Cargando…

Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of foam rolling (FR) and passive recovery (PR) on symptoms of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and military-specific performance. METHODS: Twenty men and women (age: 23.6 ± 4.1 years, height: 176.4 ± 5.6 cm, and body mass:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scudamore, Eric M., Sayer, Brianna L., Church, J. Brian, Bryant, Lance G., Přibyslavská, Veronika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2021.02.002
_version_ 1783666417081516032
author Scudamore, Eric M.
Sayer, Brianna L.
Church, J. Brian
Bryant, Lance G.
Přibyslavská, Veronika
author_facet Scudamore, Eric M.
Sayer, Brianna L.
Church, J. Brian
Bryant, Lance G.
Přibyslavská, Veronika
author_sort Scudamore, Eric M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of foam rolling (FR) and passive recovery (PR) on symptoms of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and military-specific performance. METHODS: Twenty men and women (age: 23.6 ± 4.1 years, height: 176.4 ± 5.6 cm, and body mass: 84.7 ± 13.4 kg) completed a DOMS-inducing exercise protocol (DIP), followed by FR or PR. Four loaded military tasks (LMT) were performed 24 h later. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured during DIP and after each LMT. Rating of muscle pain (RMP) was measured prior to the LMTs and after the recovery protocols. A repeated measure analysis of variance and partial eta squared were used to compare LMT performance across baseline, FR and PR sessions. Friedman tests compared perceptual variables across baseline, FR, and PR. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test evaluated RPE during DIP, post-DIP, and post-recovery RMP between FR and PR. RESULTS: LMT performance times were significantly faster after FR compared to PR (stair climb: p = .038, cover position sprint: p = .011, simulated ammunition can carry: p = .003, Shuttle Run: p = .034). RPE measured during LMTs was similar across all data points. Post-recovery RMP for FR (3.0 (2.3, 4.0)) and PR (4.0 (3.0, 6.0)) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: FR reduced the impact of DOMS on three loaded tactical performance tasks without significant reduction in perceived soreness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7970355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79703552021-03-29 Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery Scudamore, Eric M. Sayer, Brianna L. Church, J. Brian Bryant, Lance G. Přibyslavská, Veronika J Exerc Sci Fit Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of foam rolling (FR) and passive recovery (PR) on symptoms of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and military-specific performance. METHODS: Twenty men and women (age: 23.6 ± 4.1 years, height: 176.4 ± 5.6 cm, and body mass: 84.7 ± 13.4 kg) completed a DOMS-inducing exercise protocol (DIP), followed by FR or PR. Four loaded military tasks (LMT) were performed 24 h later. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured during DIP and after each LMT. Rating of muscle pain (RMP) was measured prior to the LMTs and after the recovery protocols. A repeated measure analysis of variance and partial eta squared were used to compare LMT performance across baseline, FR and PR sessions. Friedman tests compared perceptual variables across baseline, FR, and PR. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test evaluated RPE during DIP, post-DIP, and post-recovery RMP between FR and PR. RESULTS: LMT performance times were significantly faster after FR compared to PR (stair climb: p = .038, cover position sprint: p = .011, simulated ammunition can carry: p = .003, Shuttle Run: p = .034). RPE measured during LMTs was similar across all data points. Post-recovery RMP for FR (3.0 (2.3, 4.0)) and PR (4.0 (3.0, 6.0)) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: FR reduced the impact of DOMS on three loaded tactical performance tasks without significant reduction in perceived soreness. The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2021-07 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7970355/ /pubmed/33786041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2021.02.002 Text en © 2021 The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Scudamore, Eric M.
Sayer, Brianna L.
Church, J. Brian
Bryant, Lance G.
Přibyslavská, Veronika
Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title_full Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title_fullStr Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title_full_unstemmed Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title_short Effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
title_sort effects of foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness on loaded military task performance and perceived recovery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2021.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT scudamoreericm effectsoffoamrollingfordelayedonsetmusclesorenessonloadedmilitarytaskperformanceandperceivedrecovery
AT sayerbriannal effectsoffoamrollingfordelayedonsetmusclesorenessonloadedmilitarytaskperformanceandperceivedrecovery
AT churchjbrian effectsoffoamrollingfordelayedonsetmusclesorenessonloadedmilitarytaskperformanceandperceivedrecovery
AT bryantlanceg effectsoffoamrollingfordelayedonsetmusclesorenessonloadedmilitarytaskperformanceandperceivedrecovery
AT pribyslavskaveronika effectsoffoamrollingfordelayedonsetmusclesorenessonloadedmilitarytaskperformanceandperceivedrecovery