitazonosatoru feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT yanagitaninoriko feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT takeuchikengo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice
AT nishiomakoto feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice