Cargando…

3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness

The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pape, Judith, Emberton, Mark, Cheema, Umber
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502
_version_ 1783683898055589888
author Pape, Judith
Emberton, Mark
Cheema, Umber
author_facet Pape, Judith
Emberton, Mark
Cheema, Umber
author_sort Pape, Judith
collection PubMed
description The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complexity of native tissues. This review explores different 3D models currently used, outlining their benefits and limitations. Specifically, this review focuses on stiffness and collagen density, compartmentalization, tumor-stroma cell population and extracellular matrix composition. Furthermore, this review explores the methods utilized in different models to directly measure cancer invasion and growth. Of the models evaluated, with PDX and in vivo as a relative “gold standard”, tumoroids were deemed as comparable 3D cancer models with a high degree of biomimicry, in terms of stiffness, collagen density and the ability to compartmentalize the tumor and stroma. Future 3D models for different cancer types are proposed in order to improve the biomimicry of cancer models used for studying disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8072339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80723392021-04-27 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness Pape, Judith Emberton, Mark Cheema, Umber Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The use of tissue-engineered 3D models of cancer has grown in popularity with recent advances in the field of cancer research. 3D models are inherently more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers cultured on tissue-culture plastic. Nevertheless 3D models still lack the cellular and matrix complexity of native tissues. This review explores different 3D models currently used, outlining their benefits and limitations. Specifically, this review focuses on stiffness and collagen density, compartmentalization, tumor-stroma cell population and extracellular matrix composition. Furthermore, this review explores the methods utilized in different models to directly measure cancer invasion and growth. Of the models evaluated, with PDX and in vivo as a relative “gold standard”, tumoroids were deemed as comparable 3D cancer models with a high degree of biomimicry, in terms of stiffness, collagen density and the ability to compartmentalize the tumor and stroma. Future 3D models for different cancer types are proposed in order to improve the biomimicry of cancer models used for studying disease progression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072339/ /pubmed/33912551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pape, Emberton and Cheema. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Pape, Judith
Emberton, Mark
Cheema, Umber
3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title_full 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title_fullStr 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title_full_unstemmed 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title_short 3D Cancer Models: The Need for a Complex Stroma, Compartmentalization and Stiffness
title_sort 3d cancer models: the need for a complex stroma, compartmentalization and stiffness
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912551
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.660502
work_keys_str_mv AT papejudith 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness
AT embertonmark 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness
AT cheemaumber 3dcancermodelstheneedforacomplexstromacompartmentalizationandstiffness