Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities

SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palles, Claire, Fotheringham, Susan, Chegwidden, Laura, Lucas, Marie, Kerr, Rachel, Mozolowski, Guy, Rosmarin, Dan, Taylor, Jenny C., Tomlinson, Ian, Kerr, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497
_version_ 1783677260221382656
author Palles, Claire
Fotheringham, Susan
Chegwidden, Laura
Lucas, Marie
Kerr, Rachel
Mozolowski, Guy
Rosmarin, Dan
Taylor, Jenny C.
Tomlinson, Ian
Kerr, David
author_facet Palles, Claire
Fotheringham, Susan
Chegwidden, Laura
Lucas, Marie
Kerr, Rachel
Mozolowski, Guy
Rosmarin, Dan
Taylor, Jenny C.
Tomlinson, Ian
Kerr, David
author_sort Palles, Claire
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do not clear 5-FU very well. This causes active drug to stay in the body too long, causing toxicities such as diarrhoea or low levels of blood cells important for fighting infections. Current guidelines identify four sequence changes in the gene that encodes DPD with high level evidence of an impact on protein activity. Our study aims to calculate the frequency of a set of variants identified in patients with DPD deficiency in patients that were part of a clinical trial called QUASAR 2. We go on to test how well the DPD deficiency variants and a set of common variants previously shown to be associated with 5-FU toxicity can predict a person’s risk of 5-Fluorouracil induced toxicity. Our research is important for working out the best way to identify patients at risk of toxicity so high risk patients can be given lower doses of 5-Fluorouracil or be treated with a different drug all together. ABSTRACT: Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is limited by significant toxicity. Tests based upon variants in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines with high level evidence of a link to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotype and 5-FU toxicity are available to identify patients at high risk of severe adverse events (AEs). We previously reported associations between rs1213215, rs2612091, and NM_000110.3:c.1906-14763G>A (rs12022243) and capecitabine induced toxicity in clinical trial QUASAR 2. We also identified patients with DPD deficiency alleles NM_000110.3: c.1905+1G>A, NM_000110.3: c.2846C>T, NM_000110.3:c.1679T>G and NM_000110.3:c.1651G>A. We have now assessed the frequency of thirteen additional DPYD deficiency variants in 888 patients from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC)—a measure of diagnostic accuracy—of the high-level evidence variants from the CPIC guidelines plus and minus additional DPYD deficiency variants and or common variants associated with 5-FU toxicity. Including additional DPYD deficiency variants retained good diagnostic accuracy for serious adverse events (AEs) and improved sensitivity for predicting grade 4 haematological toxicities (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.94) but the improvement in AUC for this toxicity was not significant. Larger datasets will be required to determine the benefit of including additional DPYD deficiency variants not observed here. Genotyping two common alleles statistically significantly improves AUC for prediction of risk of HFS and may be clinically useful (AUC difference 0.177, sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.31).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8037940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80379402021-04-12 An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities Palles, Claire Fotheringham, Susan Chegwidden, Laura Lucas, Marie Kerr, Rachel Mozolowski, Guy Rosmarin, Dan Taylor, Jenny C. Tomlinson, Ian Kerr, David Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy drug that can cause severe toxicity in some patients. A protein, an action molecule in our cells, called dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or DPD for short, is important in clearing 5-FU from the body. Some people have versions of DPD that do not clear 5-FU very well. This causes active drug to stay in the body too long, causing toxicities such as diarrhoea or low levels of blood cells important for fighting infections. Current guidelines identify four sequence changes in the gene that encodes DPD with high level evidence of an impact on protein activity. Our study aims to calculate the frequency of a set of variants identified in patients with DPD deficiency in patients that were part of a clinical trial called QUASAR 2. We go on to test how well the DPD deficiency variants and a set of common variants previously shown to be associated with 5-FU toxicity can predict a person’s risk of 5-Fluorouracil induced toxicity. Our research is important for working out the best way to identify patients at risk of toxicity so high risk patients can be given lower doses of 5-Fluorouracil or be treated with a different drug all together. ABSTRACT: Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is limited by significant toxicity. Tests based upon variants in the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines with high level evidence of a link to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotype and 5-FU toxicity are available to identify patients at high risk of severe adverse events (AEs). We previously reported associations between rs1213215, rs2612091, and NM_000110.3:c.1906-14763G>A (rs12022243) and capecitabine induced toxicity in clinical trial QUASAR 2. We also identified patients with DPD deficiency alleles NM_000110.3: c.1905+1G>A, NM_000110.3: c.2846C>T, NM_000110.3:c.1679T>G and NM_000110.3:c.1651G>A. We have now assessed the frequency of thirteen additional DPYD deficiency variants in 888 patients from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC)—a measure of diagnostic accuracy—of the high-level evidence variants from the CPIC guidelines plus and minus additional DPYD deficiency variants and or common variants associated with 5-FU toxicity. Including additional DPYD deficiency variants retained good diagnostic accuracy for serious adverse events (AEs) and improved sensitivity for predicting grade 4 haematological toxicities (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.94) but the improvement in AUC for this toxicity was not significant. Larger datasets will be required to determine the benefit of including additional DPYD deficiency variants not observed here. Genotyping two common alleles statistically significantly improves AUC for prediction of risk of HFS and may be clinically useful (AUC difference 0.177, sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.31). MDPI 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8037940/ /pubmed/33805100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Palles, Claire
Fotheringham, Susan
Chegwidden, Laura
Lucas, Marie
Kerr, Rachel
Mozolowski, Guy
Rosmarin, Dan
Taylor, Jenny C.
Tomlinson, Ian
Kerr, David
An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title_full An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title_short An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Variants in DPYD and a Single Variant in ENOSF1 for Predicting Common Capecitabine Related Toxicities
title_sort evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of variants in dpyd and a single variant in enosf1 for predicting common capecitabine related toxicities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071497
work_keys_str_mv AT pallesclaire anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT fotheringhamsusan anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT chegwiddenlaura anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT lucasmarie anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT kerrrachel anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT mozolowskiguy anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT rosmarindan anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT taylorjennyc anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT tomlinsonian anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT kerrdavid anevaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT pallesclaire evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT fotheringhamsusan evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT chegwiddenlaura evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT lucasmarie evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT kerrrachel evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT mozolowskiguy evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT rosmarindan evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT taylorjennyc evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT tomlinsonian evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities
AT kerrdavid evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyofapanelofvariantsindpydandasinglevariantinenosf1forpredictingcommoncapecitabinerelatedtoxicities