Cargando…

Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation

EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiraci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrenk, Dieter, Bignami, Margherita, Bodin, Laurent, del Mazo, Jesús, Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina, Hogstrand, Christer, Chipman, Kevin James, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Nebbia, Carlo Stefano, Nielsen, Elsa, Ntzani, Evangelia, Petersen, Annette, Sand, Salomon, Schwerdtle, Tanja, Vleminckx, Christiane, Wallace, Heather, Martinez, Ana Gago, Gerssen, Arjen, Tubaro, Aurelia, Cascio, Claudia, Abrahantes, José  Cortiñas , Steinkellner, Hans, Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422
_version_ 1783662276216094720
author Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Chipman, Kevin James
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Martinez, Ana Gago
Gerssen, Arjen
Tubaro, Aurelia
Cascio, Claudia
Abrahantes, José  Cortiñas 
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
author_facet Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Chipman, Kevin James
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Martinez, Ana Gago
Gerssen, Arjen
Tubaro, Aurelia
Cascio, Claudia
Abrahantes, José  Cortiñas 
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
collection PubMed
description EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiracid (AZA) and the yessotoxin (YTX) groups, and five species of scallops. In addition, EFSA was asked to recommend the number of scallops in an analytical sample. To address these questions, EFSA received suitable data on the three toxin groups in two scallop species, Aequipecten opercularis and Pecten maximus, i.e. data on individual and pooled samples of edible and non‐edible parts from contamination incidents. The majority of the concentration levels were below limit of quantification (LOQ)/limit of detection (LOD), especially in adductor muscle but also in gonads. Shucking in most cases resulted in a strong decrease in the toxin levels. For Pecten maximus, statistical analysis showed that levels in whole scallops should not exceed 256 μg OA eq/kg or 217 μg AZA1 eq/kg to ensure that levels in gonads are below the regulatory limits of 160 μg OA or AZA1 eq/kg with 99% certainty. Such an analysis was not possible for yessotoxins or any toxin in Aequipecten opercularis and an assessment could only be based on upper bound levels. To ensure a 95% correct prediction on whether the level in scallops in an area or lot is correctly predicted to be compliant/non‐compliant, it was shown that 10 scallops per sample would be sufficient to predict with 95% certainty if levels of OA‐group toxins in the area/lot were 25% below or above the regulatory limit. However, to predict with a 95% certainty for levels between 140 and 180 μg OA eq/kg, a pooled sample of more than 30 scallops would have to be tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7942228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79422282021-03-16 Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Chipman, Kevin James Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Martinez, Ana Gago Gerssen, Arjen Tubaro, Aurelia Cascio, Claudia Abrahantes, José  Cortiñas  Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiracid (AZA) and the yessotoxin (YTX) groups, and five species of scallops. In addition, EFSA was asked to recommend the number of scallops in an analytical sample. To address these questions, EFSA received suitable data on the three toxin groups in two scallop species, Aequipecten opercularis and Pecten maximus, i.e. data on individual and pooled samples of edible and non‐edible parts from contamination incidents. The majority of the concentration levels were below limit of quantification (LOQ)/limit of detection (LOD), especially in adductor muscle but also in gonads. Shucking in most cases resulted in a strong decrease in the toxin levels. For Pecten maximus, statistical analysis showed that levels in whole scallops should not exceed 256 μg OA eq/kg or 217 μg AZA1 eq/kg to ensure that levels in gonads are below the regulatory limits of 160 μg OA or AZA1 eq/kg with 99% certainty. Such an analysis was not possible for yessotoxins or any toxin in Aequipecten opercularis and an assessment could only be based on upper bound levels. To ensure a 95% correct prediction on whether the level in scallops in an area or lot is correctly predicted to be compliant/non‐compliant, it was shown that 10 scallops per sample would be sufficient to predict with 95% certainty if levels of OA‐group toxins in the area/lot were 25% below or above the regulatory limit. However, to predict with a 95% certainty for levels between 140 and 180 μg OA eq/kg, a pooled sample of more than 30 scallops would have to be tested. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7942228/ /pubmed/33732388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Chipman, Kevin James
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Martinez, Ana Gago
Gerssen, Arjen
Tubaro, Aurelia
Cascio, Claudia
Abrahantes, José  Cortiñas 
Steinkellner, Hans
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title_full Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title_fullStr Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title_short Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
title_sort evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the union legislation
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422
work_keys_str_mv AT evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT schrenkdieter evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT bignamimargherita evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT bodinlaurent evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT delmazojesus evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT graslkrauppbettina evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT hogstrandchrister evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT chipmankevinjames evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT leblancjeancharles evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT nebbiacarlostefano evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT nielsenelsa evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT ntzanievangelia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT petersenannette evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT sandsalomon evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT schwerdtletanja evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT vleminckxchristiane evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT wallaceheather evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT martinezanagago evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT gerssenarjen evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT tubaroaurelia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT cascioclaudia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT abrahantesjosecortinas evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT steinkellnerhans evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation
AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation