Cargando…

Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives

CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Champer, Jackson, Champer, Samuel E., Kim, Isabel K., Clark, Andrew G., Messer, Philipp W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180
_version_ 1783681531201454080
author Champer, Jackson
Champer, Samuel E.
Kim, Isabel K.
Clark, Andrew G.
Messer, Philipp W.
author_facet Champer, Jackson
Champer, Samuel E.
Kim, Isabel K.
Clark, Andrew G.
Messer, Philipp W.
author_sort Champer, Jackson
collection PubMed
description CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive constructs employing toxin‐antidote (TA) principles. These drives disrupt the wild‐type version of an essential gene using a CRISPR nuclease (the toxin) while simultaneously carrying a recoded version of the gene (the antidote). Drives of this nature allow for releases that could be potentially confined to a desired geographic location. This is because such drives have a nonzero‐invasion threshold frequency required for the drive to spread through the population. We model drives which target essential genes that are either haplosufficient or haplolethal, using nuclease promoters with expression restricted to the germline, promoters that additionally result in cleavage activity in the early embryo from maternal deposition, and promoters that have ubiquitous somatic expression. We also study several possible drive architectures, considering both “same‐site” and “distant‐site” systems, as well as several reciprocally targeting drives. Together, these drive variants provide a wide range of invasion threshold frequencies and options for both population modification and suppression. Our results suggest that CRISPR TA underdominance drive systems could allow for the design of flexible and potentially confinable gene drive strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80612662021-04-23 Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives Champer, Jackson Champer, Samuel E. Kim, Isabel K. Clark, Andrew G. Messer, Philipp W. Evol Appl Original Articles CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive constructs employing toxin‐antidote (TA) principles. These drives disrupt the wild‐type version of an essential gene using a CRISPR nuclease (the toxin) while simultaneously carrying a recoded version of the gene (the antidote). Drives of this nature allow for releases that could be potentially confined to a desired geographic location. This is because such drives have a nonzero‐invasion threshold frequency required for the drive to spread through the population. We model drives which target essential genes that are either haplosufficient or haplolethal, using nuclease promoters with expression restricted to the germline, promoters that additionally result in cleavage activity in the early embryo from maternal deposition, and promoters that have ubiquitous somatic expression. We also study several possible drive architectures, considering both “same‐site” and “distant‐site” systems, as well as several reciprocally targeting drives. Together, these drive variants provide a wide range of invasion threshold frequencies and options for both population modification and suppression. Our results suggest that CRISPR TA underdominance drive systems could allow for the design of flexible and potentially confinable gene drive strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8061266/ /pubmed/33897820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Champer, Jackson
Champer, Samuel E.
Kim, Isabel K.
Clark, Andrew G.
Messer, Philipp W.
Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title_full Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title_fullStr Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title_full_unstemmed Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title_short Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
title_sort design and analysis of crispr‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180
work_keys_str_mv AT champerjackson designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives
AT champersamuele designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives
AT kimisabelk designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives
AT clarkandrewg designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives
AT messerphilippw designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives