Cargando…
3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complex...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502 |
_version_ | 1783683898055589888 |
---|---|
author | Pape, Judith Emberton, Mark Cheema, Umber |
author_facet | Pape, Judith Emberton, Mark Cheema, Umber |
author_sort | Pape, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complexity of native tissues. This review explores different 3D models currently used, outlining their benefits and limitations. Specifically, this review focuses on stiffness and collagen density, compartmentalization, tumor-stroma cell population and extracellular matrix composition. Furthermore, this review explores the methods utilized in different models to directly measure cancer invasion and growth. Of the models evaluated, with PDX and in vivo as a relative “gold standard”, tumoroids were deemed as comparable 3D cancer models with a high degree of biomimicry, in terms of stiffness, collagen density and the ability to compartmentalize the tumor and stroma. Future 3D models for different cancer types are proposed in order to improve the biomimicry of cancer models used for studying disease progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8072339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80723392021-04-27 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness Pape, Judith Emberton, Mark Cheema, Umber Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complexity of native tissues. This review explores different 3D models currently used, outlining their benefits and limitations. Specifically, this review focuses on stiffness and collagen density, compartmentalization, tumor-stroma cell population and extracellular matrix composition. Furthermore, this review explores the methods utilized in different models to directly measure cancer invasion and growth. Of the models evaluated, with PDX and in vivo as a relative “gold standard”, tumoroids were deemed as comparable 3D cancer models with a high degree of biomimicry, in terms of stiffness, collagen density and the ability to compartmentalize the tumor and stroma. Future 3D models for different cancer types are proposed in order to improve the biomimicry of cancer models used for studying disease progression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072339/ /pubmed/33912551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pape, Emberton and Cheema. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pape, Judith Emberton, Mark Cheema, Umber 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title | 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title_full | 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title_fullStr | 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title_short | 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness |
title_sort | 3d cancer models: the need for a complex stroma, compartmentalization and stiffness |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papejudith 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness AT embertonmark 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness AT cheemaumber 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness |