Cargando…
Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mosby
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025 |
_version_ | 1783701961460154368 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Nandinee Adelman, Daniel C. Anagnostou, Katherine Baumert, Joseph L. Blom, W. Marty Campbell, Dianne E. Chinthrajah, R. Sharon Mills, E.N. Clare Javed, Bushra Purington, Natasha Remington, Benjamin C. Sampson, Hugh A. Smith, Alexander D. Yarham, Ross A.R. Turner, Paul J. |
author_facet | Patel, Nandinee Adelman, Daniel C. Anagnostou, Katherine Baumert, Joseph L. Blom, W. Marty Campbell, Dianne E. Chinthrajah, R. Sharon Mills, E.N. Clare Javed, Bushra Purington, Natasha Remington, Benjamin C. Sampson, Hugh A. Smith, Alexander D. Yarham, Ross A.R. Turner, Paul J. |
author_sort | Patel, Nandinee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are generated from food challenge, but the frequency of anaphylaxis in response to these low levels of allergen exposure and their reproducibility are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine (1) the rate of anaphylaxis in response to low-level peanut exposure and (2) the reproducibility of reaction thresholds (and anaphylaxis) at food challenge. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that reported at least 50 individuals with peanut allergy reacting to peanut at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and were published between January 2010 and September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed by using National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included (covering a total of 3151 participants, 534 of whom subsequently underwent further peanut challenge). At individual participant data meta-analysis, 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 10.1%) of individuals reacted to 5 mg or less of peanut protein with anaphylaxis (moderate heterogeneity [I(2) = 57%]). Intraindividual thresholds varied by up to 3 logs, although this variation was limited to a half-log change in 71.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 82.6%) of individuals. In all, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%) of patients initially tolerated 5 mg of peanut protein but then reacted to this dose at subsequent challenge (low heterogeneity [I(2) = 16%]); none developed anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Around 5% of individuals reacting to an ED(01) or ED(05) level of exposure to peanut might develop anaphylaxis in response to that dose. This equates to 1 and 6 anaphylaxis events per 2500 patients exposed to an ED(01) or ED(05) dose, respectively, in the broader population of individuals with peanut allergy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8168954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mosby |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81689542021-06-05 Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis Patel, Nandinee Adelman, Daniel C. Anagnostou, Katherine Baumert, Joseph L. Blom, W. Marty Campbell, Dianne E. Chinthrajah, R. Sharon Mills, E.N. Clare Javed, Bushra Purington, Natasha Remington, Benjamin C. Sampson, Hugh A. Smith, Alexander D. Yarham, Ross A.R. Turner, Paul J. J Allergy Clin Immunol Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are generated from food challenge, but the frequency of anaphylaxis in response to these low levels of allergen exposure and their reproducibility are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine (1) the rate of anaphylaxis in response to low-level peanut exposure and (2) the reproducibility of reaction thresholds (and anaphylaxis) at food challenge. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that reported at least 50 individuals with peanut allergy reacting to peanut at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and were published between January 2010 and September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed by using National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included (covering a total of 3151 participants, 534 of whom subsequently underwent further peanut challenge). At individual participant data meta-analysis, 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 10.1%) of individuals reacted to 5 mg or less of peanut protein with anaphylaxis (moderate heterogeneity [I(2) = 57%]). Intraindividual thresholds varied by up to 3 logs, although this variation was limited to a half-log change in 71.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 82.6%) of individuals. In all, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%) of patients initially tolerated 5 mg of peanut protein but then reacted to this dose at subsequent challenge (low heterogeneity [I(2) = 16%]); none developed anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Around 5% of individuals reacting to an ED(01) or ED(05) level of exposure to peanut might develop anaphylaxis in response to that dose. This equates to 1 and 6 anaphylaxis events per 2500 patients exposed to an ED(01) or ED(05) dose, respectively, in the broader population of individuals with peanut allergy. Mosby 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8168954/ /pubmed/33571537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease Patel, Nandinee Adelman, Daniel C. Anagnostou, Katherine Baumert, Joseph L. Blom, W. Marty Campbell, Dianne E. Chinthrajah, R. Sharon Mills, E.N. Clare Javed, Bushra Purington, Natasha Remington, Benjamin C. Sampson, Hugh A. Smith, Alexander D. Yarham, Ross A.R. Turner, Paul J. Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title | Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full | Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_short | Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
title_sort | using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis |
topic | Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelnandinee usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT adelmandanielc usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT anagnostoukatherine usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT baumertjosephl usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT blomwmarty usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT campbelldiannee usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT chinthrajahrsharon usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT millsenclare usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT javedbushra usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT puringtonnatasha usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT remingtonbenjaminc usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT sampsonhugha usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT smithalexanderd usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT yarhamrossar usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis AT turnerpaulj usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis |