Cargando…

Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The bacteria that contaminate meat after the death of the animal can come from multiple sources, such as the animal itself, the external environment and the operator who handles it. The prompt refrigeration of hunted game is generally considered an important step to prevent spoilage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cenci-Goga, Beniamino, Amicabile, Alberto, Karama, Musafiri, El-Ashram, Saeed, Saraiva, Cristina, García-Díez, Juan, Finotti, Simone, Genna, Viviana, Moretti, Giampaolo, Murari, Riccardo, Muliari, Riccardo, Bonizzato, Sabrina, Lugoboni, Erica, Cassini, Sabina, Dal-Ben, Caterina, Grispoldi, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051434
_version_ 1783699489231470592
author Cenci-Goga, Beniamino
Amicabile, Alberto
Karama, Musafiri
El-Ashram, Saeed
Saraiva, Cristina
García-Díez, Juan
Finotti, Simone
Genna, Viviana
Moretti, Giampaolo
Murari, Riccardo
Muliari, Riccardo
Bonizzato, Sabrina
Lugoboni, Erica
Cassini, Sabina
Dal-Ben, Caterina
Grispoldi, Luca
author_facet Cenci-Goga, Beniamino
Amicabile, Alberto
Karama, Musafiri
El-Ashram, Saeed
Saraiva, Cristina
García-Díez, Juan
Finotti, Simone
Genna, Viviana
Moretti, Giampaolo
Murari, Riccardo
Muliari, Riccardo
Bonizzato, Sabrina
Lugoboni, Erica
Cassini, Sabina
Dal-Ben, Caterina
Grispoldi, Luca
author_sort Cenci-Goga, Beniamino
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The bacteria that contaminate meat after the death of the animal can come from multiple sources, such as the animal itself, the external environment and the operator who handles it. The prompt refrigeration of hunted game is generally considered an important step to prevent spoilage and meat alterations, although many logistic hindrances, such as animal weight and distance from the hunting area to the refrigerators, limit the meticulous adoption of the best procedures. We show that the bacterial population of wild boar carcasses is not correlated to the mere time from shot to refrigeration but is correlated to the refrigeration time from chilling to analysis. The results of our study revealed a correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis but a lack of correlation between the time from shot to refrigeration. ABSTRACT: The immediate refrigeration of meat after slaughter is a key issue for the proper storage and aging of meat. The industry standard cold chain relies on low temperatures and ventilation to lower the internal carcass temperature to 0–4 °C within the first 48 h, i.e., within four times the so-called semi-cooling time. On the other hand, for games, once bled and eviscerated, the carcass must be sent to a point where it can be sectioned or kept on air for maturation at refrigeration temperature. The precautions to observe are few and simple but essential: protect the meat and start the cooling process quickly. After preparing the animal (bleeding and evisceration), it may be necessary to face a period of transport that is sometimes long and not very easy; while small animals can be easily transported in a backpack, larger ones must necessarily be carried by several people or sometimes dragged to the vehicle capable of transporting them. It is obvious that a wild boar opened from the jaws to the pelvis and dragged for hundreds of meters will tend to be contaminated, although these contaminations are to be considered secondary for the preservation of the meat, compared to contamination by the intestinal contents. In an attempt to investigate the effect of delayed refrigeration on wild boar carcass contamination, the aim of this work was to determine a correlation between several hunting and logistic parameters (age, sex, animal weight, shooting distance, number of shots, weather and temperature and time from shot to refrigeration and to analysis) and bacterial contamination of the carcass. The correlation coefficient, r, was found to be 0.038 for the eviscerated body weight (p < 0.05), 0.091 for the external temperature on the day of hunting (p < 0.05), 0.027 for the time from shot to refrigeration (p = 0.081), 0.038 for the time from refrigeration to analysis (p < 0.05) and 0.043 for the time from shot to analysis (p < 0.05). These results stand for a negative correlation between the bacterial population and eviscerated carcass weight and between the bacterial population and external temperature and for a positive correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis. No association was demonstrated between the bacterial population and the time from shot to refrigeration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8156622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81566222021-05-28 Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) Cenci-Goga, Beniamino Amicabile, Alberto Karama, Musafiri El-Ashram, Saeed Saraiva, Cristina García-Díez, Juan Finotti, Simone Genna, Viviana Moretti, Giampaolo Murari, Riccardo Muliari, Riccardo Bonizzato, Sabrina Lugoboni, Erica Cassini, Sabina Dal-Ben, Caterina Grispoldi, Luca Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The bacteria that contaminate meat after the death of the animal can come from multiple sources, such as the animal itself, the external environment and the operator who handles it. The prompt refrigeration of hunted game is generally considered an important step to prevent spoilage and meat alterations, although many logistic hindrances, such as animal weight and distance from the hunting area to the refrigerators, limit the meticulous adoption of the best procedures. We show that the bacterial population of wild boar carcasses is not correlated to the mere time from shot to refrigeration but is correlated to the refrigeration time from chilling to analysis. The results of our study revealed a correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis but a lack of correlation between the time from shot to refrigeration. ABSTRACT: The immediate refrigeration of meat after slaughter is a key issue for the proper storage and aging of meat. The industry standard cold chain relies on low temperatures and ventilation to lower the internal carcass temperature to 0–4 °C within the first 48 h, i.e., within four times the so-called semi-cooling time. On the other hand, for games, once bled and eviscerated, the carcass must be sent to a point where it can be sectioned or kept on air for maturation at refrigeration temperature. The precautions to observe are few and simple but essential: protect the meat and start the cooling process quickly. After preparing the animal (bleeding and evisceration), it may be necessary to face a period of transport that is sometimes long and not very easy; while small animals can be easily transported in a backpack, larger ones must necessarily be carried by several people or sometimes dragged to the vehicle capable of transporting them. It is obvious that a wild boar opened from the jaws to the pelvis and dragged for hundreds of meters will tend to be contaminated, although these contaminations are to be considered secondary for the preservation of the meat, compared to contamination by the intestinal contents. In an attempt to investigate the effect of delayed refrigeration on wild boar carcass contamination, the aim of this work was to determine a correlation between several hunting and logistic parameters (age, sex, animal weight, shooting distance, number of shots, weather and temperature and time from shot to refrigeration and to analysis) and bacterial contamination of the carcass. The correlation coefficient, r, was found to be 0.038 for the eviscerated body weight (p < 0.05), 0.091 for the external temperature on the day of hunting (p < 0.05), 0.027 for the time from shot to refrigeration (p = 0.081), 0.038 for the time from refrigeration to analysis (p < 0.05) and 0.043 for the time from shot to analysis (p < 0.05). These results stand for a negative correlation between the bacterial population and eviscerated carcass weight and between the bacterial population and external temperature and for a positive correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis. No association was demonstrated between the bacterial population and the time from shot to refrigeration. MDPI 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8156622/ /pubmed/34067688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051434 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cenci-Goga, Beniamino
Amicabile, Alberto
Karama, Musafiri
El-Ashram, Saeed
Saraiva, Cristina
García-Díez, Juan
Finotti, Simone
Genna, Viviana
Moretti, Giampaolo
Murari, Riccardo
Muliari, Riccardo
Bonizzato, Sabrina
Lugoboni, Erica
Cassini, Sabina
Dal-Ben, Caterina
Grispoldi, Luca
Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_full Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_fullStr Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_short Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_sort effect of delayed refrigeration on the microbial carcass contamination of wild boars (sus scrofa)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051434
work_keys_str_mv AT cencigogabeniamino effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT amicabilealberto effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT karamamusafiri effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT elashramsaeed effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT saraivacristina effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT garciadiezjuan effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT finottisimone effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT gennaviviana effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT morettigiampaolo effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT muraririccardo effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT muliaririccardo effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT bonizzatosabrina effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT lugobonierica effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT cassinisabina effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT dalbencaterina effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa
AT grispoldiluca effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarssusscrofa