Cargando…

Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal

Why can we still not translate preclinical research to clinical treatments for acute strokes? Despite > 1000 successful preclinical studies, drugs, and concepts for acute stroke, only two have reached clinical translation. This is the translational block. Yet, we continue to routinely model strok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lourbopoulos, Athanasios, Mourouzis, Iordanis, Xinaris, Christodoulos, Zerva, Nefeli, Filippakis, Konstantinos, Pavlopoulos, Angelos, Pantos, Constantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.652403
_version_ 1783700239341846528
author Lourbopoulos, Athanasios
Mourouzis, Iordanis
Xinaris, Christodoulos
Zerva, Nefeli
Filippakis, Konstantinos
Pavlopoulos, Angelos
Pantos, Constantinos
author_facet Lourbopoulos, Athanasios
Mourouzis, Iordanis
Xinaris, Christodoulos
Zerva, Nefeli
Filippakis, Konstantinos
Pavlopoulos, Angelos
Pantos, Constantinos
author_sort Lourbopoulos, Athanasios
collection PubMed
description Why can we still not translate preclinical research to clinical treatments for acute strokes? Despite > 1000 successful preclinical studies, drugs, and concepts for acute stroke, only two have reached clinical translation. This is the translational block. Yet, we continue to routinely model strokes using almost the same concepts we have used for over 30 years. Methodological improvements and criteria from the last decade have shed some light but have not solved the problem. In this conceptual analysis, we review the current status and reappraise it by thinking “out-of-the-box” and over the edges. As such, we query why other scientific fields have also faced the same translational failures, to find common denominators. In parallel, we query how migraine, multiple sclerosis, and hypothermia in hypoxic encephalopathy have achieved significant translation successes. Should we view ischemic stroke as a “chronic, relapsing, vascular” disease, then secondary prevention strategies are also a successful translation. Finally, based on the lessons learned, we propose how stroke should be modeled, and how preclinical and clinical scientists, editors, grant reviewers, and industry should reconsider their routine way of conducting research. Translational success for stroke treatments may eventually require a bold change with solutions that are outside of the box.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81602332021-05-29 Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal Lourbopoulos, Athanasios Mourouzis, Iordanis Xinaris, Christodoulos Zerva, Nefeli Filippakis, Konstantinos Pavlopoulos, Angelos Pantos, Constantinos Front Neurosci Neuroscience Why can we still not translate preclinical research to clinical treatments for acute strokes? Despite > 1000 successful preclinical studies, drugs, and concepts for acute stroke, only two have reached clinical translation. This is the translational block. Yet, we continue to routinely model strokes using almost the same concepts we have used for over 30 years. Methodological improvements and criteria from the last decade have shed some light but have not solved the problem. In this conceptual analysis, we review the current status and reappraise it by thinking “out-of-the-box” and over the edges. As such, we query why other scientific fields have also faced the same translational failures, to find common denominators. In parallel, we query how migraine, multiple sclerosis, and hypothermia in hypoxic encephalopathy have achieved significant translation successes. Should we view ischemic stroke as a “chronic, relapsing, vascular” disease, then secondary prevention strategies are also a successful translation. Finally, based on the lessons learned, we propose how stroke should be modeled, and how preclinical and clinical scientists, editors, grant reviewers, and industry should reconsider their routine way of conducting research. Translational success for stroke treatments may eventually require a bold change with solutions that are outside of the box. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8160233/ /pubmed/34054413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.652403 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lourbopoulos, Mourouzis, Xinaris, Zerva, Filippakis, Pavlopoulos and Pantos. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lourbopoulos, Athanasios
Mourouzis, Iordanis
Xinaris, Christodoulos
Zerva, Nefeli
Filippakis, Konstantinos
Pavlopoulos, Angelos
Pantos, Constantinos
Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title_full Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title_fullStr Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title_full_unstemmed Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title_short Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
title_sort translational block in stroke: a constructive and “out-of-the-box” reappraisal
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.652403
work_keys_str_mv AT lourbopoulosathanasios translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT mourouzisiordanis translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT xinarischristodoulos translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT zervanefeli translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT filippakiskonstantinos translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT pavlopoulosangelos translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal
AT pantosconstantinos translationalblockinstrokeaconstructiveandoutoftheboxreappraisal