Cargando…

Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase

O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaushik, Abhishek, Rahisuddin, R., Saini, Neha, Singh, Ravi P., Kaur, Rajveer, Koul, Sukirte, Kumaran, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490
_version_ 1783663401243770880
author Kaushik, Abhishek
Rahisuddin, R.
Saini, Neha
Singh, Ravi P.
Kaur, Rajveer
Koul, Sukirte
Kumaran, S.
author_facet Kaushik, Abhishek
Rahisuddin, R.
Saini, Neha
Singh, Ravi P.
Kaur, Rajveer
Koul, Sukirte
Kumaran, S.
author_sort Kaushik, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7948407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79484072021-03-19 Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase Kaushik, Abhishek Rahisuddin, R. Saini, Neha Singh, Ravi P. Kaur, Rajveer Koul, Sukirte Kumaran, S. J Biol Chem Research Article O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7948407/ /pubmed/33162395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaushik, Abhishek
Rahisuddin, R.
Saini, Neha
Singh, Ravi P.
Kaur, Rajveer
Koul, Sukirte
Kumaran, S.
Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title_full Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title_fullStr Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title_full_unstemmed Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title_short Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
title_sort molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490
work_keys_str_mv AT kaushikabhishek molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT rahisuddinr molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT sainineha molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT singhravip molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT kaurrajveer molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT koulsukirte molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase
AT kumarans molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase