Cargando…
Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944826 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043 |
_version_ | 1783696619373330432 |
---|---|
author | Patti, Maria Letizia De Rose, Cristina Brancato, Federica Gambacorta, Alessandro Miceli Sopo, Stefano |
author_facet | Patti, Maria Letizia De Rose, Cristina Brancato, Federica Gambacorta, Alessandro Miceli Sopo, Stefano |
author_sort | Patti, Maria Letizia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., prick by prick (PbP). To our knowledge, there is no published comparison between SPT with commercial extracts and PbP with fresh food about their sensitivity to the diagnosis of walnut allergy. Therefore, we describe our experience. METHODS: We observed seven children (mean age ± SD 6.8 years ± 5.2, range 2 - 15 years; male 85%) with an history of immediate adverse reaction following walnut ingestion. All but one the patients underwent SPT with at least two out of three walnut commercial extracts (Lofarma, Milan, Italy; ALK-Abellò, Milan, Italy; Allergopharma, Rome, Italy). It has also been performed PbP with raw walnut. IgE-mediated walnut allergy was diagnosed based on suggestive history, positivity of PbP and failed open food challenge with walnut. RESULTS: The SPT with Lofarma extract was never positive (sensitivity = 0%), that performed with ALK extract was positive in 2/5 cases (sensitivity 40%) and that of Allergopharma extract was positive in 1/5 cases (sensitivity 20%). PbP was positive in 7/7 cases (sensitivity 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific case of walnut allergy in pediatric age, the execution of SPT alone with commercial extract may not be sufficient and clarifying in the diagnostic iter. We suggest to always associate the execution of PbP test. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81427702021-05-27 Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy Patti, Maria Letizia De Rose, Cristina Brancato, Federica Gambacorta, Alessandro Miceli Sopo, Stefano Acta Biomed Case Report BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., prick by prick (PbP). To our knowledge, there is no published comparison between SPT with commercial extracts and PbP with fresh food about their sensitivity to the diagnosis of walnut allergy. Therefore, we describe our experience. METHODS: We observed seven children (mean age ± SD 6.8 years ± 5.2, range 2 - 15 years; male 85%) with an history of immediate adverse reaction following walnut ingestion. All but one the patients underwent SPT with at least two out of three walnut commercial extracts (Lofarma, Milan, Italy; ALK-Abellò, Milan, Italy; Allergopharma, Rome, Italy). It has also been performed PbP with raw walnut. IgE-mediated walnut allergy was diagnosed based on suggestive history, positivity of PbP and failed open food challenge with walnut. RESULTS: The SPT with Lofarma extract was never positive (sensitivity = 0%), that performed with ALK extract was positive in 2/5 cases (sensitivity 40%) and that of Allergopharma extract was positive in 1/5 cases (sensitivity 20%). PbP was positive in 7/7 cases (sensitivity 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific case of walnut allergy in pediatric age, the execution of SPT alone with commercial extract may not be sufficient and clarifying in the diagnostic iter. We suggest to always associate the execution of PbP test. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8142770/ /pubmed/33944826 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Case Report Patti, Maria Letizia De Rose, Cristina Brancato, Federica Gambacorta, Alessandro Miceli Sopo, Stefano Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title | Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title_full | Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title_short | Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
title_sort | sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944826 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pattimarialetizia sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy AT derosecristina sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy AT brancatofederica sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy AT gambacortaalessandro sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy AT micelisopostefano sensitivityofpricktestwithwalnutcommercialextractsandofprickbyprickwithrawwalnutcomparedwithopenfoodchallengeinwalnutallergy |