Cargando…

No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning

This study examined the effect of instructions and feedback on the integration of two tasks. Task-integration of covarying tasks are thought to help dual-task performance. With complete task integration of covarying dual tasks, a dual task becomes more like a single task and dual-task costs should b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ewolds, Harald, Broeker, Laura, de Oliveira, Rita F., Raab, Markus, Künzell, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01094-6
_version_ 1783651862301376512
author Ewolds, Harald
Broeker, Laura
de Oliveira, Rita F.
Raab, Markus
Künzell, Stefan
author_facet Ewolds, Harald
Broeker, Laura
de Oliveira, Rita F.
Raab, Markus
Künzell, Stefan
author_sort Ewolds, Harald
collection PubMed
description This study examined the effect of instructions and feedback on the integration of two tasks. Task-integration of covarying tasks are thought to help dual-task performance. With complete task integration of covarying dual tasks, a dual task becomes more like a single task and dual-task costs should be reduced as it is no longer conceptualized as a dual task. In the current study we tried to manipulate the extent to which tasks are integrated. We covaried a tracking task with an auditory go/no-go task and tried to manipulate the extent of task-integration by using two different sets of instructions and feedback. A group receiving task-integration promoting instructions and feedback (N = 18) and a group receiving task-separation instructions and feedback (N = 20) trained on a continuous tracking task. The tracking task covaried with the auditory go/no-go reaction time task because high-pitch sounds always occurred 250 ms before turns, which has been demonstrated to foster task integration. The tracking task further contained a repeating segment to investigate implicit learning. Results showed that instructions, feedback, or participants’ conceptualization of performing a single task versus a dual task did not significantly affect task integration. However, the covariation manipulation improved performance in both the tracking and the go/no-go task, exceeding performance in non-covarying and single tasks. We concluded that task integration between covarying motor tasks is a robust phenomenon that is not influenced by instructions or feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7886747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78867472021-03-03 No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning Ewolds, Harald Broeker, Laura de Oliveira, Rita F. Raab, Markus Künzell, Stefan Mem Cognit Article This study examined the effect of instructions and feedback on the integration of two tasks. Task-integration of covarying tasks are thought to help dual-task performance. With complete task integration of covarying dual tasks, a dual task becomes more like a single task and dual-task costs should be reduced as it is no longer conceptualized as a dual task. In the current study we tried to manipulate the extent to which tasks are integrated. We covaried a tracking task with an auditory go/no-go task and tried to manipulate the extent of task-integration by using two different sets of instructions and feedback. A group receiving task-integration promoting instructions and feedback (N = 18) and a group receiving task-separation instructions and feedback (N = 20) trained on a continuous tracking task. The tracking task covaried with the auditory go/no-go reaction time task because high-pitch sounds always occurred 250 ms before turns, which has been demonstrated to foster task integration. The tracking task further contained a repeating segment to investigate implicit learning. Results showed that instructions, feedback, or participants’ conceptualization of performing a single task versus a dual task did not significantly affect task integration. However, the covariation manipulation improved performance in both the tracking and the go/no-go task, exceeding performance in non-covarying and single tasks. We concluded that task integration between covarying motor tasks is a robust phenomenon that is not influenced by instructions or feedback. Springer US 2020-10-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7886747/ /pubmed/33033948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01094-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ewolds, Harald
Broeker, Laura
de Oliveira, Rita F.
Raab, Markus
Künzell, Stefan
No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title_full No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title_fullStr No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title_full_unstemmed No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title_short No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
title_sort no impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01094-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ewoldsharald noimpactofinstructionsandfeedbackontaskintegrationinmotorlearning
AT broekerlaura noimpactofinstructionsandfeedbackontaskintegrationinmotorlearning
AT deoliveiraritaf noimpactofinstructionsandfeedbackontaskintegrationinmotorlearning
AT raabmarkus noimpactofinstructionsandfeedbackontaskintegrationinmotorlearning
AT kunzellstefan noimpactofinstructionsandfeedbackontaskintegrationinmotorlearning