Cargando…

Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patti, Maria Letizia, De Rose, Cristina, Brancato, Federica, Gambacorta, Alessandro, Miceli Sopo, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944826
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043
_version_ 1783696619373330432
author Patti, Maria Letizia
De Rose, Cristina
Brancato, Federica
Gambacorta, Alessandro
Miceli Sopo, Stefano
author_facet Patti, Maria Letizia
De Rose, Cristina
Brancato, Federica
Gambacorta, Alessandro
Miceli Sopo, Stefano
author_sort Patti, Maria Letizia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., prick by prick (PbP). To our knowledge, there is no published comparison between SPT with commercial extracts and PbP with fresh food about their sensitivity to the diagnosis of walnut allergy. Therefore, we describe our experience. METHODS: We observed seven children (mean age ± SD 6.8 years ± 5.2, range 2 - 15 years; male 85%) with an history of immediate adverse reaction following walnut ingestion. All but one the patients underwent SPT with at least two out of three walnut commercial extracts (Lofarma, Milan, Italy; ALK-Abellò, Milan, Italy; Allergopharma, Rome, Italy). It has also been performed PbP with raw walnut. IgE-mediated walnut allergy was diagnosed based on suggestive history, positivity of PbP and failed open food challenge with walnut. RESULTS: The SPT with Lofarma extract was never positive (sensitivity = 0%), that performed with ALK extract was positive in 2/5 cases (sensitivity 40%) and that of Allergopharma extract was positive in 1/5 cases (sensitivity 20%). PbP was positive in 7/7 cases (sensitivity 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific case of walnut allergy in pediatric age, the execution of SPT alone with commercial extract may not be sufficient and clarifying in the diagnostic iter. We suggest to always associate the execution of PbP test. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81427702021-05-27 Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy Patti, Maria Letizia De Rose, Cristina Brancato, Federica Gambacorta, Alessandro Miceli Sopo, Stefano Acta Biomed Case Report BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., prick by prick (PbP). To our knowledge, there is no published comparison between SPT with commercial extracts and PbP with fresh food about their sensitivity to the diagnosis of walnut allergy. Therefore, we describe our experience. METHODS: We observed seven children (mean age ± SD 6.8 years ± 5.2, range 2 - 15 years; male 85%) with an history of immediate adverse reaction following walnut ingestion. All but one the patients underwent SPT with at least two out of three walnut commercial extracts (Lofarma, Milan, Italy; ALK-Abellò, Milan, Italy; Allergopharma, Rome, Italy). It has also been performed PbP with raw walnut. IgE-mediated walnut allergy was diagnosed based on suggestive history, positivity of PbP and failed open food challenge with walnut. RESULTS: The SPT with Lofarma extract was never positive (sensitivity = 0%), that performed with ALK extract was positive in 2/5 cases (sensitivity 40%) and that of Allergopharma extract was positive in 1/5 cases (sensitivity 20%). PbP was positive in 7/7 cases (sensitivity 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific case of walnut allergy in pediatric age, the execution of SPT alone with commercial extract may not be sufficient and clarifying in the diagnostic iter. We suggest to always associate the execution of PbP test. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8142770/ /pubmed/33944826 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Case Report
Patti, Maria Letizia
De Rose, Cristina
Brancato, Federica
Gambacorta, Alessandro
Miceli Sopo, Stefano
Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title_full Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title_fullStr Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title_short Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
title_sort sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944826
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043
work_keys_str_mv AT pattimarialetizia sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy
AT derosecristina sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy
AT brancatofederica sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy
AT gambacortaalessandro sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy
AT micelisopostefano sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy