Cargando…
Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may aff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585 |
_version_ | 1783693771600297984 |
---|---|
author | LOPEZ, PEDRO RADAELLI, RÉGIS TAAFFE, DENNIS R. NEWTON, ROBERT U. GALVÃO, DANIEL A. TRAJANO, GABRIEL S. TEODORO, JULIANA L. KRAEMER, WILLIAM J. HÄKKINEN, KEIJO PINTO, RONEI S. |
author_facet | LOPEZ, PEDRO RADAELLI, RÉGIS TAAFFE, DENNIS R. NEWTON, ROBERT U. GALVÃO, DANIEL A. TRAJANO, GABRIEL S. TEODORO, JULIANA L. KRAEMER, WILLIAM J. HÄKKINEN, KEIJO PINTO, RONEI S. |
author_sort | LOPEZ, PEDRO |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may affect the adaptations. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Including only studies that performed sets to volitional failure, the effects of low- (>15 repetitions maximum (RM)), moderate- (9–15 RM), and high-load (≤8 RM) RTs were examined in healthy adults. Network meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between RT loads in overall and subgroup analyses involving studies deemed of high quality. Associations between participant-, design-, and training-related covariates with SMD were assessed by univariate and multivariate network meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 747 healthy adults were included. Although no differences in muscle hypertrophy between RT loads were found in overall (P = 0.113–0.469) or subgroup analysis (P = 0.871–0.995), greater effects were observed in untrained participants (P = 0.033) and participants with some training background who undertook more RT sessions (P = 0.031–0.045). Muscle strength improvement was superior for both high-load and moderate-load compared with low-load RT in overall and subgroup analysis (SMD, 0.60–0.63 and 0.34–0.35, respectively; P < 0.001–0.003), with a nonsignificant but superior effect for high compared with moderate load (SMD, 0.26–0.28, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Although muscle hypertrophy improvements seem to be load independent, increases in muscle strength are superior in high-load RT programs. Untrained participants exhibit greater muscle hypertrophy, whereas undertaking more RT sessions provides superior gains in those with previous training experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8126497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81264972021-05-20 Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis LOPEZ, PEDRO RADAELLI, RÉGIS TAAFFE, DENNIS R. NEWTON, ROBERT U. GALVÃO, DANIEL A. TRAJANO, GABRIEL S. TEODORO, JULIANA L. KRAEMER, WILLIAM J. HÄKKINEN, KEIJO PINTO, RONEI S. Med Sci Sports Exerc Applied Sciences PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may affect the adaptations. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Including only studies that performed sets to volitional failure, the effects of low- (>15 repetitions maximum (RM)), moderate- (9–15 RM), and high-load (≤8 RM) RTs were examined in healthy adults. Network meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between RT loads in overall and subgroup analyses involving studies deemed of high quality. Associations between participant-, design-, and training-related covariates with SMD were assessed by univariate and multivariate network meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 747 healthy adults were included. Although no differences in muscle hypertrophy between RT loads were found in overall (P = 0.113–0.469) or subgroup analysis (P = 0.871–0.995), greater effects were observed in untrained participants (P = 0.033) and participants with some training background who undertook more RT sessions (P = 0.031–0.045). Muscle strength improvement was superior for both high-load and moderate-load compared with low-load RT in overall and subgroup analysis (SMD, 0.60–0.63 and 0.34–0.35, respectively; P < 0.001–0.003), with a nonsignificant but superior effect for high compared with moderate load (SMD, 0.26–0.28, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Although muscle hypertrophy improvements seem to be load independent, increases in muscle strength are superior in high-load RT programs. Untrained participants exhibit greater muscle hypertrophy, whereas undertaking more RT sessions provides superior gains in those with previous training experience. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06 2020-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8126497/ /pubmed/33433148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Applied Sciences LOPEZ, PEDRO RADAELLI, RÉGIS TAAFFE, DENNIS R. NEWTON, ROBERT U. GALVÃO, DANIEL A. TRAJANO, GABRIEL S. TEODORO, JULIANA L. KRAEMER, WILLIAM J. HÄKKINEN, KEIJO PINTO, RONEI S. Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title | Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full | Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_short | Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis |
title_sort | resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Applied Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezpedro resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT radaelliregis resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT taaffedennisr resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT newtonrobertu resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT galvaodaniela resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT trajanogabriels resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT teodorojulianal resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kraemerwilliamj resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hakkinenkeijo resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pintoroneis resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |