Cargando…
Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory
A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664 |
_version_ | 1783691536139026432 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Gemma L. Wharton, Tim Jagoe, Caroline |
author_facet | Williams, Gemma L. Wharton, Tim Jagoe, Caroline |
author_sort | Williams, Gemma L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as a means of explaining such communication difficulties. Based on a set of proposed heuristics for successful and rapid interpretation of intended meaning, relevance theory positions communication as contingent on shared—and, importantly, mutually recognized—“relevance.” Given that autistic and non-autistic people may have sometimes markedly different embodied experiences of the world, we argue that what is most salient to each interlocutor may be mismatched. Relevance theory would predict that where this salient information is not (mutually) recognized or adjusted for, mutual understanding may be more effortful to achieve. This paper presents the findings from a small-scale, linguistic ethnographic study of autistic communication featuring eight core autistic participants. Each core autistic participant engaged in three naturalistic conversations around the topic of loneliness with: (1) a familiar, chosen conversation partner; (2) a non-autistic stranger and (3) an autistic stranger. Relevance theory is utilized as a frame for the linguistic analysis of the interactions. Mutual understanding was unexpectedly high across all types of conversation pairings. In conversations involving two autistic participants, flow, rapport and intersubjective attunement were significantly increased and in three instances, autistic interlocutors appeared to experience improvements in their individual communicative competence contrasted with their other conversations. The findings have the potential to guide future thinking about how, in practical terms, communication between autistic and non-autistic people in both personal and public settings might be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8117104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81171042021-05-14 Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory Williams, Gemma L. Wharton, Tim Jagoe, Caroline Front Psychol Psychology A central diagnostic and anecdotal feature of autism is difficulty with social communication. We take the position that communication is a two-way, intersubjective phenomenon—as described by the double empathy problem—and offer up relevance theory (a cognitive account of utterance interpretation) as a means of explaining such communication difficulties. Based on a set of proposed heuristics for successful and rapid interpretation of intended meaning, relevance theory positions communication as contingent on shared—and, importantly, mutually recognized—“relevance.” Given that autistic and non-autistic people may have sometimes markedly different embodied experiences of the world, we argue that what is most salient to each interlocutor may be mismatched. Relevance theory would predict that where this salient information is not (mutually) recognized or adjusted for, mutual understanding may be more effortful to achieve. This paper presents the findings from a small-scale, linguistic ethnographic study of autistic communication featuring eight core autistic participants. Each core autistic participant engaged in three naturalistic conversations around the topic of loneliness with: (1) a familiar, chosen conversation partner; (2) a non-autistic stranger and (3) an autistic stranger. Relevance theory is utilized as a frame for the linguistic analysis of the interactions. Mutual understanding was unexpectedly high across all types of conversation pairings. In conversations involving two autistic participants, flow, rapport and intersubjective attunement were significantly increased and in three instances, autistic interlocutors appeared to experience improvements in their individual communicative competence contrasted with their other conversations. The findings have the potential to guide future thinking about how, in practical terms, communication between autistic and non-autistic people in both personal and public settings might be improved. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8117104/ /pubmed/33995177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664 Text en Copyright © 2021 Williams, Wharton and Jagoe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Williams, Gemma L. Wharton, Tim Jagoe, Caroline Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title | Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title_full | Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title_fullStr | Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title_short | Mutual (Mis)understanding: Reframing Autistic Pragmatic “Impairments” Using Relevance Theory |
title_sort | mutual (mis)understanding: reframing autistic pragmatic “impairments” using relevance theory |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsgemmal mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory AT whartontim mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory AT jagoecaroline mutualmisunderstandingreframingautisticpragmaticimpairmentsusingrelevancetheory |