Cargando…

Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria

Today, the tendency to use of natural preservatives to increase food security has expanded. In the present study, antibacterial effects of Areca Nut fruit extracts were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Enterobacter aerogenes bacteria using agar disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jam, Neda, Hajimohammadi, Reza, Gharbani, Parvin, Mehrizad, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6663399
_version_ 1783682206314528768
author Jam, Neda
Hajimohammadi, Reza
Gharbani, Parvin
Mehrizad, Ali
author_facet Jam, Neda
Hajimohammadi, Reza
Gharbani, Parvin
Mehrizad, Ali
author_sort Jam, Neda
collection PubMed
description Today, the tendency to use of natural preservatives to increase food security has expanded. In the present study, antibacterial effects of Areca Nut fruit extracts were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Enterobacter aerogenes bacteria using agar disc diffusion technique. Methanol, ethanol, and water were used as solvents for extraction by maceration method, and extracts were analyzed by GC-MS. The antibacterial activity was evaluated using microtiter broth dilution method to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Results revealed that all ATCC strains were significantly inhibited by ethanolic and methanolic extracts. Escherichia coli produced a significantly larger zone of inhibition for Gentamicin (35 ± 0.65 mm) and Penicillin (25 mm ± 0.56), while Enterobacter aerogenes produced smaller zone of inhibition for Gentamicin (20 ± 0.87 mm) and Penicillin (15 ± 0.87 mm). Also, methanolic extract had considerable antibacterial activity with MIC value of 1.56 mg/mL against Escherichia coli. All of extracts were used to evaluate antibacterial effects in prepared cake, and as a result, all pathogenies were the most sensitive by methanolic extract in 100 mg/L of concentration except Escherichia coli that were more sensitive by ethanolic extract. In conclusion, the Areca Nut fruit extracts may be used as a natural preservative in food industries. Future studies should focus on the effect of Areca Nut fruit extracts in bakery and drinking industries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8064777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80647772021-05-04 Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria Jam, Neda Hajimohammadi, Reza Gharbani, Parvin Mehrizad, Ali Biomed Res Int Research Article Today, the tendency to use of natural preservatives to increase food security has expanded. In the present study, antibacterial effects of Areca Nut fruit extracts were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Enterobacter aerogenes bacteria using agar disc diffusion technique. Methanol, ethanol, and water were used as solvents for extraction by maceration method, and extracts were analyzed by GC-MS. The antibacterial activity was evaluated using microtiter broth dilution method to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Results revealed that all ATCC strains were significantly inhibited by ethanolic and methanolic extracts. Escherichia coli produced a significantly larger zone of inhibition for Gentamicin (35 ± 0.65 mm) and Penicillin (25 mm ± 0.56), while Enterobacter aerogenes produced smaller zone of inhibition for Gentamicin (20 ± 0.87 mm) and Penicillin (15 ± 0.87 mm). Also, methanolic extract had considerable antibacterial activity with MIC value of 1.56 mg/mL against Escherichia coli. All of extracts were used to evaluate antibacterial effects in prepared cake, and as a result, all pathogenies were the most sensitive by methanolic extract in 100 mg/L of concentration except Escherichia coli that were more sensitive by ethanolic extract. In conclusion, the Areca Nut fruit extracts may be used as a natural preservative in food industries. Future studies should focus on the effect of Areca Nut fruit extracts in bakery and drinking industries. Hindawi 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8064777/ /pubmed/33954194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6663399 Text en Copyright © 2021 Neda Jam et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jam, Neda
Hajimohammadi, Reza
Gharbani, Parvin
Mehrizad, Ali
Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title_full Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title_fullStr Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title_short Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts of Areca Nut Fruit on Selected Bacteria
title_sort evaluation of antibacterial activity of aqueous, ethanolic and methanolic extracts of areca nut fruit on selected bacteria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6663399
work_keys_str_mv AT jamneda evaluationofantibacterialactivityofaqueousethanolicandmethanolicextractsofarecanutfruitonselectedbacteria
AT hajimohammadireza evaluationofantibacterialactivityofaqueousethanolicandmethanolicextractsofarecanutfruitonselectedbacteria
AT gharbaniparvin evaluationofantibacterialactivityofaqueousethanolicandmethanolicextractsofarecanutfruitonselectedbacteria
AT mehrizadali evaluationofantibacterialactivityofaqueousethanolicandmethanolicextractsofarecanutfruitonselectedbacteria