Cargando…
C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33022805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624 |
_version_ | 1783653278795431936 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Jie Sharif, Suhela Balsollier, Cyril Ruijtenbeek, Rob Pieters, Roland J. Jongkees, Seino A. K. |
author_facet | Shi, Jie Sharif, Suhela Balsollier, Cyril Ruijtenbeek, Rob Pieters, Roland J. Jongkees, Seino A. K. |
author_sort | Shi, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numerous OGT substrates have been identified, its accepted substrate scope can still be refined. We report here an attempt to better define the peptide‐recognition requirements of the OGT active site by using mRNA display, taking advantage of its extremely high throughput to assess the substrate potential of a library of all possible nonamer peptides. An antibody‐based selection process is described here that is able to enrich an OGT substrate peptide from such a library, but with poor absolute recovery. Following four rounds of selection for O‐GlcNAcylated peptides, sequencing revealed 14 peptides containing Ser/Thr, but these were shown by luminescence‐coupled assays and peptide microarray not to be OGT substrates. By contrast, subsequent testing of an N‐terminal tag approach showed exemplary recovery. Our approach demonstrates the power of genetically encoded libraries for selection of peptide substrates, even from a very low initial starting abundance and under suboptimal conditions, and emphasizes the need to consider the binding biases of antibodies and both C‐ and N‐terminal tags in profiling peptide substrates by high‐throughput display. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7894566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78945662021-03-02 C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display Shi, Jie Sharif, Suhela Balsollier, Cyril Ruijtenbeek, Rob Pieters, Roland J. Jongkees, Seino A. K. Chembiochem Communications O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numerous OGT substrates have been identified, its accepted substrate scope can still be refined. We report here an attempt to better define the peptide‐recognition requirements of the OGT active site by using mRNA display, taking advantage of its extremely high throughput to assess the substrate potential of a library of all possible nonamer peptides. An antibody‐based selection process is described here that is able to enrich an OGT substrate peptide from such a library, but with poor absolute recovery. Following four rounds of selection for O‐GlcNAcylated peptides, sequencing revealed 14 peptides containing Ser/Thr, but these were shown by luminescence‐coupled assays and peptide microarray not to be OGT substrates. By contrast, subsequent testing of an N‐terminal tag approach showed exemplary recovery. Our approach demonstrates the power of genetically encoded libraries for selection of peptide substrates, even from a very low initial starting abundance and under suboptimal conditions, and emphasizes the need to consider the binding biases of antibodies and both C‐ and N‐terminal tags in profiling peptide substrates by high‐throughput display. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-06 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7894566/ /pubmed/33022805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ChemBioChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Communications Shi, Jie Sharif, Suhela Balsollier, Cyril Ruijtenbeek, Rob Pieters, Roland J. Jongkees, Seino A. K. C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title | C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title_full | C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title_fullStr | C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title_full_unstemmed | C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title_short | C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display |
title_sort | c‐terminal tag location hampers in vitro profiling of ogt peptide substrates by mrna display |
topic | Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33022805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shijie cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay AT sharifsuhela cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay AT balsolliercyril cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay AT ruijtenbeekrob cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay AT pietersrolandj cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay AT jongkeesseinoak cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay |