Cargando…

Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening

Vitis vinifera ‘Nebbiolo’ is one of the most important wine grape cultivars used to produce prestigious high-quality wines known throughout the world, such as Barolo and Barbaresco. ‘Nebbiolo’ is a distinctive genotype characterized by medium/high vigor, long vegetative and ripening cycles, and limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gambino, Giorgio, Boccacci, Paolo, Pagliarani, Chiara, Perrone, Irene, Cuozzo, Danila, Mannini, Franco, Gribaudo, Ivana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063045
_version_ 1783671479717593088
author Gambino, Giorgio
Boccacci, Paolo
Pagliarani, Chiara
Perrone, Irene
Cuozzo, Danila
Mannini, Franco
Gribaudo, Ivana
author_facet Gambino, Giorgio
Boccacci, Paolo
Pagliarani, Chiara
Perrone, Irene
Cuozzo, Danila
Mannini, Franco
Gribaudo, Ivana
author_sort Gambino, Giorgio
collection PubMed
description Vitis vinifera ‘Nebbiolo’ is one of the most important wine grape cultivars used to produce prestigious high-quality wines known throughout the world, such as Barolo and Barbaresco. ‘Nebbiolo’ is a distinctive genotype characterized by medium/high vigor, long vegetative and ripening cycles, and limited berry skin color rich in 3′-hydroxylated anthocyanins. To investigate the molecular basis of these characteristics, ‘Nebbiolo’ berries collected at three different stages of ripening (berry pea size, véraison, and harvest) were compared with V. vinifera ‘Barbera’ berries, which are rich in 3′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins, using transcriptomic and analytical approaches. In two consecutive seasons, the two genotypes confirmed their characteristic anthocyanin profiles associated with a different modulation of their transcriptomes during ripening. Secondary metabolism and response to stress were the functional categories that most differentially changed between ‘Nebbiolo’ and ‘Barbera’. The profile rich in 3′-hydroxylated anthocyanins of ‘Nebbiolo’ was likely linked to a transcriptional downregulation of key genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis. In addition, at berry pea size, the defense metabolism was more active in ‘Nebbiolo’ than ‘Barbera’ in absence of biotic attacks. Accordingly, several pathogenesis-related proteins, WRKY transcription factors, and stilbene synthase genes were overexpressed in ‘Nebbiolo’, suggesting an interesting specific regulation of defense pathways in this genotype that deserves to be further explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8002507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80025072021-03-28 Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening Gambino, Giorgio Boccacci, Paolo Pagliarani, Chiara Perrone, Irene Cuozzo, Danila Mannini, Franco Gribaudo, Ivana Int J Mol Sci Article Vitis vinifera ‘Nebbiolo’ is one of the most important wine grape cultivars used to produce prestigious high-quality wines known throughout the world, such as Barolo and Barbaresco. ‘Nebbiolo’ is a distinctive genotype characterized by medium/high vigor, long vegetative and ripening cycles, and limited berry skin color rich in 3′-hydroxylated anthocyanins. To investigate the molecular basis of these characteristics, ‘Nebbiolo’ berries collected at three different stages of ripening (berry pea size, véraison, and harvest) were compared with V. vinifera ‘Barbera’ berries, which are rich in 3′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins, using transcriptomic and analytical approaches. In two consecutive seasons, the two genotypes confirmed their characteristic anthocyanin profiles associated with a different modulation of their transcriptomes during ripening. Secondary metabolism and response to stress were the functional categories that most differentially changed between ‘Nebbiolo’ and ‘Barbera’. The profile rich in 3′-hydroxylated anthocyanins of ‘Nebbiolo’ was likely linked to a transcriptional downregulation of key genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis. In addition, at berry pea size, the defense metabolism was more active in ‘Nebbiolo’ than ‘Barbera’ in absence of biotic attacks. Accordingly, several pathogenesis-related proteins, WRKY transcription factors, and stilbene synthase genes were overexpressed in ‘Nebbiolo’, suggesting an interesting specific regulation of defense pathways in this genotype that deserves to be further explored. MDPI 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8002507/ /pubmed/33802641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063045 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gambino, Giorgio
Boccacci, Paolo
Pagliarani, Chiara
Perrone, Irene
Cuozzo, Danila
Mannini, Franco
Gribaudo, Ivana
Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title_full Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title_fullStr Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title_full_unstemmed Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title_short Secondary Metabolism and Defense Responses Are Differently Regulated in Two Grapevine Cultivars during Ripening
title_sort secondary metabolism and defense responses are differently regulated in two grapevine cultivars during ripening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063045
work_keys_str_mv AT gambinogiorgio secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT boccaccipaolo secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT pagliaranichiara secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT perroneirene secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT cuozzodanila secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT manninifranco secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening
AT gribaudoivana secondarymetabolismanddefenseresponsesaredifferentlyregulatedintwograpevinecultivarsduringripening