Cargando…
Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives
CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180 |
_version_ | 1783681531201454080 |
---|---|
author | Champer, Jackson Champer, Samuel E. Kim, Isabel K. Clark, Andrew G. Messer, Philipp W. |
author_facet | Champer, Jackson Champer, Samuel E. Kim, Isabel K. Clark, Andrew G. Messer, Philipp W. |
author_sort | Champer, Jackson |
collection | PubMed |
description | CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive constructs employing toxin‐antidote (TA) principles. These drives disrupt the wild‐type version of an essential gene using a CRISPR nuclease (the toxin) while simultaneously carrying a recoded version of the gene (the antidote). Drives of this nature allow for releases that could be potentially confined to a desired geographic location. This is because such drives have a nonzero‐invasion threshold frequency required for the drive to spread through the population. We model drives which target essential genes that are either haplosufficient or haplolethal, using nuclease promoters with expression restricted to the germline, promoters that additionally result in cleavage activity in the early embryo from maternal deposition, and promoters that have ubiquitous somatic expression. We also study several possible drive architectures, considering both “same‐site” and “distant‐site” systems, as well as several reciprocally targeting drives. Together, these drive variants provide a wide range of invasion threshold frequencies and options for both population modification and suppression. Our results suggest that CRISPR TA underdominance drive systems could allow for the design of flexible and potentially confinable gene drive strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8061266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80612662021-04-23 Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives Champer, Jackson Champer, Samuel E. Kim, Isabel K. Clark, Andrew G. Messer, Philipp W. Evol Appl Original Articles CRISPR gene drive systems offer a mechanism for transmitting a desirable transgene throughout a population for purposes ranging from vector‐borne disease control to invasive species suppression. In this simulation study, we assess the performance of several CRISPR‐based underdominance gene drive constructs employing toxin‐antidote (TA) principles. These drives disrupt the wild‐type version of an essential gene using a CRISPR nuclease (the toxin) while simultaneously carrying a recoded version of the gene (the antidote). Drives of this nature allow for releases that could be potentially confined to a desired geographic location. This is because such drives have a nonzero‐invasion threshold frequency required for the drive to spread through the population. We model drives which target essential genes that are either haplosufficient or haplolethal, using nuclease promoters with expression restricted to the germline, promoters that additionally result in cleavage activity in the early embryo from maternal deposition, and promoters that have ubiquitous somatic expression. We also study several possible drive architectures, considering both “same‐site” and “distant‐site” systems, as well as several reciprocally targeting drives. Together, these drive variants provide a wide range of invasion threshold frequencies and options for both population modification and suppression. Our results suggest that CRISPR TA underdominance drive systems could allow for the design of flexible and potentially confinable gene drive strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8061266/ /pubmed/33897820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Champer, Jackson Champer, Samuel E. Kim, Isabel K. Clark, Andrew G. Messer, Philipp W. Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title | Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title_full | Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title_fullStr | Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title_full_unstemmed | Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title_short | Design and analysis of CRISPR‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
title_sort | design and analysis of crispr‐based underdominance toxin‐antidote gene drives |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT champerjackson designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives AT champersamuele designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives AT kimisabelk designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives AT clarkandrewg designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives AT messerphilippw designandanalysisofcrisprbasedunderdominancetoxinantidotegenedrives |