Cargando…

Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Interesterified (IE) fats are widely used in place of trans fats; however, little is known about their metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To test the impact of a commonly consumed IE compared with a non-IE equivalent fat on in vivo postprandial and in vitro lipid metabolism, compared with a referen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Charlotte E, Harding, Scott V, Bapir, Mariam, Mandalari, Giuseppina, Salt, Louise J, Gray, Robert, Fielding, Barbara A, Wilde, Peter J, Hall, Wendy L, Berry, Sarah E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa413
_version_ 1783689826109751296
author Mills, Charlotte E
Harding, Scott V
Bapir, Mariam
Mandalari, Giuseppina
Salt, Louise J
Gray, Robert
Fielding, Barbara A
Wilde, Peter J
Hall, Wendy L
Berry, Sarah E
author_facet Mills, Charlotte E
Harding, Scott V
Bapir, Mariam
Mandalari, Giuseppina
Salt, Louise J
Gray, Robert
Fielding, Barbara A
Wilde, Peter J
Hall, Wendy L
Berry, Sarah E
author_sort Mills, Charlotte E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interesterified (IE) fats are widely used in place of trans fats; however, little is known about their metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To test the impact of a commonly consumed IE compared with a non-IE equivalent fat on in vivo postprandial and in vitro lipid metabolism, compared with a reference oil [rapeseed oil (RO)]. METHODS: A double-blinded, 3-phase crossover, randomized controlled trial was performed in healthy adults (n = 20) aged 45–75 y. Postprandial plasma triacylglycerol and lipoprotein responses (including stable isotope tracing) to a test meal (50 g fat) were evaluated over 8 h. The test fats were IE 80:20 palm stearin/palm kernel fat, an identical non-IE fat, and RO (control). In vitro, mechanisms of digestion were explored using a dynamic gastric model (DGM). RESULTS: Plasma triacylglycerol 8-h incremental area under the curves were lower following non-IE compared with RO [–1.7 mmol/L⋅h (95% CI: –3.3, –0.0)], but there were no differences between IE and RO or IE and non-IE. LDL particles were smaller following IE and non-IE compared with RO (P = 0.005). Extra extra large, extra large, and large VLDL particle concentrations were higher following IE and non-IE compared with RO at 6–8 h (P < 0.05). No differences in the appearance of [(13)C]palmitic acid in plasma triacylglycerol were observed between IE and non-IE fats. DGM revealed differences in phase separation of the IE and non-IE meals and delayed release of SFAs compared with RO. CONCLUSIONS: Interesterification did not modify fat digestion, postprandial lipemia, or lipid metabolism measured by stable isotope and DGM analysis. Despite the lower lipemia following the SFA-rich fats, increased proatherogenic large triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein remnant and small LDL particles following the SFA-rich fats relative to RO adds a new postprandial dimension to the mechanistic evidence linking SFAs to cardiovascular disease risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8106759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81067592021-05-17 Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial Mills, Charlotte E Harding, Scott V Bapir, Mariam Mandalari, Giuseppina Salt, Louise J Gray, Robert Fielding, Barbara A Wilde, Peter J Hall, Wendy L Berry, Sarah E Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Interesterified (IE) fats are widely used in place of trans fats; however, little is known about their metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To test the impact of a commonly consumed IE compared with a non-IE equivalent fat on in vivo postprandial and in vitro lipid metabolism, compared with a reference oil [rapeseed oil (RO)]. METHODS: A double-blinded, 3-phase crossover, randomized controlled trial was performed in healthy adults (n = 20) aged 45–75 y. Postprandial plasma triacylglycerol and lipoprotein responses (including stable isotope tracing) to a test meal (50 g fat) were evaluated over 8 h. The test fats were IE 80:20 palm stearin/palm kernel fat, an identical non-IE fat, and RO (control). In vitro, mechanisms of digestion were explored using a dynamic gastric model (DGM). RESULTS: Plasma triacylglycerol 8-h incremental area under the curves were lower following non-IE compared with RO [–1.7 mmol/L⋅h (95% CI: –3.3, –0.0)], but there were no differences between IE and RO or IE and non-IE. LDL particles were smaller following IE and non-IE compared with RO (P = 0.005). Extra extra large, extra large, and large VLDL particle concentrations were higher following IE and non-IE compared with RO at 6–8 h (P < 0.05). No differences in the appearance of [(13)C]palmitic acid in plasma triacylglycerol were observed between IE and non-IE fats. DGM revealed differences in phase separation of the IE and non-IE meals and delayed release of SFAs compared with RO. CONCLUSIONS: Interesterification did not modify fat digestion, postprandial lipemia, or lipid metabolism measured by stable isotope and DGM analysis. Despite the lower lipemia following the SFA-rich fats, increased proatherogenic large triacylglycerol-rich lipoprotein remnant and small LDL particles following the SFA-rich fats relative to RO adds a new postprandial dimension to the mechanistic evidence linking SFAs to cardiovascular disease risk. Oxford University Press 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8106759/ /pubmed/33675343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa413 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Mills, Charlotte E
Harding, Scott V
Bapir, Mariam
Mandalari, Giuseppina
Salt, Louise J
Gray, Robert
Fielding, Barbara A
Wilde, Peter J
Hall, Wendy L
Berry, Sarah E
Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a MUFA-rich oil: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort palmitic acid–rich oils with and without interesterification lower postprandial lipemia and increase atherogenic lipoproteins compared with a mufa-rich oil: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8106759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa413
work_keys_str_mv AT millscharlottee palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hardingscottv palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bapirmariam palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mandalarigiuseppina palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saltlouisej palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grayrobert palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fieldingbarbaraa palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wildepeterj palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hallwendyl palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT berrysarahe palmiticacidrichoilswithandwithoutinteresterificationlowerpostprandiallipemiaandincreaseatherogeniclipoproteinscomparedwithamufarichoilarandomizedcontrolledtrial