Cargando…
Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase
O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490 |
_version_ | 1783663401243770880 |
---|---|
author | Kaushik, Abhishek Rahisuddin, R. Saini, Neha Singh, Ravi P. Kaur, Rajveer Koul, Sukirte Kumaran, S. |
author_facet | Kaushik, Abhishek Rahisuddin, R. Saini, Neha Singh, Ravi P. Kaur, Rajveer Koul, Sukirte Kumaran, S. |
author_sort | Kaushik, Abhishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7948407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79484072021-03-19 Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase Kaushik, Abhishek Rahisuddin, R. Saini, Neha Singh, Ravi P. Kaur, Rajveer Koul, Sukirte Kumaran, S. J Biol Chem Research Article O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7948407/ /pubmed/33162395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaushik, Abhishek Rahisuddin, R. Saini, Neha Singh, Ravi P. Kaur, Rajveer Koul, Sukirte Kumaran, S. Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title | Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title_full | Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title_fullStr | Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title_short | Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
title_sort | molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7948407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.014490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaushikabhishek molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT rahisuddinr molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT sainineha molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT singhravip molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT kaurrajveer molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT koulsukirte molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase AT kumarans molecularmechanismofselectivesubstrateengagementandinhibitordisengagementofcysteinesynthase |