Cargando…

Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review

Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Nicholas R., Carlson, Rebecca B., Corbett, Amanda H., Williams, Dennis M., Rhoney, Denise H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091
_version_ 1783701736093908992
author Nelson, Nicholas R.
Carlson, Rebecca B.
Corbett, Amanda H.
Williams, Dennis M.
Rhoney, Denise H.
author_facet Nelson, Nicholas R.
Carlson, Rebecca B.
Corbett, Amanda H.
Williams, Dennis M.
Rhoney, Denise H.
author_sort Nelson, Nicholas R.
collection PubMed
description Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review sought to summarize the breadth and depth of the use of feedback within pharmacy education and identify areas for future research. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English articles since January 2000 to identify studies related to feedback in pharmacy education. Sixty-four articles were included for analysis, stratified by moderate and major theory talk, where moderate theory talk explicitly included feedback into study design and major theory talk included feedback into both study design and analysis. Feedback was provided in Bachelor (14%), Master (15.6%), Doctor of Pharmacy (67.2%) and post-graduate programs (4.7%) on a variety of curricular objectives including communication and patient work up in didactic, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and experiential settings, and career/interview preparation in the co-curriculum. Feedback comments were mostly written in didactic courses, and both written and verbal in OSCE, experiential, and co-curricular settings. The pharmacy education feedback literature lacks depth beyond student perceptions, especially with respect to assessing the effectiveness and quality of feedback for learning. While feedback has been utilized throughout pharmacy education across myriad outcomes, several areas for inquiry exist which can inform the design of faculty and preceptor development programs, ensuring provision of effective, quality feedback to pharmacy learners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81676412021-06-02 Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review Nelson, Nicholas R. Carlson, Rebecca B. Corbett, Amanda H. Williams, Dennis M. Rhoney, Denise H. Pharmacy (Basel) Review Feedback is an effective pedagogy aimed to create cognitive dissonance and reinforce learning as a key component of clinical training programs. Pharmacy learners receive constant feedback. However, there is limited understanding of how feedback is utilized in pharmacy education. This scoping review sought to summarize the breadth and depth of the use of feedback within pharmacy education and identify areas for future research. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English articles since January 2000 to identify studies related to feedback in pharmacy education. Sixty-four articles were included for analysis, stratified by moderate and major theory talk, where moderate theory talk explicitly included feedback into study design and major theory talk included feedback into both study design and analysis. Feedback was provided in Bachelor (14%), Master (15.6%), Doctor of Pharmacy (67.2%) and post-graduate programs (4.7%) on a variety of curricular objectives including communication and patient work up in didactic, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and experiential settings, and career/interview preparation in the co-curriculum. Feedback comments were mostly written in didactic courses, and both written and verbal in OSCE, experiential, and co-curricular settings. The pharmacy education feedback literature lacks depth beyond student perceptions, especially with respect to assessing the effectiveness and quality of feedback for learning. While feedback has been utilized throughout pharmacy education across myriad outcomes, several areas for inquiry exist which can inform the design of faculty and preceptor development programs, ensuring provision of effective, quality feedback to pharmacy learners. MDPI 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8167641/ /pubmed/33922513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Nelson, Nicholas R.
Carlson, Rebecca B.
Corbett, Amanda H.
Williams, Dennis M.
Rhoney, Denise H.
Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title_full Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title_short Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review
title_sort feedback for learning in pharmacy education: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020091
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonnicholasr feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview
AT carlsonrebeccab feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview
AT corbettamandah feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview
AT williamsdennism feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview
AT rhoneydeniseh feedbackforlearninginpharmacyeducationascopingreview