Cargando…

A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes

Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulsen, Isabella W., Bzorek, Michael, Olsen, Jesper, Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte, Troelsen, Jesper T., Pedersen, Ole B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5
_version_ 1783654980453924864
author Paulsen, Isabella W.
Bzorek, Michael
Olsen, Jesper
Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte
Troelsen, Jesper T.
Pedersen, Ole B.
author_facet Paulsen, Isabella W.
Bzorek, Michael
Olsen, Jesper
Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte
Troelsen, Jesper T.
Pedersen, Ole B.
author_sort Paulsen, Isabella W.
collection PubMed
description Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervix, placenta, and hyperplastic prostate tissue were included. Tissue were fixed in 10% formalin in a range of 5–144 hours (h). Cut sections (5 μm) from the multiblock were subjected to combinations of pretreatment procedures: variable periods of proteinase K (PK) digestion or Heat-induced microRNA Retrieval (HmiRR) using target retrieval solution (TRS) pH 6.1 or 9, with or without enzymatic treatment (pepsin). Results for the overall categories: TRS pH 9 versus PK; p = 2.9e−23, TRS pH 9 versus TRS pH 6.1; p = 1.1e−14, TRS pH 6.1 versus PK; p = 2.9e−03. A long fixation time, resulted in the best microRNA preservation and staining intensity (long vs. short: p = 3.5e−47, long vs. moderate: p = 1.6e−44, moderate vs. short: p = 4.3e−16), was enhanced using HmiRR TRS pH 9 with or without pepsin providing high sensitivity and specificity. These observations conflict with other ISH techniques (e.g., messenger ribonucleic acid), which typically require shorter fixation periods, and therefore, further studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7904755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79047552021-02-25 A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes Paulsen, Isabella W. Bzorek, Michael Olsen, Jesper Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte Troelsen, Jesper T. Pedersen, Ole B. Sci Rep Article Identification of target tissue microRNAs (miR) using in situ hybridization (ISH), with digoxigenin-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes, is influenced by preanalytic parameters. To determine the best retrieval method for common microRNAs, a multiblock composed of paraffin-embedded tonsil, cervix, placenta, and hyperplastic prostate tissue were included. Tissue were fixed in 10% formalin in a range of 5–144 hours (h). Cut sections (5 μm) from the multiblock were subjected to combinations of pretreatment procedures: variable periods of proteinase K (PK) digestion or Heat-induced microRNA Retrieval (HmiRR) using target retrieval solution (TRS) pH 6.1 or 9, with or without enzymatic treatment (pepsin). Results for the overall categories: TRS pH 9 versus PK; p = 2.9e−23, TRS pH 9 versus TRS pH 6.1; p = 1.1e−14, TRS pH 6.1 versus PK; p = 2.9e−03. A long fixation time, resulted in the best microRNA preservation and staining intensity (long vs. short: p = 3.5e−47, long vs. moderate: p = 1.6e−44, moderate vs. short: p = 4.3e−16), was enhanced using HmiRR TRS pH 9 with or without pepsin providing high sensitivity and specificity. These observations conflict with other ISH techniques (e.g., messenger ribonucleic acid), which typically require shorter fixation periods, and therefore, further studies are warranted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7904755/ /pubmed/33627751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Paulsen, Isabella W.
Bzorek, Michael
Olsen, Jesper
Grum-Schwensen, Birgitte
Troelsen, Jesper T.
Pedersen, Ole B.
A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title_full A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title_fullStr A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title_full_unstemmed A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title_short A novel approach for microRNA in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
title_sort novel approach for microrna in situ hybridization using locked nucleic acid probes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83888-5
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsenisabellaw anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT bzorekmichael anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT olsenjesper anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT grumschwensenbirgitte anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT troelsenjespert anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT pedersenoleb anovelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT paulsenisabellaw novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT bzorekmichael novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT olsenjesper novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT grumschwensenbirgitte novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT troelsenjespert novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes
AT pedersenoleb novelapproachformicrornainsituhybridizationusinglockednucleicacidprobes