Cargando…
Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation
EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiraci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422 |
_version_ | 1783662276216094720 |
---|---|
author | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Chipman, Kevin James Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Martinez, Ana Gago Gerssen, Arjen Tubaro, Aurelia Cascio, Claudia Abrahantes, José Cortiñas Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) |
author_facet | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Chipman, Kevin James Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Martinez, Ana Gago Gerssen, Arjen Tubaro, Aurelia Cascio, Claudia Abrahantes, José Cortiñas Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiracid (AZA) and the yessotoxin (YTX) groups, and five species of scallops. In addition, EFSA was asked to recommend the number of scallops in an analytical sample. To address these questions, EFSA received suitable data on the three toxin groups in two scallop species, Aequipecten opercularis and Pecten maximus, i.e. data on individual and pooled samples of edible and non‐edible parts from contamination incidents. The majority of the concentration levels were below limit of quantification (LOQ)/limit of detection (LOD), especially in adductor muscle but also in gonads. Shucking in most cases resulted in a strong decrease in the toxin levels. For Pecten maximus, statistical analysis showed that levels in whole scallops should not exceed 256 μg OA eq/kg or 217 μg AZA1 eq/kg to ensure that levels in gonads are below the regulatory limits of 160 μg OA or AZA1 eq/kg with 99% certainty. Such an analysis was not possible for yessotoxins or any toxin in Aequipecten opercularis and an assessment could only be based on upper bound levels. To ensure a 95% correct prediction on whether the level in scallops in an area or lot is correctly predicted to be compliant/non‐compliant, it was shown that 10 scallops per sample would be sufficient to predict with 95% certainty if levels of OA‐group toxins in the area/lot were 25% below or above the regulatory limit. However, to predict with a 95% certainty for levels between 140 and 180 μg OA eq/kg, a pooled sample of more than 30 scallops would have to be tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7942228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79422282021-03-16 Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Chipman, Kevin James Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Martinez, Ana Gago Gerssen, Arjen Tubaro, Aurelia Cascio, Claudia Abrahantes, José Cortiñas Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA was asked by the European Commission to provide information on levels of lipophilic shellfish toxins in whole scallops that would ensure levels in edible parts below the regulatory limits after shucking, i.e. removal of non‐edible parts. This should include the okadaic acid (OA), the azaspiracid (AZA) and the yessotoxin (YTX) groups, and five species of scallops. In addition, EFSA was asked to recommend the number of scallops in an analytical sample. To address these questions, EFSA received suitable data on the three toxin groups in two scallop species, Aequipecten opercularis and Pecten maximus, i.e. data on individual and pooled samples of edible and non‐edible parts from contamination incidents. The majority of the concentration levels were below limit of quantification (LOQ)/limit of detection (LOD), especially in adductor muscle but also in gonads. Shucking in most cases resulted in a strong decrease in the toxin levels. For Pecten maximus, statistical analysis showed that levels in whole scallops should not exceed 256 μg OA eq/kg or 217 μg AZA1 eq/kg to ensure that levels in gonads are below the regulatory limits of 160 μg OA or AZA1 eq/kg with 99% certainty. Such an analysis was not possible for yessotoxins or any toxin in Aequipecten opercularis and an assessment could only be based on upper bound levels. To ensure a 95% correct prediction on whether the level in scallops in an area or lot is correctly predicted to be compliant/non‐compliant, it was shown that 10 scallops per sample would be sufficient to predict with 95% certainty if levels of OA‐group toxins in the area/lot were 25% below or above the regulatory limit. However, to predict with a 95% certainty for levels between 140 and 180 μg OA eq/kg, a pooled sample of more than 30 scallops would have to be tested. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7942228/ /pubmed/33732388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Chipman, Kevin James Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Martinez, Ana Gago Gerssen, Arjen Tubaro, Aurelia Cascio, Claudia Abrahantes, José Cortiñas Steinkellner, Hans Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title | Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title_full | Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title_short | Evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the Union legislation |
title_sort | evaluation of the shucking of certain species of scallops contaminated with lipophilic toxins with a view to the production of edible parts meeting the safety requirements foreseen in the union legislation |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7942228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33732388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT schrenkdieter evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT bignamimargherita evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT bodinlaurent evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT delmazojesus evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT graslkrauppbettina evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT hogstrandchrister evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT chipmankevinjames evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT leblancjeancharles evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT nebbiacarlostefano evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT nielsenelsa evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT ntzanievangelia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT petersenannette evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT sandsalomon evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT schwerdtletanja evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT vleminckxchristiane evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT wallaceheather evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT martinezanagago evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT gerssenarjen evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT tubaroaurelia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT cascioclaudia evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT abrahantesjosecortinas evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT steinkellnerhans evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron evaluationoftheshuckingofcertainspeciesofscallopscontaminatedwithlipophilictoxinswithaviewtotheproductionofediblepartsmeetingthesafetyrequirementsforeseenintheunionlegislation |