Cargando…

Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis

BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah Unive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazemi Karyan, Ali, Rezaei, Satar, Etesami, Shokooh, Pezhman, Leyla, Matin, Behzad Karami, Delavari, Sajad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084829
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20
_version_ 1783680786795331584
author Kazemi Karyan, Ali
Rezaei, Satar
Etesami, Shokooh
Pezhman, Leyla
Matin, Behzad Karami
Delavari, Sajad
author_facet Kazemi Karyan, Ali
Rezaei, Satar
Etesami, Shokooh
Pezhman, Leyla
Matin, Behzad Karami
Delavari, Sajad
author_sort Kazemi Karyan, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) method used for eliciting preferences of participants of the study. A narrative literature review and interview with eight professors and ten students conducted to determine attributes and levels of evaluation methods in the university. Furthermore, experimental design used for making final choice sets of the evaluation methods. We included 213 students and 30 professors in the study. Conditional logistic regression model performed to data analysis. RESULTS: Most of the professors (36.67%) preferred to allocate up to 30% of evolution scores to midterm examination. However, the most percentage of students (30.45%) were agree to include midterm examination up to 15% of total scores. The majority of students prefer to examination questions compromise just presented materials, while 70% of professors prefer to include additional texts for evaluation examinations. In case of quiz examination, professors in comparison with students prefer that quiz should have higher proportion of total scores. DCE analysis indicated that professors and students preferred a mix of questions in examinations. In addition, additional resources beyond what is taught in class made utility for professors and disutility for students. Quiz, also, increased the utility of an evaluation package in professors. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that there is a gap between preferences of professors and students regarding some attributes of evaluation methods such as student's discipline, examination materials, and quiz. Further studies are needed to examining other attributes of evaluation methods in theatrical and practical courses in Iran and other contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80571752021-06-02 Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis Kazemi Karyan, Ali Rezaei, Satar Etesami, Shokooh Pezhman, Leyla Matin, Behzad Karami Delavari, Sajad J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) method used for eliciting preferences of participants of the study. A narrative literature review and interview with eight professors and ten students conducted to determine attributes and levels of evaluation methods in the university. Furthermore, experimental design used for making final choice sets of the evaluation methods. We included 213 students and 30 professors in the study. Conditional logistic regression model performed to data analysis. RESULTS: Most of the professors (36.67%) preferred to allocate up to 30% of evolution scores to midterm examination. However, the most percentage of students (30.45%) were agree to include midterm examination up to 15% of total scores. The majority of students prefer to examination questions compromise just presented materials, while 70% of professors prefer to include additional texts for evaluation examinations. In case of quiz examination, professors in comparison with students prefer that quiz should have higher proportion of total scores. DCE analysis indicated that professors and students preferred a mix of questions in examinations. In addition, additional resources beyond what is taught in class made utility for professors and disutility for students. Quiz, also, increased the utility of an evaluation package in professors. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that there is a gap between preferences of professors and students regarding some attributes of evaluation methods such as student's discipline, examination materials, and quiz. Further studies are needed to examining other attributes of evaluation methods in theatrical and practical courses in Iran and other contexts. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8057175/ /pubmed/34084829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kazemi Karyan, Ali
Rezaei, Satar
Etesami, Shokooh
Pezhman, Leyla
Matin, Behzad Karami
Delavari, Sajad
Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title_full Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title_fullStr Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title_full_unstemmed Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title_short Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
title_sort eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: an application of discrete choice experiment analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084829
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kazemikaryanali elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis
AT rezaeisatar elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis
AT etesamishokooh elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis
AT pezhmanleyla elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis
AT matinbehzadkarami elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis
AT delavarisajad elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis