Cargando…

Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences

Co-production affords an intervention’s target population the opportunity to participate in intervention theory decision-making during the development process. This addresses the over-reliance on developing interventions through academic theories which can be devoid of contextual understanding and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Hayley, Couturiaux, Danielle, Davis, Marianne, Edwards, Amy, Janes, Edward, Kim, Hyun Sue, Melendez-Torres, G. J., Murphy, Simon, Rotevatn, Torill Alise, Smith, Jesse, Evans, Rhiannon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33237552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8
_version_ 1783681313672265728
author Reed, Hayley
Couturiaux, Danielle
Davis, Marianne
Edwards, Amy
Janes, Edward
Kim, Hyun Sue
Melendez-Torres, G. J.
Murphy, Simon
Rotevatn, Torill Alise
Smith, Jesse
Evans, Rhiannon
author_facet Reed, Hayley
Couturiaux, Danielle
Davis, Marianne
Edwards, Amy
Janes, Edward
Kim, Hyun Sue
Melendez-Torres, G. J.
Murphy, Simon
Rotevatn, Torill Alise
Smith, Jesse
Evans, Rhiannon
author_sort Reed, Hayley
collection PubMed
description Co-production affords an intervention’s target population the opportunity to participate in intervention theory decision-making during the development process. This addresses the over-reliance on developing interventions through academic theories which can be devoid of contextual understanding and result in challenges to implementing school-based health programmes. There is an emergent empirical literature on co-producing school-based health interventions, but an understanding of appropriate theoretical types and processes and stakeholders’ experiences is lacking. Through the conduct of a systematic review, this study seeks to understand the types and underlying theories and processes for co-production in school-based health interventions with students aged 11–16. A thematic synthesis explored stakeholders’ experiences of the different types of co-production. A systematic search of five electronic bibliographic databases, citation tracking of included studies, and consultation with an expert international panel were employed. Of 27,433 unique papers, 30 papers representing 22 studies were retained to describe types, and 23 papers of 18 studies used to synthesise stakeholders’ experiences. Three types were identified: external, individual-level, and system-level capacity-building. Whilst this review showed variability in co-production types, stakeholders involved and processes, shared functions were identified. Students’, school staff, facilitators’ and researchers’ experiences in terms of acceptability, feasibility and undertaking decision-making are discussed. Recommendations for conceptualising and reporting co-production and process evaluations of co-produced school-based health interventions are highlighted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80602052021-05-05 Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences Reed, Hayley Couturiaux, Danielle Davis, Marianne Edwards, Amy Janes, Edward Kim, Hyun Sue Melendez-Torres, G. J. Murphy, Simon Rotevatn, Torill Alise Smith, Jesse Evans, Rhiannon Prev Sci Article Co-production affords an intervention’s target population the opportunity to participate in intervention theory decision-making during the development process. This addresses the over-reliance on developing interventions through academic theories which can be devoid of contextual understanding and result in challenges to implementing school-based health programmes. There is an emergent empirical literature on co-producing school-based health interventions, but an understanding of appropriate theoretical types and processes and stakeholders’ experiences is lacking. Through the conduct of a systematic review, this study seeks to understand the types and underlying theories and processes for co-production in school-based health interventions with students aged 11–16. A thematic synthesis explored stakeholders’ experiences of the different types of co-production. A systematic search of five electronic bibliographic databases, citation tracking of included studies, and consultation with an expert international panel were employed. Of 27,433 unique papers, 30 papers representing 22 studies were retained to describe types, and 23 papers of 18 studies used to synthesise stakeholders’ experiences. Three types were identified: external, individual-level, and system-level capacity-building. Whilst this review showed variability in co-production types, stakeholders involved and processes, shared functions were identified. Students’, school staff, facilitators’ and researchers’ experiences in terms of acceptability, feasibility and undertaking decision-making are discussed. Recommendations for conceptualising and reporting co-production and process evaluations of co-produced school-based health interventions are highlighted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8. Springer US 2020-11-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8060205/ /pubmed/33237552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Reed, Hayley
Couturiaux, Danielle
Davis, Marianne
Edwards, Amy
Janes, Edward
Kim, Hyun Sue
Melendez-Torres, G. J.
Murphy, Simon
Rotevatn, Torill Alise
Smith, Jesse
Evans, Rhiannon
Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title_full Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title_fullStr Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title_short Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11–16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders’ Experiences
title_sort co-production as an emerging methodology for developing school-based health interventions with students aged 11–16: systematic review of intervention types, theories and processes and thematic synthesis of stakeholders’ experiences
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33237552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8
work_keys_str_mv AT reedhayley coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT couturiauxdanielle coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT davismarianne coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT edwardsamy coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT janesedward coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT kimhyunsue coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT melendeztorresgj coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT murphysimon coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT rotevatntorillalise coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT smithjesse coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences
AT evansrhiannon coproductionasanemergingmethodologyfordevelopingschoolbasedhealthinterventionswithstudentsaged1116systematicreviewofinterventiontypestheoriesandprocessesandthematicsynthesisofstakeholdersexperiences