Cargando…
A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5 |
_version_ | 1783654980453924864 |
---|---|
author | Paulsen, Isabella W. Bzorek, Michael Olsen, Jesper Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte Troelsen, Jesper T. Pedersen, Ole B. |
author_facet | Paulsen, Isabella W. Bzorek, Michael Olsen, Jesper Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte Troelsen, Jesper T. Pedersen, Ole B. |
author_sort | Paulsen, Isabella W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervix, placenta, and hyperplastic prostate tissue were included. Tissue were fixed in 10% formalin in a range of 5–144 hours (h). Cut sections (5 μm) from the multiblock were subjected to combinations of pretreatment procedures: variable periods of proteinase K (PK) digestion or Heat-induced microRNA Retrieval (HmiRR) using target retrieval solution (TRS) pH 6.1 or 9, with or without enzymatic treatment (pepsin). Results for the overall categories: TRS pH 9 versus PK; p = 2.9e−23, TRS pH 9 versus TRS pH 6.1; p = 1.1e−14, TRS pH 6.1 versus PK; p = 2.9e−03. A long fixation time, resulted in the best microRNA preservation and staining intensity (long vs. short: p = 3.5e−47, long vs. moderate: p = 1.6e−44, moderate vs. short: p = 4.3e−16), was enhanced using HmiRR TRS pH 9 with or without pepsin providing high sensitivity and specificity. These observations conflict with other ISH techniques (e.g., messenger ribonucleic acid), which typically require shorter fixation periods, and therefore, further studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7904755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79047552021-02-25 A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes Paulsen, Isabella W. Bzorek, Michael Olsen, Jesper Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte Troelsen, Jesper T. Pedersen, Ole B. Sci Rep Article Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervix, placenta, and hyperplastic prostate tissue were included. Tissue were fixed in 10% formalin in a range of 5–144 hours (h). Cut sections (5 μm) from the multiblock were subjected to combinations of pretreatment procedures: variable periods of proteinase K (PK) digestion or Heat-induced microRNA Retrieval (HmiRR) using target retrieval solution (TRS) pH 6.1 or 9, with or without enzymatic treatment (pepsin). Results for the overall categories: TRS pH 9 versus PK; p = 2.9e−23, TRS pH 9 versus TRS pH 6.1; p = 1.1e−14, TRS pH 6.1 versus PK; p = 2.9e−03. A long fixation time, resulted in the best microRNA preservation and staining intensity (long vs. short: p = 3.5e−47, long vs. moderate: p = 1.6e−44, moderate vs. short: p = 4.3e−16), was enhanced using HmiRR TRS pH 9 with or without pepsin providing high sensitivity and specificity. These observations conflict with other ISH techniques (e.g., messenger ribonucleic acid), which typically require shorter fixation periods, and therefore, further studies are warranted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7904755/ /pubmed/33627751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Paulsen, Isabella W. Bzorek, Michael Olsen, Jesper Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte Troelsen, Jesper T. Pedersen, Ole B. A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title | A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title_full | A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title_fullStr | A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title_short | A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
title_sort | novel approach for microrna in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulsenisabellaw anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT bzorekmichael anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT olsenjesper anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT grumschwensenbirgitte anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT troelsenjespert anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT pedersenoleb anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT paulsenisabellaw novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT bzorekmichael novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT olsenjesper novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT grumschwensenbirgitte novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT troelsenjespert novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes AT pedersenoleb novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes |