Cargando…

Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State

OBJECTIVE: Intent recognition in lower-extremity assistive devices (e.g., prostheses and exoskeletons) is typically limited to either recognition of steady-state locomotion or changes of terrain (e.g., level ground to stair) occurring in a straight-line path and under anticipated condition. Stabilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh, Fey, Nicholas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.628050
_version_ 1783688743603929088
author Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh
Fey, Nicholas P.
author_facet Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh
Fey, Nicholas P.
author_sort Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intent recognition in lower-extremity assistive devices (e.g., prostheses and exoskeletons) is typically limited to either recognition of steady-state locomotion or changes of terrain (e.g., level ground to stair) occurring in a straight-line path and under anticipated condition. Stability is highly affected during non-steady changes of direction such as cuts especially when they are unanticipated, posing high risk of fall-related injuries. Here, we studied the influence of changes of direction and user anticipation on task recognition, and accordingly introduced classification schemes accommodating such effects. METHODS: A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier continuously classified straight-line walking, sidestep/crossover cuts (single transitions), and cuts-to-stair locomotion (mixed transitions) performed under varied task anticipatory conditions. Training paradigms with varying levels of anticipated/unanticipated exposures and analysis windows of size 100–600 ms were examined. RESULTS: More accurate classification of anticipated relative to unanticipated tasks was observed. Including bouts of target task in the training data was necessary to improve generalization to unanticipated locomotion. Only up to two bouts of target task were sufficient to reduce errors to <20% in unanticipated mixed transitions, whereas, in single transitions and straight walking, substantial unanticipated information (i.e., five bouts) was necessary to achieve similar outcomes. Window size modifications did not have a significant influence on classification performance. CONCLUSION: Adjusting the training paradigm helps to achieve classification schemes capable of adapting to changes of direction and task anticipatory state. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings could provide insight into developing classification schemes that can adapt to changes of direction and user anticipation. They could inform intent recognition strategies for controlling lower-limb assistive to robustly handle “unknown” circumstances, and thus deliver increased level of reliability and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8100249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81002492021-05-07 Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh Fey, Nicholas P. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology OBJECTIVE: Intent recognition in lower-extremity assistive devices (e.g., prostheses and exoskeletons) is typically limited to either recognition of steady-state locomotion or changes of terrain (e.g., level ground to stair) occurring in a straight-line path and under anticipated condition. Stability is highly affected during non-steady changes of direction such as cuts especially when they are unanticipated, posing high risk of fall-related injuries. Here, we studied the influence of changes of direction and user anticipation on task recognition, and accordingly introduced classification schemes accommodating such effects. METHODS: A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier continuously classified straight-line walking, sidestep/crossover cuts (single transitions), and cuts-to-stair locomotion (mixed transitions) performed under varied task anticipatory conditions. Training paradigms with varying levels of anticipated/unanticipated exposures and analysis windows of size 100–600 ms were examined. RESULTS: More accurate classification of anticipated relative to unanticipated tasks was observed. Including bouts of target task in the training data was necessary to improve generalization to unanticipated locomotion. Only up to two bouts of target task were sufficient to reduce errors to <20% in unanticipated mixed transitions, whereas, in single transitions and straight walking, substantial unanticipated information (i.e., five bouts) was necessary to achieve similar outcomes. Window size modifications did not have a significant influence on classification performance. CONCLUSION: Adjusting the training paradigm helps to achieve classification schemes capable of adapting to changes of direction and task anticipatory state. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings could provide insight into developing classification schemes that can adapt to changes of direction and user anticipation. They could inform intent recognition strategies for controlling lower-limb assistive to robustly handle “unknown” circumstances, and thus deliver increased level of reliability and safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8100249/ /pubmed/33968910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.628050 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kazemimoghadam and Fey. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Kazemimoghadam, Mahdieh
Fey, Nicholas P.
Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title_full Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title_fullStr Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title_short Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State
title_sort continuous classification of locomotion in response to task complexity and anticipatory state
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8100249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.628050
work_keys_str_mv AT kazemimoghadammahdieh continuousclassificationoflocomotioninresponsetotaskcomplexityandanticipatorystate
AT feynicholasp continuousclassificationoflocomotioninresponsetotaskcomplexityandanticipatorystate