Cargando…
Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates
Employing self-labelling protein tags for the attachment of fluorescent dyes has become a routine and powerful technique in optical microscopy to visualize and track fused proteins. However, membrane permeability of the dyes and the associated background signals can interfere with the analysis of ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc02794d |
_version_ | 1783700904139030528 |
---|---|
author | Poc, Pascal Gutzeit, Vanessa A. Ast, Julia Lee, Joon Jones, Ben J. D'Este, Elisa Mathes, Bettina Lehmann, Martin Hodson, David J. Levitz, Joshua Broichhagen, Johannes |
author_facet | Poc, Pascal Gutzeit, Vanessa A. Ast, Julia Lee, Joon Jones, Ben J. D'Este, Elisa Mathes, Bettina Lehmann, Martin Hodson, David J. Levitz, Joshua Broichhagen, Johannes |
author_sort | Poc, Pascal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Employing self-labelling protein tags for the attachment of fluorescent dyes has become a routine and powerful technique in optical microscopy to visualize and track fused proteins. However, membrane permeability of the dyes and the associated background signals can interfere with the analysis of extracellular labelling sites. Here we describe a novel approach to improve extracellular labelling by functionalizing the SNAP-tag substrate benzyl guanine (“BG”) with a charged sulfonate (“SBG”). This chemical manipulation can be applied to any SNAP-tag substrate, improves solubility, reduces non-specific staining and renders the bioconjugation handle impermeable while leaving its cargo untouched. We report SBG-conjugated fluorophores across the visible spectrum, which cleanly label SNAP-fused proteins in the plasma membrane of living cells. We demonstrate the utility of SBG-conjugated fluorophores to interrogate class A, B and C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using a range of imaging approaches including nanoscopic superresolution imaging, analysis of GPCR trafficking from intra- and extracellular pools, in vivo labelling in mouse brain and analysis of receptor stoichiometry using single molecule pull down. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8163392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81633922021-06-11 Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates Poc, Pascal Gutzeit, Vanessa A. Ast, Julia Lee, Joon Jones, Ben J. D'Este, Elisa Mathes, Bettina Lehmann, Martin Hodson, David J. Levitz, Joshua Broichhagen, Johannes Chem Sci Chemistry Employing self-labelling protein tags for the attachment of fluorescent dyes has become a routine and powerful technique in optical microscopy to visualize and track fused proteins. However, membrane permeability of the dyes and the associated background signals can interfere with the analysis of extracellular labelling sites. Here we describe a novel approach to improve extracellular labelling by functionalizing the SNAP-tag substrate benzyl guanine (“BG”) with a charged sulfonate (“SBG”). This chemical manipulation can be applied to any SNAP-tag substrate, improves solubility, reduces non-specific staining and renders the bioconjugation handle impermeable while leaving its cargo untouched. We report SBG-conjugated fluorophores across the visible spectrum, which cleanly label SNAP-fused proteins in the plasma membrane of living cells. We demonstrate the utility of SBG-conjugated fluorophores to interrogate class A, B and C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using a range of imaging approaches including nanoscopic superresolution imaging, analysis of GPCR trafficking from intra- and extracellular pools, in vivo labelling in mouse brain and analysis of receptor stoichiometry using single molecule pull down. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8163392/ /pubmed/34123074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc02794d Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Poc, Pascal Gutzeit, Vanessa A. Ast, Julia Lee, Joon Jones, Ben J. D'Este, Elisa Mathes, Bettina Lehmann, Martin Hodson, David J. Levitz, Joshua Broichhagen, Johannes Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title | Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title_full | Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title_fullStr | Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title_full_unstemmed | Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title_short | Interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable SNAP-tag substrates |
title_sort | interrogating surface versus intracellular transmembrane receptor populations using cell-impermeable snap-tag substrates |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc02794d |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pocpascal interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT gutzeitvanessaa interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT astjulia interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT leejoon interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT jonesbenj interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT desteelisa interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT mathesbettina interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT lehmannmartin interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT hodsondavidj interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT levitzjoshua interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates AT broichhagenjohannes interrogatingsurfaceversusintracellulartransmembranereceptorpopulationsusingcellimpermeablesnaptagsubstrates |