Cargando…
Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091 |
_version_ | 1783701736093908992 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, Nicholas R. Carlson, Rebecca B. Corbett, Amanda H. Williams, Dennis M. Rhoney, Denise H. |
author_facet | Nelson, Nicholas R. Carlson, Rebecca B. Corbett, Amanda H. Williams, Dennis M. Rhoney, Denise H. |
author_sort | Nelson, Nicholas R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review sought to summarize the breadth and depth of the use of feedback within pharmacy education and identify areas for future research. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English articles since January 2000 to identify studies related to feedback in pharmacy education. Sixty-four articles were included for analysis, stratified by moderate and major theory talk, where moderate theory talk explicitly included feedback into study design and major theory talk included feedback into both study design and analysis. Feedback was provided in Bachelor (14%), Master (15.6%), Doctor of Pharmacy (67.2%) and post-graduate programs (4.7%) on a variety of curricular objectives including communication and patient work up in didactic, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and experiential settings, and career/interview preparation in the co-curriculum. Feedback comments were mostly written in didactic courses, and both written and verbal in OSCE, experiential, and co-curricular settings. The pharmacy education feedback literature lacks depth beyond student perceptions, especially with respect to assessing the effectiveness and quality of feedback for learning. While feedback has been utilized throughout pharmacy education across myriad outcomes, several areas for inquiry exist which can inform the design of faculty and preceptor development programs, ensuring provision of effective, quality feedback to pharmacy learners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8167641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81676412021-06-02 Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review Nelson, Nicholas R. Carlson, Rebecca B. Corbett, Amanda H. Williams, Dennis M. Rhoney, Denise H. Pharmacy (Basel) Review Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review sought to summarize the breadth and depth of the use of feedback within pharmacy education and identify areas for future research. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English articles since January 2000 to identify studies related to feedback in pharmacy education. Sixty-four articles were included for analysis, stratified by moderate and major theory talk, where moderate theory talk explicitly included feedback into study design and major theory talk included feedback into both study design and analysis. Feedback was provided in Bachelor (14%), Master (15.6%), Doctor of Pharmacy (67.2%) and post-graduate programs (4.7%) on a variety of curricular objectives including communication and patient work up in didactic, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and experiential settings, and career/interview preparation in the co-curriculum. Feedback comments were mostly written in didactic courses, and both written and verbal in OSCE, experiential, and co-curricular settings. The pharmacy education feedback literature lacks depth beyond student perceptions, especially with respect to assessing the effectiveness and quality of feedback for learning. While feedback has been utilized throughout pharmacy education across myriad outcomes, several areas for inquiry exist which can inform the design of faculty and preceptor development programs, ensuring provision of effective, quality feedback to pharmacy learners. MDPI 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8167641/ /pubmed/33922513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Nelson, Nicholas R. Carlson, Rebecca B. Corbett, Amanda H. Williams, Dennis M. Rhoney, Denise H. Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title | Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | feedback for learning in pharmacy education: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonnicholasr feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview AT carlsonrebeccab feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview AT corbettamandah feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview AT williamsdennism feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview AT rhoneydeniseh feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview |