Cargando…

Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons

To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghidinelli, Monica, Cunningham, Michael, Monotti, Isobel C., Hindocha, Nishma, Rickli, Alain, McVicar, Iain, Glyde, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317
_version_ 1783694075964162048
author Ghidinelli, Monica
Cunningham, Michael
Monotti, Isobel C.
Hindocha, Nishma
Rickli, Alain
McVicar, Iain
Glyde, Mark
author_facet Ghidinelli, Monica
Cunningham, Michael
Monotti, Isobel C.
Hindocha, Nishma
Rickli, Alain
McVicar, Iain
Glyde, Mark
author_sort Ghidinelli, Monica
collection PubMed
description To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81282192021-05-21 Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons Ghidinelli, Monica Cunningham, Michael Monotti, Isobel C. Hindocha, Nishma Rickli, Alain McVicar, Iain Glyde, Mark J Eur CME Research Article To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process. Taylor & Francis 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8128219/ /pubmed/34026323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghidinelli, Monica
Cunningham, Michael
Monotti, Isobel C.
Hindocha, Nishma
Rickli, Alain
McVicar, Iain
Glyde, Mark
Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title_full Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title_fullStr Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title_short Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
title_sort experiences from two ways of integrating pre- and post-course multiple-choice assessment questions in educational events for surgeons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317
work_keys_str_mv AT ghidinellimonica experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT cunninghammichael experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT monottiisobelc experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT hindochanishma experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT ricklialain experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT mcvicariain experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons
AT glydemark experiencesfromtwowaysofintegratingpreandpostcoursemultiplechoiceassessmentquestionsineducationaleventsforsurgeons