Cargando…

Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures

BACKGROUND: To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Maíra Anelli, Capellini, Simone Aparecida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
_version_ 1783667533387137024
author Martins, Maíra Anelli
Capellini, Simone Aparecida
author_facet Martins, Maíra Anelli
Capellini, Simone Aparecida
author_sort Martins, Maíra Anelli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile. METHOD: For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage “The Umbrella” (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1—listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2—the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3—the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention. RESULTS: Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading. CONCLUSION: It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7981338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79813382021-04-12 Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures Martins, Maíra Anelli Capellini, Simone Aparecida Psicol Reflex Crit Research BACKGROUND: To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile. METHOD: For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage “The Umbrella” (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1—listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2—the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3—the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention. RESULTS: Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading. CONCLUSION: It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7981338/ /pubmed/33743098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Martins, Maíra Anelli
Capellini, Simone Aparecida
Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title_full Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title_fullStr Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title_full_unstemmed Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title_short Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
title_sort identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsmairaanelli identificationofstrugglingreadersoratriskofreadingdifficultieswithoneminutefluencymeasures
AT capellinisimoneaparecida identificationofstrugglingreadersoratriskofreadingdifficultieswithoneminutefluencymeasures