Cargando…

Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges

Retroviruses are obligate intracellular parasites that must integrate a copy of the viral genome into the host DNA. The integration reaction is performed by the viral enzyme integrase in complex with the two ends of the viral cDNA genome and yields an integrated provirus. Retroviral vector particles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoder, Kristine E., Rabe, Anthony J., Fishel, Richard, Larue, Ross C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.662331
_version_ 1783698048274137088
author Yoder, Kristine E.
Rabe, Anthony J.
Fishel, Richard
Larue, Ross C.
author_facet Yoder, Kristine E.
Rabe, Anthony J.
Fishel, Richard
Larue, Ross C.
author_sort Yoder, Kristine E.
collection PubMed
description Retroviruses are obligate intracellular parasites that must integrate a copy of the viral genome into the host DNA. The integration reaction is performed by the viral enzyme integrase in complex with the two ends of the viral cDNA genome and yields an integrated provirus. Retroviral vector particles are attractive gene therapy delivery tools due to their stable integration. However, some retroviral integration events may dysregulate host oncogenes leading to cancer in gene therapy patients. Multiple strategies to target retroviral integration, particularly to genetic safe harbors, have been tested with limited success. Attempts to target integration may be limited by the multimerization of integrase or the presence of host co-factors for integration. Several retroviral integration complexes have evolved a mechanism of tethering to chromatin via a host protein. Integration host co-factors bind chromatin, anchoring the complex and allowing integration. The tethering factor allows for both close proximity to the target DNA and specificity of targeting. Each retrovirus appears to have distinct preferences for DNA sequence and chromatin features at the integration site. Tethering factors determine the preference for chromatin features, but do not affect the subtle sequence preference at the integration site. The sequence preference is likely intrinsic to the integrase protein. New developments may uncouple the requirement for a tethering factor and increase the ability to redirect retroviral integration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81499072021-05-27 Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges Yoder, Kristine E. Rabe, Anthony J. Fishel, Richard Larue, Ross C. Front Mol Biosci Molecular Biosciences Retroviruses are obligate intracellular parasites that must integrate a copy of the viral genome into the host DNA. The integration reaction is performed by the viral enzyme integrase in complex with the two ends of the viral cDNA genome and yields an integrated provirus. Retroviral vector particles are attractive gene therapy delivery tools due to their stable integration. However, some retroviral integration events may dysregulate host oncogenes leading to cancer in gene therapy patients. Multiple strategies to target retroviral integration, particularly to genetic safe harbors, have been tested with limited success. Attempts to target integration may be limited by the multimerization of integrase or the presence of host co-factors for integration. Several retroviral integration complexes have evolved a mechanism of tethering to chromatin via a host protein. Integration host co-factors bind chromatin, anchoring the complex and allowing integration. The tethering factor allows for both close proximity to the target DNA and specificity of targeting. Each retrovirus appears to have distinct preferences for DNA sequence and chromatin features at the integration site. Tethering factors determine the preference for chromatin features, but do not affect the subtle sequence preference at the integration site. The sequence preference is likely intrinsic to the integrase protein. New developments may uncouple the requirement for a tethering factor and increase the ability to redirect retroviral integration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8149907/ /pubmed/34055882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.662331 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yoder, Rabe, Fishel and Larue. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Molecular Biosciences
Yoder, Kristine E.
Rabe, Anthony J.
Fishel, Richard
Larue, Ross C.
Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title_full Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title_fullStr Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title_short Strategies for Targeting Retroviral Integration for Safer Gene Therapy: Advances and Challenges
title_sort strategies for targeting retroviral integration for safer gene therapy: advances and challenges
topic Molecular Biosciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.662331
work_keys_str_mv AT yoderkristinee strategiesfortargetingretroviralintegrationforsafergenetherapyadvancesandchallenges
AT rabeanthonyj strategiesfortargetingretroviralintegrationforsafergenetherapyadvancesandchallenges
AT fishelrichard strategiesfortargetingretroviralintegrationforsafergenetherapyadvancesandchallenges
AT laruerossc strategiesfortargetingretroviralintegrationforsafergenetherapyadvancesandchallenges