Cargando…

Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?

This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endrizzi, Isabella, Cliceri, Danny, Menghi, Leonardo, Aprea, Eugenio, Gasperi, Flavia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682
_version_ 1783672079617359872
author Endrizzi, Isabella
Cliceri, Danny
Menghi, Leonardo
Aprea, Eugenio
Gasperi, Flavia
author_facet Endrizzi, Isabella
Cliceri, Danny
Menghi, Leonardo
Aprea, Eugenio
Gasperi, Flavia
author_sort Endrizzi, Isabella
collection PubMed
description This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, mean age 41 years) were asked to evaluate their overall liking on a 9-point hedonic scale of four samples: Cheeses P and S were presented twice with different information about the origin of the milk (cows grazing on mountain pasture or reared in a valley floor stall). Demographics, consumer habits, and opinions on mountain pasture practice (MPP), attitudes towards sustainability, and food-related behaviours (i.e., diet, food waste production, organic food, and zero food miles products purchase) were recorded and used to segment consumers. The cheeses were all considered more than acceptable, even though they were found to be significantly different in colour and texture by instrumental analyses. In the whole consumer panel, the cheese P was preferred, while in consumer segments less attentive to product characteristics, this effect was not significant. External information had a strong effect: Overall liking was significantly higher in cheeses presented as “mountain pasture product”, both in the whole panel and in consumer segments with different attitudes (except for those with a low opinion of MPP).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8005200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80052002021-03-29 Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability? Endrizzi, Isabella Cliceri, Danny Menghi, Leonardo Aprea, Eugenio Gasperi, Flavia Foods Article This paper aims to explore the impact of “mountain pasture product” information on the acceptability of local protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced from the raw milk of cows grazing in mountain pastures (P) or reared in valley floor stalls (S). A total of 156 consumers (55% males, mean age 41 years) were asked to evaluate their overall liking on a 9-point hedonic scale of four samples: Cheeses P and S were presented twice with different information about the origin of the milk (cows grazing on mountain pasture or reared in a valley floor stall). Demographics, consumer habits, and opinions on mountain pasture practice (MPP), attitudes towards sustainability, and food-related behaviours (i.e., diet, food waste production, organic food, and zero food miles products purchase) were recorded and used to segment consumers. The cheeses were all considered more than acceptable, even though they were found to be significantly different in colour and texture by instrumental analyses. In the whole consumer panel, the cheese P was preferred, while in consumer segments less attentive to product characteristics, this effect was not significant. External information had a strong effect: Overall liking was significantly higher in cheeses presented as “mountain pasture product”, both in the whole panel and in consumer segments with different attitudes (except for those with a low opinion of MPP). MDPI 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8005200/ /pubmed/33806965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Endrizzi, Isabella
Cliceri, Danny
Menghi, Leonardo
Aprea, Eugenio
Gasperi, Flavia
Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title_full Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title_fullStr Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title_full_unstemmed Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title_short Does the ‘Mountain Pasture Product’ Claim Affect Local Cheese Acceptability?
title_sort does the ‘mountain pasture product’ claim affect local cheese acceptability?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10030682
work_keys_str_mv AT endrizziisabella doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability
AT cliceridanny doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability
AT menghileonardo doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability
AT apreaeugenio doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability
AT gasperiflavia doesthemountainpastureproductclaimaffectlocalcheeseacceptability