Cargando…

Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands

Tracer development for positron emission tomography (PET) requires thorough evaluation of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dosimetry of candidate radioligands in preclinical animal studies. Since variations in pharmacokinetics and metabolism of a compound occur in different species, careful selecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Daniela, Bier, Dirk, Holschbach, Marcus, Bauer, Andreas, Neumaier, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14030277
_version_ 1783671667369705472
author Schneider, Daniela
Bier, Dirk
Holschbach, Marcus
Bauer, Andreas
Neumaier, Bernd
author_facet Schneider, Daniela
Bier, Dirk
Holschbach, Marcus
Bauer, Andreas
Neumaier, Bernd
author_sort Schneider, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Tracer development for positron emission tomography (PET) requires thorough evaluation of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dosimetry of candidate radioligands in preclinical animal studies. Since variations in pharmacokinetics and metabolism of a compound occur in different species, careful selection of a suitable model species is mandatory to obtain valid data. This study focuses on species differences in the in vitro metabolism of three xanthine-derived ligands for the A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)AR), which, in their (18)F-labeled form, can be used to image A(1)AR via PET. In vitro intrinsic clearance and metabolite profiles of 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CPFPX), an established A(1)AR-ligand, and two novel analogs, 8-cyclobutyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CBX) and 3-(3-fluoropropyl)-8-(1-methylcyclobutyl)-1-propylxanthine (MCBX), were determined in liver microsomes from humans and preclinical animal species. Molecular mechanisms leading to significant differences between human and animal metabolite profiles were also examined. The results revealed significant species differences regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of microsomal metabolism. None of the tested animal species fully matched human microsomal metabolism of the three A(1)AR ligands. In conclusion, preclinical evaluation of xanthine-derived A(1)AR ligands should employ at least two animal species, preferably rodent and dog, to predict in vivo behavior in humans. Surprisingly, rhesus macaques appear unsuitable due to large differences in metabolic activity towards the test compounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80033432021-03-28 Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands Schneider, Daniela Bier, Dirk Holschbach, Marcus Bauer, Andreas Neumaier, Bernd Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article Tracer development for positron emission tomography (PET) requires thorough evaluation of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dosimetry of candidate radioligands in preclinical animal studies. Since variations in pharmacokinetics and metabolism of a compound occur in different species, careful selection of a suitable model species is mandatory to obtain valid data. This study focuses on species differences in the in vitro metabolism of three xanthine-derived ligands for the A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)AR), which, in their (18)F-labeled form, can be used to image A(1)AR via PET. In vitro intrinsic clearance and metabolite profiles of 8-cyclopentyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CPFPX), an established A(1)AR-ligand, and two novel analogs, 8-cyclobutyl-3-(3-fluoropropyl)-1-propylxanthine (CBX) and 3-(3-fluoropropyl)-8-(1-methylcyclobutyl)-1-propylxanthine (MCBX), were determined in liver microsomes from humans and preclinical animal species. Molecular mechanisms leading to significant differences between human and animal metabolite profiles were also examined. The results revealed significant species differences regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of microsomal metabolism. None of the tested animal species fully matched human microsomal metabolism of the three A(1)AR ligands. In conclusion, preclinical evaluation of xanthine-derived A(1)AR ligands should employ at least two animal species, preferably rodent and dog, to predict in vivo behavior in humans. Surprisingly, rhesus macaques appear unsuitable due to large differences in metabolic activity towards the test compounds. MDPI 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8003343/ /pubmed/33803861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14030277 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Schneider, Daniela
Bier, Dirk
Holschbach, Marcus
Bauer, Andreas
Neumaier, Bernd
Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title_full Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title_fullStr Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title_full_unstemmed Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title_short Species Differences in Microsomal Metabolism of Xanthine-Derived A(1) Adenosine Receptor Ligands
title_sort species differences in microsomal metabolism of xanthine-derived a(1) adenosine receptor ligands
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14030277
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderdaniela speciesdifferencesinmicrosomalmetabolismofxanthinederiveda1adenosinereceptorligands
AT bierdirk speciesdifferencesinmicrosomalmetabolismofxanthinederiveda1adenosinereceptorligands
AT holschbachmarcus speciesdifferencesinmicrosomalmetabolismofxanthinederiveda1adenosinereceptorligands
AT bauerandreas speciesdifferencesinmicrosomalmetabolismofxanthinederiveda1adenosinereceptorligands
AT neumaierbernd speciesdifferencesinmicrosomalmetabolismofxanthinederiveda1adenosinereceptorligands