Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497 |
_version_ | 1783677260221382656 |
---|---|
author | Palles, Claire Fotheringham, Susan Chegwidden, Laura Lucas, Marie Kerr, Rachel Mozolowski, Guy Rosmarin, Dan Taylor, Jenny C. Tomlinson, Ian Kerr, David |
author_facet | Palles, Claire Fotheringham, Susan Chegwidden, Laura Lucas, Marie Kerr, Rachel Mozolowski, Guy Rosmarin, Dan Taylor, Jenny C. Tomlinson, Ian Kerr, David |
author_sort | Palles, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do not clear 5-FU very well. This causes active drug to stay in the body too long, causing toxicities such as diarrhoea or low levels of blood cells important for fighting infections. Current guidelines identify four sequence changes in the gene that encodes DPD with high level evidence of an impact on protein activity. Our study aims to calculate the frequency of a set of variants identified in patients with DPD deficiency in patients that were part of a clinical trial called QUASAR 2. We go on to test how well the DPD deficiency variants and a set of common variants previously shown to be associated with 5-FU toxicity can predict a person’s risk of 5-Fluorouracil induced toxicity. Our research is important for working out the best way to identify patients at risk of toxicity so high risk patients can be given lower doses of 5-Fluorouracil or be treated with a different drug all together. ABSTRACT: Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is limited by significant toxicity. Tests based upon variants in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines with high level evidence of a link to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotype and 5-FU toxicity are available to identify patients at high risk of severe adverse events (AEs). We previously reported associations between rs1213215, rs2612091, and NM_000110.3:c.1906-14763G>A (rs12022243) and capecitabine induced toxicity in clinical trial QUASAR 2. We also identified patients with DPD deficiency alleles NM_000110.3: c.1905+1G>A, NM_000110.3: c.2846C>T, NM_000110.3:c.1679T>G and NM_000110.3:c.1651G>A. We have now assessed the frequency of thirteen additional DPYD deficiency variants in 888 patients from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC)—a measure of diagnostic accuracy—of the high-level evidence variants from the CPIC guidelines plus and minus additional DPYD deficiency variants and or common variants associated with 5-FU toxicity. Including additional DPYD deficiency variants retained good diagnostic accuracy for serious adverse events (AEs) and improved sensitivity for predicting grade 4 haematological toxicities (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.94) but the improvement in AUC for this toxicity was not significant. Larger datasets will be required to determine the benefit of including additional DPYD deficiency variants not observed here. Genotyping two common alleles statistically significantly improves AUC for prediction of risk of HFS and may be clinically useful (AUC difference 0.177, sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.31). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8037940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80379402021-04-12 An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities Palles, Claire Fotheringham, Susan Chegwidden, Laura Lucas, Marie Kerr, Rachel Mozolowski, Guy Rosmarin, Dan Taylor, Jenny C. Tomlinson, Ian Kerr, David Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do not clear 5-FU very well. This causes active drug to stay in the body too long, causing toxicities such as diarrhoea or low levels of blood cells important for fighting infections. Current guidelines identify four sequence changes in the gene that encodes DPD with high level evidence of an impact on protein activity. Our study aims to calculate the frequency of a set of variants identified in patients with DPD deficiency in patients that were part of a clinical trial called QUASAR 2. We go on to test how well the DPD deficiency variants and a set of common variants previously shown to be associated with 5-FU toxicity can predict a person’s risk of 5-Fluorouracil induced toxicity. Our research is important for working out the best way to identify patients at risk of toxicity so high risk patients can be given lower doses of 5-Fluorouracil or be treated with a different drug all together. ABSTRACT: Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is limited by significant toxicity. Tests based upon variants in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines with high level evidence of a link to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotype and 5-FU toxicity are available to identify patients at high risk of severe adverse events (AEs). We previously reported associations between rs1213215, rs2612091, and NM_000110.3:c.1906-14763G>A (rs12022243) and capecitabine induced toxicity in clinical trial QUASAR 2. We also identified patients with DPD deficiency alleles NM_000110.3: c.1905+1G>A, NM_000110.3: c.2846C>T, NM_000110.3:c.1679T>G and NM_000110.3:c.1651G>A. We have now assessed the frequency of thirteen additional DPYD deficiency variants in 888 patients from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC)—a measure of diagnostic accuracy—of the high-level evidence variants from the CPIC guidelines plus and minus additional DPYD deficiency variants and or common variants associated with 5-FU toxicity. Including additional DPYD deficiency variants retained good diagnostic accuracy for serious adverse events (AEs) and improved sensitivity for predicting grade 4 haematological toxicities (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.94) but the improvement in AUC for this toxicity was not significant. Larger datasets will be required to determine the benefit of including additional DPYD deficiency variants not observed here. Genotyping two common alleles statistically significantly improves AUC for prediction of risk of HFS and may be clinically useful (AUC difference 0.177, sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.31). MDPI 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8037940/ /pubmed/33805100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Palles, Claire Fotheringham, Susan Chegwidden, Laura Lucas, Marie Kerr, Rachel Mozolowski, Guy Rosmarin, Dan Taylor, Jenny C. Tomlinson, Ian Kerr, David An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title | An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities |
title_sort | evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of variants in dpyd and a single variant in enosf1 for predicting common capecitabine related toxicities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pallesclaire anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT fotheringhamsusan anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT chegwiddenlaura anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT lucasmarie anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT kerrrachel anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT mozolowskiguy anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT rosmarindan anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT taylorjennyc anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT tomlinsonian anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT kerrdavid anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT pallesclaire evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT fotheringhamsusan evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT chegwiddenlaura evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT lucasmarie evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT kerrrachel evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT mozolowskiguy evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT rosmarindan evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT taylorjennyc evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT tomlinsonian evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities AT kerrdavid evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities |