Cargando…
A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator
This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614 |
_version_ | 1783670743098195968 |
---|---|
author | Monteiro, Jordanna S. Farage, Priscila Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Botelho, Raquel B. A. de Oliveira, Livia de L. Raposo, António Shakeel, Faiyaz Alshehri, Sultan Mahdi, Wael A. Araújo, Wilma M. C. |
author_facet | Monteiro, Jordanna S. Farage, Priscila Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Botelho, Raquel B. A. de Oliveira, Livia de L. Raposo, António Shakeel, Faiyaz Alshehri, Sultan Mahdi, Wael A. Araújo, Wilma M. C. |
author_sort | Monteiro, Jordanna S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific volume greater than or equal to 3.5 cm(3)/g. Other parameters such as the texture profile, color (crumb and crust), and sensory analysis examined in these studies were presented. The formulations that best compensated the lack of the gluten-network were based on the combination of rice flour, rice flour with low amylose content, maize flour, rice starch, corn starch, potato starch, starch with proteins and added with transglutaminase (TGase), and hydrocolloids like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Of the 43 studies, three did not present risk of bias, and the only parameter evaluated in common in the studies was the specific volume. However, it is necessary to jointly analyze other parameters that contribute to the quality, such as texture profile, external and internal characteristics, acceptability, and useful life of the bread, especially since it is a product obtained through raw materials and unconventional ingredients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7999268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79992682021-03-28 A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator Monteiro, Jordanna S. Farage, Priscila Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Botelho, Raquel B. A. de Oliveira, Livia de L. Raposo, António Shakeel, Faiyaz Alshehri, Sultan Mahdi, Wael A. Araújo, Wilma M. C. Foods Review This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific volume greater than or equal to 3.5 cm(3)/g. Other parameters such as the texture profile, color (crumb and crust), and sensory analysis examined in these studies were presented. The formulations that best compensated the lack of the gluten-network were based on the combination of rice flour, rice flour with low amylose content, maize flour, rice starch, corn starch, potato starch, starch with proteins and added with transglutaminase (TGase), and hydrocolloids like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Of the 43 studies, three did not present risk of bias, and the only parameter evaluated in common in the studies was the specific volume. However, it is necessary to jointly analyze other parameters that contribute to the quality, such as texture profile, external and internal characteristics, acceptability, and useful life of the bread, especially since it is a product obtained through raw materials and unconventional ingredients. MDPI 2021-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7999268/ /pubmed/33805719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Review Monteiro, Jordanna S. Farage, Priscila Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Botelho, Raquel B. A. de Oliveira, Livia de L. Raposo, António Shakeel, Faiyaz Alshehri, Sultan Mahdi, Wael A. Araújo, Wilma M. C. A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title | A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title_full | A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title_short | A Systematic Review on Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Using Specific Volume as a Quality Indicator |
title_sort | systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volume as a quality indicator |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7999268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monteirojordannas asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT faragepriscila asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT zandonadirenatapuppin asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT botelhoraquelba asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT deoliveiraliviadel asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT raposoantonio asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT shakeelfaiyaz asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT alshehrisultan asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT mahdiwaela asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT araujowilmamc asystematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT monteirojordannas systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT faragepriscila systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT zandonadirenatapuppin systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT botelhoraquelba systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT deoliveiraliviadel systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT raposoantonio systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT shakeelfaiyaz systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT alshehrisultan systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT mahdiwaela systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator AT araujowilmamc systematicreviewonglutenfreebreadformulationsusingspecificvolumeasaqualityindicator |