Cargando…

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses

BACKGROUND: The values and attitudes of healthcare professionals influence their handling of ‘do-not-attempt-resuscitation’ (DNAR) orders. The aim of this study was a) to describe attitudes, perceptions and practices among Swedish physicians and nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bremer, Anders, Årestedt, Kristofer, Rosengren, Ewa, Carlsson, Jörg, Sandboge, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8
_version_ 1783672717689487360
author Bremer, Anders
Årestedt, Kristofer
Rosengren, Ewa
Carlsson, Jörg
Sandboge, Samuel
author_facet Bremer, Anders
Årestedt, Kristofer
Rosengren, Ewa
Carlsson, Jörg
Sandboge, Samuel
author_sort Bremer, Anders
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The values and attitudes of healthcare professionals influence their handling of ‘do-not-attempt-resuscitation’ (DNAR) orders. The aim of this study was a) to describe attitudes, perceptions and practices among Swedish physicians and nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and DNAR orders with patients and their relatives, and b) to investigate if the physicians and nurses were familiar with the national ethical guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study based on a questionnaire and was conducted at 19 wards in two regional hospitals and one county hospital. RESULTS: 210 physicians and 312 nurses (n = 522) responded to the questionnaire. Every third (35%) professional had read the guidelines with a lower proportion of physicians (29%) compared to nurses (38%). Around 40% of patients had the opportunity or ability to participate in the DNAR discussion. The DNAR decision was discussed with 38% of patients and the prognosis with 46%. Of the patients who were considered to have the ability to participate in the discussion, 79% did so. The majority (81%) of physicians and nurses believed that patients should always be asked about their preferences before a DNAR decision was made. CONCLUSIONS: Swedish healthcare professionals take a patient’s autonomy into account regarding DNAR decisions. Nevertheless, as 50% of patients were considered unable to participate in the DNAR discussion, questions remain about the timing of patient participation and whether more discussions could have been conducted earlier. Given the uncertainty about timing, the majority of patients deemed competent participated in DNAR discussions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80085842021-03-30 Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses Bremer, Anders Årestedt, Kristofer Rosengren, Ewa Carlsson, Jörg Sandboge, Samuel BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The values and attitudes of healthcare professionals influence their handling of ‘do-not-attempt-resuscitation’ (DNAR) orders. The aim of this study was a) to describe attitudes, perceptions and practices among Swedish physicians and nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and DNAR orders with patients and their relatives, and b) to investigate if the physicians and nurses were familiar with the national ethical guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study based on a questionnaire and was conducted at 19 wards in two regional hospitals and one county hospital. RESULTS: 210 physicians and 312 nurses (n = 522) responded to the questionnaire. Every third (35%) professional had read the guidelines with a lower proportion of physicians (29%) compared to nurses (38%). Around 40% of patients had the opportunity or ability to participate in the DNAR discussion. The DNAR decision was discussed with 38% of patients and the prognosis with 46%. Of the patients who were considered to have the ability to participate in the discussion, 79% did so. The majority (81%) of physicians and nurses believed that patients should always be asked about their preferences before a DNAR decision was made. CONCLUSIONS: Swedish healthcare professionals take a patient’s autonomy into account regarding DNAR decisions. Nevertheless, as 50% of patients were considered unable to participate in the DNAR discussion, questions remain about the timing of patient participation and whether more discussions could have been conducted earlier. Given the uncertainty about timing, the majority of patients deemed competent participated in DNAR discussions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8008584/ /pubmed/33785001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bremer, Anders
Årestedt, Kristofer
Rosengren, Ewa
Carlsson, Jörg
Sandboge, Samuel
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title_full Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title_fullStr Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title_full_unstemmed Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title_short Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses
title_sort do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of swedish physicians and nurses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00604-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bremeranders donotattemptresuscitationordersattitudesperceptionsandpracticesofswedishphysiciansandnurses
AT arestedtkristofer donotattemptresuscitationordersattitudesperceptionsandpracticesofswedishphysiciansandnurses
AT rosengrenewa donotattemptresuscitationordersattitudesperceptionsandpracticesofswedishphysiciansandnurses
AT carlssonjorg donotattemptresuscitationordersattitudesperceptionsandpracticesofswedishphysiciansandnurses
AT sandbogesamuel donotattemptresuscitationordersattitudesperceptionsandpracticesofswedishphysiciansandnurses