Cargando…

Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may aff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LOPEZ, PEDRO, RADAELLI, RÉGIS, TAAFFE, DENNIS R., NEWTON, ROBERT U., GALVÃO, DANIEL A., TRAJANO, GABRIEL S., TEODORO, JULIANA L., KRAEMER, WILLIAM J., HÄKKINEN, KEIJO, PINTO, RONEI S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585
_version_ 1783693771600297984
author LOPEZ, PEDRO
RADAELLI, RÉGIS
TAAFFE, DENNIS R.
NEWTON, ROBERT U.
GALVÃO, DANIEL A.
TRAJANO, GABRIEL S.
TEODORO, JULIANA L.
KRAEMER, WILLIAM J.
HÄKKINEN, KEIJO
PINTO, RONEI S.
author_facet LOPEZ, PEDRO
RADAELLI, RÉGIS
TAAFFE, DENNIS R.
NEWTON, ROBERT U.
GALVÃO, DANIEL A.
TRAJANO, GABRIEL S.
TEODORO, JULIANA L.
KRAEMER, WILLIAM J.
HÄKKINEN, KEIJO
PINTO, RONEI S.
author_sort LOPEZ, PEDRO
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may affect the adaptations. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Including only studies that performed sets to volitional failure, the effects of low- (>15 repetitions maximum (RM)), moderate- (9–15 RM), and high-load (≤8 RM) RTs were examined in healthy adults. Network meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between RT loads in overall and subgroup analyses involving studies deemed of high quality. Associations between participant-, design-, and training-related covariates with SMD were assessed by univariate and multivariate network meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 747 healthy adults were included. Although no differences in muscle hypertrophy between RT loads were found in overall (P = 0.113–0.469) or subgroup analysis (P = 0.871–0.995), greater effects were observed in untrained participants (P = 0.033) and participants with some training background who undertook more RT sessions (P = 0.031–0.045). Muscle strength improvement was superior for both high-load and moderate-load compared with low-load RT in overall and subgroup analysis (SMD, 0.60–0.63 and 0.34–0.35, respectively; P < 0.001–0.003), with a nonsignificant but superior effect for high compared with moderate load (SMD, 0.26–0.28, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Although muscle hypertrophy improvements seem to be load independent, increases in muscle strength are superior in high-load RT programs. Untrained participants exhibit greater muscle hypertrophy, whereas undertaking more RT sessions provides superior gains in those with previous training experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8126497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81264972021-05-20 Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis LOPEZ, PEDRO RADAELLI, RÉGIS TAAFFE, DENNIS R. NEWTON, ROBERT U. GALVÃO, DANIEL A. TRAJANO, GABRIEL S. TEODORO, JULIANA L. KRAEMER, WILLIAM J. HÄKKINEN, KEIJO PINTO, RONEI S. Med Sci Sports Exerc Applied Sciences PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low, moderate, and high loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults and to assess the possible participant-, design-, and training-related covariates that may affect the adaptations. METHODS: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Including only studies that performed sets to volitional failure, the effects of low- (>15 repetitions maximum (RM)), moderate- (9–15 RM), and high-load (≤8 RM) RTs were examined in healthy adults. Network meta-analysis was undertaken to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between RT loads in overall and subgroup analyses involving studies deemed of high quality. Associations between participant-, design-, and training-related covariates with SMD were assessed by univariate and multivariate network meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 747 healthy adults were included. Although no differences in muscle hypertrophy between RT loads were found in overall (P = 0.113–0.469) or subgroup analysis (P = 0.871–0.995), greater effects were observed in untrained participants (P = 0.033) and participants with some training background who undertook more RT sessions (P = 0.031–0.045). Muscle strength improvement was superior for both high-load and moderate-load compared with low-load RT in overall and subgroup analysis (SMD, 0.60–0.63 and 0.34–0.35, respectively; P < 0.001–0.003), with a nonsignificant but superior effect for high compared with moderate load (SMD, 0.26–0.28, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Although muscle hypertrophy improvements seem to be load independent, increases in muscle strength are superior in high-load RT programs. Untrained participants exhibit greater muscle hypertrophy, whereas undertaking more RT sessions provides superior gains in those with previous training experience. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06 2020-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8126497/ /pubmed/33433148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Applied Sciences
LOPEZ, PEDRO
RADAELLI, RÉGIS
TAAFFE, DENNIS R.
NEWTON, ROBERT U.
GALVÃO, DANIEL A.
TRAJANO, GABRIEL S.
TEODORO, JULIANA L.
KRAEMER, WILLIAM J.
HÄKKINEN, KEIJO
PINTO, RONEI S.
Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_short Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
title_sort resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Applied Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezpedro resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT radaelliregis resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT taaffedennisr resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT newtonrobertu resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT galvaodaniela resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT trajanogabriels resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT teodorojulianal resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kraemerwilliamj resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hakkinenkeijo resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT pintoroneis resistancetrainingloadeffectsonmusclehypertrophyandstrengthgainsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis