Cargando…

C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display

O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Jie, Sharif, Suhela, Balsollier, Cyril, Ruijtenbeek, Rob, Pieters, Roland J., Jongkees, Seino A. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33022805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624
_version_ 1783653278795431936
author Shi, Jie
Sharif, Suhela
Balsollier, Cyril
Ruijtenbeek, Rob
Pieters, Roland J.
Jongkees, Seino A. K.
author_facet Shi, Jie
Sharif, Suhela
Balsollier, Cyril
Ruijtenbeek, Rob
Pieters, Roland J.
Jongkees, Seino A. K.
author_sort Shi, Jie
collection PubMed
description O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numerous OGT substrates have been identified, its accepted substrate scope can still be refined. We report here an attempt to better define the peptide‐recognition requirements of the OGT active site by using mRNA display, taking advantage of its extremely high throughput to assess the substrate potential of a library of all possible nonamer peptides. An antibody‐based selection process is described here that is able to enrich an OGT substrate peptide from such a library, but with poor absolute recovery. Following four rounds of selection for O‐GlcNAcylated peptides, sequencing revealed 14 peptides containing Ser/Thr, but these were shown by luminescence‐coupled assays and peptide microarray not to be OGT substrates. By contrast, subsequent testing of an N‐terminal tag approach showed exemplary recovery. Our approach demonstrates the power of genetically encoded libraries for selection of peptide substrates, even from a very low initial starting abundance and under suboptimal conditions, and emphasizes the need to consider the binding biases of antibodies and both C‐ and N‐terminal tags in profiling peptide substrates by high‐throughput display.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7894566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78945662021-03-02 C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display Shi, Jie Sharif, Suhela Balsollier, Cyril Ruijtenbeek, Rob Pieters, Roland J. Jongkees, Seino A. K. Chembiochem Communications O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the only enzyme that catalyzes the post‐translational modification of proteins at Ser/Thr with a single β‐N‐acetylglucosamine (O‐GlcNAcylation). Its activity has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease. Although numerous OGT substrates have been identified, its accepted substrate scope can still be refined. We report here an attempt to better define the peptide‐recognition requirements of the OGT active site by using mRNA display, taking advantage of its extremely high throughput to assess the substrate potential of a library of all possible nonamer peptides. An antibody‐based selection process is described here that is able to enrich an OGT substrate peptide from such a library, but with poor absolute recovery. Following four rounds of selection for O‐GlcNAcylated peptides, sequencing revealed 14 peptides containing Ser/Thr, but these were shown by luminescence‐coupled assays and peptide microarray not to be OGT substrates. By contrast, subsequent testing of an N‐terminal tag approach showed exemplary recovery. Our approach demonstrates the power of genetically encoded libraries for selection of peptide substrates, even from a very low initial starting abundance and under suboptimal conditions, and emphasizes the need to consider the binding biases of antibodies and both C‐ and N‐terminal tags in profiling peptide substrates by high‐throughput display. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-06 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7894566/ /pubmed/33022805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ChemBioChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Communications
Shi, Jie
Sharif, Suhela
Balsollier, Cyril
Ruijtenbeek, Rob
Pieters, Roland J.
Jongkees, Seino A. K.
C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title_full C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title_fullStr C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title_full_unstemmed C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title_short C‐Terminal Tag Location Hampers in Vitro Profiling of OGT Peptide Substrates by mRNA Display
title_sort c‐terminal tag location hampers in vitro profiling of ogt peptide substrates by mrna display
topic Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33022805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000624
work_keys_str_mv AT shijie cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay
AT sharifsuhela cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay
AT balsolliercyril cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay
AT ruijtenbeekrob cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay
AT pietersrolandj cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay
AT jongkeesseinoak cterminaltaglocationhampersinvitroprofilingofogtpeptidesubstratesbymrnadisplay