Cargando…
Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8 |
_version_ | 1783702079035932672 |
---|---|
author | Hupe, Anke Naether, Franziska Haase, Thorsten Bruns, Christian Heß, Jürgen Dyckmans, Jens Joergensen, Rainer Georg Wichern, Florian |
author_facet | Hupe, Anke Naether, Franziska Haase, Thorsten Bruns, Christian Heß, Jürgen Dyckmans, Jens Joergensen, Rainer Georg Wichern, Florian |
author_sort | Hupe, Anke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) transfer from peas to triticale by (1) direct root contact (= R), (2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; = A), and (3) diffusion (= D). Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Frisson and P2) and triticale (Triticum × Secale cv. Benetto) plants as intercrop were grown for 105 days. Treatment ADR enabled all transfer paths between the two crops. Treatment AD with root exclusion enabled AMF and diffusion transfer between peas and triticale. Treatment A with a diffusion gap barrier only allowed AMF transfer. Pea plants were labelled every 14 days with a (13)C glucose and (15)N urea solution, using the cotton wick technique. Direct root contact resulted in the highest pea rhizodeposition and thus the largest absolute amounts of N and C transfer to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed composition of rhizodeposits from fine root residues towards root exudates. Pea plant-N consisted of 17% N derived from rhizodeposition (NdfR) in treatment ADR but only 8% in the treatments AD and A, independently of pea variety, whereas pea plant-C consisted of 13% C derived from rhizodeposition (CdfR), without pea variety and transfer path treatment effects. Averaging all transfer path treatments, 6.7% of NdfR and 2.7% of CdfR was transferred from Frisson and P2 to triticale plants. Approximately 90% of this NdfR was transferred by direct root contact from Frisson to triticale and only 10% by AMF, whereas only 55% of CdfR was transferred to triticale by direct root contact, 40% by AMF and 5% by diffusion. Similar percentages were transferred from mutant P2 to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed RD composition from fine root residues towards root exudates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8169652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81696522021-06-02 Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza Hupe, Anke Naether, Franziska Haase, Thorsten Bruns, Christian Heß, Jürgen Dyckmans, Jens Joergensen, Rainer Georg Wichern, Florian Sci Rep Article Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) transfer from peas to triticale by (1) direct root contact (= R), (2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; = A), and (3) diffusion (= D). Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Frisson and P2) and triticale (Triticum × Secale cv. Benetto) plants as intercrop were grown for 105 days. Treatment ADR enabled all transfer paths between the two crops. Treatment AD with root exclusion enabled AMF and diffusion transfer between peas and triticale. Treatment A with a diffusion gap barrier only allowed AMF transfer. Pea plants were labelled every 14 days with a (13)C glucose and (15)N urea solution, using the cotton wick technique. Direct root contact resulted in the highest pea rhizodeposition and thus the largest absolute amounts of N and C transfer to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed composition of rhizodeposits from fine root residues towards root exudates. Pea plant-N consisted of 17% N derived from rhizodeposition (NdfR) in treatment ADR but only 8% in the treatments AD and A, independently of pea variety, whereas pea plant-C consisted of 13% C derived from rhizodeposition (CdfR), without pea variety and transfer path treatment effects. Averaging all transfer path treatments, 6.7% of NdfR and 2.7% of CdfR was transferred from Frisson and P2 to triticale plants. Approximately 90% of this NdfR was transferred by direct root contact from Frisson to triticale and only 10% by AMF, whereas only 55% of CdfR was transferred to triticale by direct root contact, 40% by AMF and 5% by diffusion. Similar percentages were transferred from mutant P2 to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed RD composition from fine root residues towards root exudates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8169652/ /pubmed/34075075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hupe, Anke Naether, Franziska Haase, Thorsten Bruns, Christian Heß, Jürgen Dyckmans, Jens Joergensen, Rainer Georg Wichern, Florian Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title | Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title_full | Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title_fullStr | Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title_short | Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
title_sort | evidence of considerable c and n transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hupeanke evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT naetherfranziska evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT haasethorsten evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT brunschristian evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT heßjurgen evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT dyckmansjens evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT joergensenrainergeorg evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza AT wichernflorian evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza |