Cargando…

Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nandinee, Adelman, Daniel C., Anagnostou, Katherine, Baumert, Joseph L., Blom, W. Marty, Campbell, Dianne E., Chinthrajah, R. Sharon, Mills, E.N. Clare, Javed, Bushra, Purington, Natasha, Remington, Benjamin C., Sampson, Hugh A., Smith, Alexander D., Yarham, Ross A.R., Turner, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025
_version_ 1783701961460154368
author Patel, Nandinee
Adelman, Daniel C.
Anagnostou, Katherine
Baumert, Joseph L.
Blom, W. Marty
Campbell, Dianne E.
Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
Mills, E.N. Clare
Javed, Bushra
Purington, Natasha
Remington, Benjamin C.
Sampson, Hugh A.
Smith, Alexander D.
Yarham, Ross A.R.
Turner, Paul J.
author_facet Patel, Nandinee
Adelman, Daniel C.
Anagnostou, Katherine
Baumert, Joseph L.
Blom, W. Marty
Campbell, Dianne E.
Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
Mills, E.N. Clare
Javed, Bushra
Purington, Natasha
Remington, Benjamin C.
Sampson, Hugh A.
Smith, Alexander D.
Yarham, Ross A.R.
Turner, Paul J.
author_sort Patel, Nandinee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are generated from food challenge, but the frequency of anaphylaxis in response to these low levels of allergen exposure and their reproducibility are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine (1) the rate of anaphylaxis in response to low-level peanut exposure and (2) the reproducibility of reaction thresholds (and anaphylaxis) at food challenge. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that reported at least 50 individuals with peanut allergy reacting to peanut at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and were published between January 2010 and September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed by using National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included (covering a total of 3151 participants, 534 of whom subsequently underwent further peanut challenge). At individual participant data meta-analysis, 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 10.1%) of individuals reacted to 5 mg or less of peanut protein with anaphylaxis (moderate heterogeneity [I(2) = 57%]). Intraindividual thresholds varied by up to 3 logs, although this variation was limited to a half-log change in 71.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 82.6%) of individuals. In all, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%) of patients initially tolerated 5 mg of peanut protein but then reacted to this dose at subsequent challenge (low heterogeneity [I(2) = 16%]); none developed anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Around 5% of individuals reacting to an ED(01) or ED(05) level of exposure to peanut might develop anaphylaxis in response to that dose. This equates to 1 and 6 anaphylaxis events per 2500 patients exposed to an ED(01) or ED(05) dose, respectively, in the broader population of individuals with peanut allergy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8168954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mosby
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81689542021-06-05 Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis Patel, Nandinee Adelman, Daniel C. Anagnostou, Katherine Baumert, Joseph L. Blom, W. Marty Campbell, Dianne E. Chinthrajah, R. Sharon Mills, E.N. Clare Javed, Bushra Purington, Natasha Remington, Benjamin C. Sampson, Hugh A. Smith, Alexander D. Yarham, Ross A.R. Turner, Paul J. J Allergy Clin Immunol Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease BACKGROUND: Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED(01) or ED(05) values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are generated from food challenge, but the frequency of anaphylaxis in response to these low levels of allergen exposure and their reproducibility are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine (1) the rate of anaphylaxis in response to low-level peanut exposure and (2) the reproducibility of reaction thresholds (and anaphylaxis) at food challenge. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that reported at least 50 individuals with peanut allergy reacting to peanut at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and were published between January 2010 and September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed by using National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included (covering a total of 3151 participants, 534 of whom subsequently underwent further peanut challenge). At individual participant data meta-analysis, 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 10.1%) of individuals reacted to 5 mg or less of peanut protein with anaphylaxis (moderate heterogeneity [I(2) = 57%]). Intraindividual thresholds varied by up to 3 logs, although this variation was limited to a half-log change in 71.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 82.6%) of individuals. In all, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%) of patients initially tolerated 5 mg of peanut protein but then reacted to this dose at subsequent challenge (low heterogeneity [I(2) = 16%]); none developed anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Around 5% of individuals reacting to an ED(01) or ED(05) level of exposure to peanut might develop anaphylaxis in response to that dose. This equates to 1 and 6 anaphylaxis events per 2500 patients exposed to an ED(01) or ED(05) dose, respectively, in the broader population of individuals with peanut allergy. Mosby 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8168954/ /pubmed/33571537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease
Patel, Nandinee
Adelman, Daniel C.
Anagnostou, Katherine
Baumert, Joseph L.
Blom, W. Marty
Campbell, Dianne E.
Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
Mills, E.N. Clare
Javed, Bushra
Purington, Natasha
Remington, Benjamin C.
Sampson, Hugh A.
Smith, Alexander D.
Yarham, Ross A.R.
Turner, Paul J.
Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title_fullStr Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title_short Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
title_sort using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis
topic Food Allergy and Gastrointestinal Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnandinee usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT adelmandanielc usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT anagnostoukatherine usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT baumertjosephl usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT blomwmarty usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT campbelldiannee usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT chinthrajahrsharon usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT millsenclare usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT javedbushra usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT puringtonnatasha usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT remingtonbenjaminc usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT sampsonhugha usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT smithalexanderd usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT yarhamrossar usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT turnerpaulj usingdatafromfoodchallengestoinformmanagementofconsumerswithfoodallergyasystematicreviewwithindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis