Cargando…
Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis
BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah Unive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20 |
_version_ | 1783680786795331584 |
---|---|
author | Kazemi Karyan, Ali Rezaei, Satar Etesami, Shokooh Pezhman, Leyla Matin, Behzad Karami Delavari, Sajad |
author_facet | Kazemi Karyan, Ali Rezaei, Satar Etesami, Shokooh Pezhman, Leyla Matin, Behzad Karami Delavari, Sajad |
author_sort | Kazemi Karyan, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) method used for eliciting preferences of participants of the study. A narrative literature review and interview with eight professors and ten students conducted to determine attributes and levels of evaluation methods in the university. Furthermore, experimental design used for making final choice sets of the evaluation methods. We included 213 students and 30 professors in the study. Conditional logistic regression model performed to data analysis. RESULTS: Most of the professors (36.67%) preferred to allocate up to 30% of evolution scores to midterm examination. However, the most percentage of students (30.45%) were agree to include midterm examination up to 15% of total scores. The majority of students prefer to examination questions compromise just presented materials, while 70% of professors prefer to include additional texts for evaluation examinations. In case of quiz examination, professors in comparison with students prefer that quiz should have higher proportion of total scores. DCE analysis indicated that professors and students preferred a mix of questions in examinations. In addition, additional resources beyond what is taught in class made utility for professors and disutility for students. Quiz, also, increased the utility of an evaluation package in professors. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that there is a gap between preferences of professors and students regarding some attributes of evaluation methods such as student's discipline, examination materials, and quiz. Further studies are needed to examining other attributes of evaluation methods in theatrical and practical courses in Iran and other contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8057175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80571752021-06-02 Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis Kazemi Karyan, Ali Rezaei, Satar Etesami, Shokooh Pezhman, Leyla Matin, Behzad Karami Delavari, Sajad J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation has become an inseparable part of education process which gives feedback to students and professors to improve education quality. This study aimed to elicit preferences of professors and students about attributes of evaluation methods in theoretical courses in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) method used for eliciting preferences of participants of the study. A narrative literature review and interview with eight professors and ten students conducted to determine attributes and levels of evaluation methods in the university. Furthermore, experimental design used for making final choice sets of the evaluation methods. We included 213 students and 30 professors in the study. Conditional logistic regression model performed to data analysis. RESULTS: Most of the professors (36.67%) preferred to allocate up to 30% of evolution scores to midterm examination. However, the most percentage of students (30.45%) were agree to include midterm examination up to 15% of total scores. The majority of students prefer to examination questions compromise just presented materials, while 70% of professors prefer to include additional texts for evaluation examinations. In case of quiz examination, professors in comparison with students prefer that quiz should have higher proportion of total scores. DCE analysis indicated that professors and students preferred a mix of questions in examinations. In addition, additional resources beyond what is taught in class made utility for professors and disutility for students. Quiz, also, increased the utility of an evaluation package in professors. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that there is a gap between preferences of professors and students regarding some attributes of evaluation methods such as student's discipline, examination materials, and quiz. Further studies are needed to examining other attributes of evaluation methods in theatrical and practical courses in Iran and other contexts. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8057175/ /pubmed/34084829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kazemi Karyan, Ali Rezaei, Satar Etesami, Shokooh Pezhman, Leyla Matin, Behzad Karami Delavari, Sajad Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title | Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title_full | Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title_fullStr | Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title_short | Eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: An application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
title_sort | eliciting preferences of professors and medical group students for evaluation methods of theoretical courses: an application of discrete choice experiment analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084829 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_540_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazemikaryanali elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis AT rezaeisatar elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis AT etesamishokooh elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis AT pezhmanleyla elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis AT matinbehzadkarami elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis AT delavarisajad elicitingpreferencesofprofessorsandmedicalgroupstudentsforevaluationmethodsoftheoreticalcoursesanapplicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentanalysis |