Cargando…
US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study
Despite growing evidence of the environmental and public health threats posed by today’s intensive animal production, consumers in the west remain largely attached to meat. Cultivated meat offers a way to grow meat directly from cells, circumventing these issues as well as the use of animals altoget...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34064740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051050 |
_version_ | 1783698239732580352 |
---|---|
author | Szejda, Keri Bryant, Christopher J. Urbanovich, Tessa |
author_facet | Szejda, Keri Bryant, Christopher J. Urbanovich, Tessa |
author_sort | Szejda, Keri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite growing evidence of the environmental and public health threats posed by today’s intensive animal production, consumers in the west remain largely attached to meat. Cultivated meat offers a way to grow meat directly from cells, circumventing these issues as well as the use of animals altogether. The aim of this study was to assess the overall consumer markets and a range of preferences around cultivated meat in the US and the UK relating to nomenclature, genetic modification, health enhancements, and other features. To this end, we recruited large representative samples to participate in an online survey about cultivated meat, and subsequently analyzed segments (a) in the early majority population (guided by the Diffusion of Innovations Model), (b) by generation, and (c) in the general population. Our findings showed a high level of openness (80%) in both the US and UK populations, with 40% somewhat or moderately likely to try and 40% highly likely to try. Younger generations had the greatest openness: 88% of Gen Z, 85% of Millennials, 77% of Gen X, and 72% of Baby Boomers were at least somewhat open to trying cultivated meat. All segments envisioned cultivated meat to be nearly half of their total meat intake. Findings show that consumers prefer the terms ‘cultured’ and ‘cultivated’ over ‘cell-based’ and ‘cell-cultured’ for use in a social context and on packages, even though they perceive these terms as less descriptive. The most important on-package label was one indicating government assurances, and participants preferred non-GM products over GM products. We also found that US consumers prefer nutritionally superior meat over nutritionally equivalent meat. We discuss implications for product development, messaging, and understanding the likely adoption path of this food innovation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8150824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81508242021-05-27 US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study Szejda, Keri Bryant, Christopher J. Urbanovich, Tessa Foods Article Despite growing evidence of the environmental and public health threats posed by today’s intensive animal production, consumers in the west remain largely attached to meat. Cultivated meat offers a way to grow meat directly from cells, circumventing these issues as well as the use of animals altogether. The aim of this study was to assess the overall consumer markets and a range of preferences around cultivated meat in the US and the UK relating to nomenclature, genetic modification, health enhancements, and other features. To this end, we recruited large representative samples to participate in an online survey about cultivated meat, and subsequently analyzed segments (a) in the early majority population (guided by the Diffusion of Innovations Model), (b) by generation, and (c) in the general population. Our findings showed a high level of openness (80%) in both the US and UK populations, with 40% somewhat or moderately likely to try and 40% highly likely to try. Younger generations had the greatest openness: 88% of Gen Z, 85% of Millennials, 77% of Gen X, and 72% of Baby Boomers were at least somewhat open to trying cultivated meat. All segments envisioned cultivated meat to be nearly half of their total meat intake. Findings show that consumers prefer the terms ‘cultured’ and ‘cultivated’ over ‘cell-based’ and ‘cell-cultured’ for use in a social context and on packages, even though they perceive these terms as less descriptive. The most important on-package label was one indicating government assurances, and participants preferred non-GM products over GM products. We also found that US consumers prefer nutritionally superior meat over nutritionally equivalent meat. We discuss implications for product development, messaging, and understanding the likely adoption path of this food innovation. MDPI 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8150824/ /pubmed/34064740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051050 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Szejda, Keri Bryant, Christopher J. Urbanovich, Tessa US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title | US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title_full | US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title_fullStr | US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title_short | US and UK Consumer Adoption of Cultivated Meat: A Segmentation Study |
title_sort | us and uk consumer adoption of cultivated meat: a segmentation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34064740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szejdakeri usandukconsumeradoptionofcultivatedmeatasegmentationstudy AT bryantchristopherj usandukconsumeradoptionofcultivatedmeatasegmentationstudy AT urbanovichtessa usandukconsumeradoptionofcultivatedmeatasegmentationstudy |