Cargando…

A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator

This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monteiro, Jordanna S., Farage, Priscila, Zandonadi, Renata Puppin, Botelho, Raquel B. A., de Oliveira, Livia de L., Raposo, António, Shakeel, Faiyaz, Alshehri, Sultan, Mahdi, Wael A., Araújo, Wilma M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614
_version_ 1783670743098195968
author Monteiro, Jordanna S.
Farage, Priscila
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
de Oliveira, Livia de L.
Raposo, António
Shakeel, Faiyaz
Alshehri, Sultan
Mahdi, Wael A.
Araújo, Wilma M. C.
author_facet Monteiro, Jordanna S.
Farage, Priscila
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
de Oliveira, Livia de L.
Raposo, António
Shakeel, Faiyaz
Alshehri, Sultan
Mahdi, Wael A.
Araújo, Wilma M. C.
author_sort Monteiro, Jordanna S.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific volume greater than or equal to 3.5 cm(3)/g. Other parameters such as the texture profile, color (crumb and crust), and sensory analysis examined in these studies were presented. The formulations that best compensated the lack of the gluten-network were based on the combination of rice flour, rice flour with low amylose content, maize flour, rice starch, corn starch, potato starch, starch with proteins and added with transglutaminase (TGase), and hydrocolloids like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Of the 43 studies, three did not present risk of bias, and the only parameter evaluated in common in the studies was the specific volume. However, it is necessary to jointly analyze other parameters that contribute to the quality, such as texture profile, external and internal characteristics, acceptability, and useful life of the bread, especially since it is a product obtained through raw materials and unconventional ingredients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7999268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79992682021-03-28 A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator Monteiro, Jordanna S. Farage, Priscila Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Botelho, Raquel B. A. de Oliveira, Livia de L. Raposo, António Shakeel, Faiyaz Alshehri, Sultan Mahdi, Wael A. Araújo, Wilma M. C. Foods Review This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific volume greater than or equal to 3.5 cm(3)/g. Other parameters such as the texture profile, color (crumb and crust), and sensory analysis examined in these studies were presented. The formulations that best compensated the lack of the gluten-network were based on the combination of rice flour, rice flour with low amylose content, maize flour, rice starch, corn starch, potato starch, starch with proteins and added with transglutaminase (TGase), and hydrocolloids like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Of the 43 studies, three did not present risk of bias, and the only parameter evaluated in common in the studies was the specific volume. However, it is necessary to jointly analyze other parameters that contribute to the quality, such as texture profile, external and internal characteristics, acceptability, and useful life of the bread, especially since it is a product obtained through raw materials and unconventional ingredients. MDPI 2021-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7999268/ /pubmed/33805719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Review
Monteiro, Jordanna S.
Farage, Priscila
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
de Oliveira, Livia de L.
Raposo, António
Shakeel, Faiyaz
Alshehri, Sultan
Mahdi, Wael A.
Araújo, Wilma M. C.
A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title_full A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title_fullStr A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title_short A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
title_sort systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volume as a quality indicator
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614
work_keys_str_mv AT monteirojordannas asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT faragepriscila asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT zandonadirenatapuppin asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT botelhoraquelba asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT deoliveiraliviadel asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT raposoantonio asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT shakeelfaiyaz asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT alshehrisultan asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT mahdiwaela asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT araujowilmamc asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT monteirojordannas systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT faragepriscila systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT zandonadirenatapuppin systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT botelhoraquelba systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT deoliveiraliviadel systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT raposoantonio systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT shakeelfaiyaz systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT alshehrisultan systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT mahdiwaela systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator
AT araujowilmamc systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator