Cargando…
Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, me...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682 |
_version_ | 1783672079617359872 |
---|---|
author | Endrizzi, Isabella Cliceri, Danny Menghi, Leonardo Aprea, Eugenio Gasperi, Flavia |
author_facet | Endrizzi, Isabella Cliceri, Danny Menghi, Leonardo Aprea, Eugenio Gasperi, Flavia |
author_sort | Endrizzi, Isabella |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, mean age 41 years) were asked to evaluate their overall liking on a 9-point hedonic scale of four samples: Cheeses P and S were presented twice with different information about the origin of the milk (cows grazing on mountain pasture or reared in a valley floor stall). Demographics, consumer habits, and opinions on mountain pasture practice (MPP), attitudes towards sustainability, and food-related behaviours (i.e., diet, food waste production, organic food, and zero food miles products purchase) were recorded and used to segment consumers. The cheeses were all considered more than acceptable, even though they were found to be significantly different in colour and texture by instrumental analyses. In the whole consumer panel, the cheese P was preferred, while in consumer segments less attentive to product characteristics, this effect was not significant. External information had a strong effect: Overall liking was significantly higher in cheeses presented as “mountain pasture product”, both in the whole panel and in consumer segments with different attitudes (except for those with a low opinion of MPP). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8005200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80052002021-03-29 Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? Endrizzi, Isabella Cliceri, Danny Menghi, Leonardo Aprea, Eugenio Gasperi, Flavia Foods Article This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, mean age 41 years) were asked to evaluate their overall liking on a 9-point hedonic scale of four samples: Cheeses P and S were presented twice with different information about the origin of the milk (cows grazing on mountain pasture or reared in a valley floor stall). Demographics, consumer habits, and opinions on mountain pasture practice (MPP), attitudes towards sustainability, and food-related behaviours (i.e., diet, food waste production, organic food, and zero food miles products purchase) were recorded and used to segment consumers. The cheeses were all considered more than acceptable, even though they were found to be significantly different in colour and texture by instrumental analyses. In the whole consumer panel, the cheese P was preferred, while in consumer segments less attentive to product characteristics, this effect was not significant. External information had a strong effect: Overall liking was significantly higher in cheeses presented as “mountain pasture product”, both in the whole panel and in consumer segments with different attitudes (except for those with a low opinion of MPP). MDPI 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8005200/ /pubmed/33806965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Endrizzi, Isabella Cliceri, Danny Menghi, Leonardo Aprea, Eugenio Gasperi, Flavia Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title | Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title_full | Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title_fullStr | Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title_short | Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? |
title_sort | does the ‘mountain pasture product’ claim affect local cheese acceptability? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT endrizziisabella doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability AT cliceridanny doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability AT menghileonardo doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability AT apreaeugenio doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability AT gasperiflavia doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability |