Cargando…
Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐sma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786 |
_version_ | 1783651034029096960 |
---|---|
author | Ariyasu, Ryo Uchibori, Ken Ninomiya, Hironori Ogusu, Shinsuke Tsugitomi, Ryosuke Manabe, Ryo Sakamaoto, Hiroaki Tozuka, Takehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Amino, Yoshiaki Kitazono, Satoru Yanagitani, Noriko Takeuchi, Kengo Nishio, Makoto |
author_facet | Ariyasu, Ryo Uchibori, Ken Ninomiya, Hironori Ogusu, Shinsuke Tsugitomi, Ryosuke Manabe, Ryo Sakamaoto, Hiroaki Tozuka, Takehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Amino, Yoshiaki Kitazono, Satoru Yanagitani, Noriko Takeuchi, Kengo Nishio, Makoto |
author_sort | Ariyasu, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined. METHODS: Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx. RESULTS: The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT STUDY FINDINGS: The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials. The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice. To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7882378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78823782021-02-19 Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice Ariyasu, Ryo Uchibori, Ken Ninomiya, Hironori Ogusu, Shinsuke Tsugitomi, Ryosuke Manabe, Ryo Sakamaoto, Hiroaki Tozuka, Takehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Amino, Yoshiaki Kitazono, Satoru Yanagitani, Noriko Takeuchi, Kengo Nishio, Makoto Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined. METHODS: Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx. RESULTS: The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT STUDY FINDINGS: The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials. The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice. To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-12-21 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7882378/ /pubmed/33350072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ariyasu, Ryo Uchibori, Ken Ninomiya, Hironori Ogusu, Shinsuke Tsugitomi, Ryosuke Manabe, Ryo Sakamaoto, Hiroaki Tozuka, Takehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Amino, Yoshiaki Kitazono, Satoru Yanagitani, Noriko Takeuchi, Kengo Nishio, Makoto Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title | Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title_full | Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title_short | Feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice |
title_sort | feasibility of next‐generation sequencing test for patients with advanced nsclc in clinical practice |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ariyasuryo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT uchiboriken feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT ninomiyahironori feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT ogusushinsuke feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT tsugitomiryosuke feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT manaberyo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT sakamaotohiroaki feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT tozukatakehiro feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT yoshidahiroshi feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT aminoyoshiaki feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT kitazonosatoru feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT yanagitaninoriko feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT takeuchikengo feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice AT nishiomakoto feasibilityofnextgenerationsequencingtestforpatientswithadvancednsclcinclinicalpractice |