Cargando…

Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory

A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Gemma L., Wharton, Tim, Jagoe, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664
_version_ 1783691536139026432
author Williams, Gemma L.
Wharton, Tim
Jagoe, Caroline
author_facet Williams, Gemma L.
Wharton, Tim
Jagoe, Caroline
author_sort Williams, Gemma L.
collection PubMed
description A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as a means of explaining such communication difficulties. Based on a set of proposed heuristics for successful and rapid interpretation of intended meaning, relevance theory positions communication as contingent on shared—and, importantly, mutually recognized—“relevance.” Given that autistic and non-autistic people may have sometimes markedly different embodied experiences of the world, we argue that what is most salient to each interlocutor may be mismatched. Relevance theory would predict that where this salient information is not (mutually) recognized or adjusted for, mutual understanding may be more effortful to achieve. This paper presents the findings from a small-scale, linguistic ethnographic study of autistic communication featuring eight core autistic participants. Each core autistic participant engaged in three naturalistic conversations around the topic of loneliness with: (1) a familiar, chosen conversation partner; (2) a non-autistic stranger and (3) an autistic stranger. Relevance theory is utilized as a frame for the linguistic analysis of the interactions. Mutual understanding was unexpectedly high across all types of conversation pairings. In conversations involving two autistic participants, flow, rapport and intersubjective attunement were significantly increased and in three instances, autistic interlocutors appeared to experience improvements in their individual communicative competence contrasted with their other conversations. The findings have the potential to guide future thinking about how, in practical terms, communication between autistic and non-autistic people in both personal and public settings might be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8117104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81171042021-05-14 Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory Williams, Gemma L. Wharton, Tim Jagoe, Caroline Front Psychol Psychology A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as a means of explaining such communication difficulties. Based on a set of proposed heuristics for successful and rapid interpretation of intended meaning, relevance theory positions communication as contingent on shared—and, importantly, mutually recognized—“relevance.” Given that autistic and non-autistic people may have sometimes markedly different embodied experiences of the world, we argue that what is most salient to each interlocutor may be mismatched. Relevance theory would predict that where this salient information is not (mutually) recognized or adjusted for, mutual understanding may be more effortful to achieve. This paper presents the findings from a small-scale, linguistic ethnographic study of autistic communication featuring eight core autistic participants. Each core autistic participant engaged in three naturalistic conversations around the topic of loneliness with: (1) a familiar, chosen conversation partner; (2) a non-autistic stranger and (3) an autistic stranger. Relevance theory is utilized as a frame for the linguistic analysis of the interactions. Mutual understanding was unexpectedly high across all types of conversation pairings. In conversations involving two autistic participants, flow, rapport and intersubjective attunement were significantly increased and in three instances, autistic interlocutors appeared to experience improvements in their individual communicative competence contrasted with their other conversations. The findings have the potential to guide future thinking about how, in practical terms, communication between autistic and non-autistic people in both personal and public settings might be improved. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8117104/ /pubmed/33995177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664 Text en Copyright © 2021 Williams, Wharton and Jagoe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Williams, Gemma L.
Wharton, Tim
Jagoe, Caroline
Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title_full Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title_fullStr Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title_full_unstemmed Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title_short Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
title_sort mutual (mis)understanding: reframing autistic pragmatic “impairments” using relevance theory
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995177
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsgemmal mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory
AT whartontim mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory
AT jagoecaroline mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory