A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man

Background and purpose — Registries report high revision rates after unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) due, in part, to aseptic loosing. In an attempt to improve Oxford UKR femoral component fixation a new design was introduced with a Twin rather than a Single peg. We used the National Joint R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad, Hasan R, Matharu, Gulraj S, Judge, Andrew, Murray, David W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1748288

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1748288

Ejemplares similares