Cargando…

Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The processing of feed items has an impact on their nutritive properties, e.g., differences in the degree of starch gelatinization between pelleted and extruded diets are apparent. In many species, including humans, it is known that this influences the digestion process on enzymatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böswald, Linda F., Wenderlein, Jasmin, Straubinger, Reinhard K., Ulrich, Sebastian, Kienzle, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020523
_version_ 1783658682908672000
author Böswald, Linda F.
Wenderlein, Jasmin
Straubinger, Reinhard K.
Ulrich, Sebastian
Kienzle, Ellen
author_facet Böswald, Linda F.
Wenderlein, Jasmin
Straubinger, Reinhard K.
Ulrich, Sebastian
Kienzle, Ellen
author_sort Böswald, Linda F.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The processing of feed items has an impact on their nutritive properties, e.g., differences in the degree of starch gelatinization between pelleted and extruded diets are apparent. In many species, including humans, it is known that this influences the digestion process on enzymatic and microbial levels, and thus the animals´ ability to utilize the diet. Laboratory animal diets are often marketed as identical products, e.g., a standard maintenance diet, which can be purchased in pelleted or extruded form. The hypothesis that there are differences in energy and nutrient digestibility among such products, even though they are claimed to be the same diet, was investigated. The results of the digestibility trials confirm the hypothesis. Additionally, they show that even among batches of the same laboratory rodent diet in the same form, standardization is not always achieved. ABSTRACT: Starch gelatinization is a major determinant of carbohydrate digestibility and varies with diet processing. Laboratory rodent diets are often marketed as identical, but are sold in different forms, regardless of the markedly higher starch gelatinization in extruded than in pelleted diets. Our hypothesis was that this would impact energy and nutrient digestibility in mice fed pellets or extrudate, respectively. Trial 1 showed that feeding C57BL/6 mice a standard maintenance diet in extruded form results in a significantly higher digestibility of organic matter, energy, and carbohydrates than the identical diet in pelleted form. The replication of the experiment, however, revealed a variation between batches of the same pelleted diet regarding starch and total dietary fiber contents. Given the significant differences in diet digestibility and the potential impacts of digestibility on nutrient utilization, the intestinal microbiome, and intermediary metabolism, trials performed with differently processed diets are not comparable. This might partly explain failures to reproduce results, especially in gastrointestinal or microbiome research. Considering this impact on experimental animals, the degree of starch gelatinization should be declared in the diet information for laboratory animal diets. The differences between batches of laboratory animal diets as observed in the pellets are not acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7922409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79224092021-03-03 Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility Böswald, Linda F. Wenderlein, Jasmin Straubinger, Reinhard K. Ulrich, Sebastian Kienzle, Ellen Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The processing of feed items has an impact on their nutritive properties, e.g., differences in the degree of starch gelatinization between pelleted and extruded diets are apparent. In many species, including humans, it is known that this influences the digestion process on enzymatic and microbial levels, and thus the animals´ ability to utilize the diet. Laboratory animal diets are often marketed as identical products, e.g., a standard maintenance diet, which can be purchased in pelleted or extruded form. The hypothesis that there are differences in energy and nutrient digestibility among such products, even though they are claimed to be the same diet, was investigated. The results of the digestibility trials confirm the hypothesis. Additionally, they show that even among batches of the same laboratory rodent diet in the same form, standardization is not always achieved. ABSTRACT: Starch gelatinization is a major determinant of carbohydrate digestibility and varies with diet processing. Laboratory rodent diets are often marketed as identical, but are sold in different forms, regardless of the markedly higher starch gelatinization in extruded than in pelleted diets. Our hypothesis was that this would impact energy and nutrient digestibility in mice fed pellets or extrudate, respectively. Trial 1 showed that feeding C57BL/6 mice a standard maintenance diet in extruded form results in a significantly higher digestibility of organic matter, energy, and carbohydrates than the identical diet in pelleted form. The replication of the experiment, however, revealed a variation between batches of the same pelleted diet regarding starch and total dietary fiber contents. Given the significant differences in diet digestibility and the potential impacts of digestibility on nutrient utilization, the intestinal microbiome, and intermediary metabolism, trials performed with differently processed diets are not comparable. This might partly explain failures to reproduce results, especially in gastrointestinal or microbiome research. Considering this impact on experimental animals, the degree of starch gelatinization should be declared in the diet information for laboratory animal diets. The differences between batches of laboratory animal diets as observed in the pellets are not acceptable. MDPI 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7922409/ /pubmed/33671449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020523 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Böswald, Linda F.
Wenderlein, Jasmin
Straubinger, Reinhard K.
Ulrich, Sebastian
Kienzle, Ellen
Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title_full Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title_fullStr Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title_full_unstemmed Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title_short Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Energy and Nutrient Digestibility
title_sort processing matters in nutrient-matched laboratory diets for mice—energy and nutrient digestibility
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020523
work_keys_str_mv AT boswaldlindaf processingmattersinnutrientmatchedlaboratorydietsformiceenergyandnutrientdigestibility
AT wenderleinjasmin processingmattersinnutrientmatchedlaboratorydietsformiceenergyandnutrientdigestibility
AT straubingerreinhardk processingmattersinnutrientmatchedlaboratorydietsformiceenergyandnutrientdigestibility
AT ulrichsebastian processingmattersinnutrientmatchedlaboratorydietsformiceenergyandnutrientdigestibility
AT kienzleellen processingmattersinnutrientmatchedlaboratorydietsformiceenergyandnutrientdigestibility