Cargando…

Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors

INTRODUCTION: Based on the needs of the health system, continuous revising and monitoring are essential for General Practice (GP) Curriculum. The present study was conducted to investigate the diseases of GP Curriculum based on the students’ and professors’ viewpoints. METHODS: This cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR, EMADZADEH, ALI, POURSHIRAZI, MARYAM, KARIMI MOONAGHI, HOSEIN, HOSSEINI, SEYED JAVAD, ABBASI SHAYE, ZAHRA, SABOURI, GOLNAZ, HOSSEINI DOLATABADI, FATEMEH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026909
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2021.87035.1287
_version_ 1783689822765842432
author BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR
EMADZADEH, ALI
POURSHIRAZI, MARYAM
KARIMI MOONAGHI, HOSEIN
HOSSEINI, SEYED JAVAD
ABBASI SHAYE, ZAHRA
SABOURI, GOLNAZ
HOSSEINI DOLATABADI, FATEMEH
author_facet BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR
EMADZADEH, ALI
POURSHIRAZI, MARYAM
KARIMI MOONAGHI, HOSEIN
HOSSEINI, SEYED JAVAD
ABBASI SHAYE, ZAHRA
SABOURI, GOLNAZ
HOSSEINI DOLATABADI, FATEMEH
author_sort BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Based on the needs of the health system, continuous revising and monitoring are essential for General Practice (GP) Curriculum. The present study was conducted to investigate the diseases of GP Curriculum based on the students’ and professors’ viewpoints. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2018. A total of 80 GP students of internship and 71 professors of the faculty of medicine in clinical and basic science disciplines were enrolled in the study using quota and convenience sampling methods, respectively. Two self-made, reliable, and validated 4-point scale questionnaires (ranging from totally agree to totally disagree) were used to collect the data on the viewpoints of students and professors on the diseases of GP curriculum. The mean score and percentage of agreement between professors and students on the incidence of each disease were calculated. RESULTS: The highest and lowest rates of agreement between the professors and students in terms of the presence of curriculum diseases belonged to the echolalia curriculum with a mean and standard deviation of 1.92±0.68 and the dean denial with a mean and standard deviation of 2.0±6.68, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the viewpoints of professors and students regarding the diseases of the carcinoma of the curriculum (P<0.001), idiopathic colitis (P<0.001), the schizophrenia of the curriculum (P=0.01), and echolalia curriculum (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that professors and students were all in agreement about 12 out of 13 diseases of the GP curriculum. Thus, educational planners in Iran’s medical schools should focus on the continuous evaluation and the necessity of curriculum revision, as one of the priorities of the educational system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81067372021-05-21 Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR EMADZADEH, ALI POURSHIRAZI, MARYAM KARIMI MOONAGHI, HOSEIN HOSSEINI, SEYED JAVAD ABBASI SHAYE, ZAHRA SABOURI, GOLNAZ HOSSEINI DOLATABADI, FATEMEH J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: Based on the needs of the health system, continuous revising and monitoring are essential for General Practice (GP) Curriculum. The present study was conducted to investigate the diseases of GP Curriculum based on the students’ and professors’ viewpoints. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2018. A total of 80 GP students of internship and 71 professors of the faculty of medicine in clinical and basic science disciplines were enrolled in the study using quota and convenience sampling methods, respectively. Two self-made, reliable, and validated 4-point scale questionnaires (ranging from totally agree to totally disagree) were used to collect the data on the viewpoints of students and professors on the diseases of GP curriculum. The mean score and percentage of agreement between professors and students on the incidence of each disease were calculated. RESULTS: The highest and lowest rates of agreement between the professors and students in terms of the presence of curriculum diseases belonged to the echolalia curriculum with a mean and standard deviation of 1.92±0.68 and the dean denial with a mean and standard deviation of 2.0±6.68, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the viewpoints of professors and students regarding the diseases of the carcinoma of the curriculum (P<0.001), idiopathic colitis (P<0.001), the schizophrenia of the curriculum (P=0.01), and echolalia curriculum (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that professors and students were all in agreement about 12 out of 13 diseases of the GP curriculum. Thus, educational planners in Iran’s medical schools should focus on the continuous evaluation and the necessity of curriculum revision, as one of the priorities of the educational system. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8106737/ /pubmed/34026909 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2021.87035.1287 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
BADIEE AVAL, SHAPOUR
EMADZADEH, ALI
POURSHIRAZI, MARYAM
KARIMI MOONAGHI, HOSEIN
HOSSEINI, SEYED JAVAD
ABBASI SHAYE, ZAHRA
SABOURI, GOLNAZ
HOSSEINI DOLATABADI, FATEMEH
Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title_full Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title_fullStr Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title_full_unstemmed Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title_short Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors
title_sort pathology of general practice curriculum from the viewpoint of students and professors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026909
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2021.87035.1287
work_keys_str_mv AT badieeavalshapour pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT emadzadehali pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT pourshirazimaryam pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT karimimoonaghihosein pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT hosseiniseyedjavad pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT abbasishayezahra pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT sabourigolnaz pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors
AT hosseinidolatabadifatemeh pathologyofgeneralpracticecurriculumfromtheviewpointofstudentsandprofessors