Cargando…

Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza

Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hupe, Anke, Naether, Franziska, Haase, Thorsten, Bruns, Christian, Heß, Jürgen, Dyckmans, Jens, Joergensen, Rainer Georg, Wichern, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8
_version_ 1783702079035932672
author Hupe, Anke
Naether, Franziska
Haase, Thorsten
Bruns, Christian
Heß, Jürgen
Dyckmans, Jens
Joergensen, Rainer Georg
Wichern, Florian
author_facet Hupe, Anke
Naether, Franziska
Haase, Thorsten
Bruns, Christian
Heß, Jürgen
Dyckmans, Jens
Joergensen, Rainer Georg
Wichern, Florian
author_sort Hupe, Anke
collection PubMed
description Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) transfer from peas to triticale by (1) direct root contact (= R), (2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; = A), and (3) diffusion (= D). Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Frisson and P2) and triticale (Triticum × Secale cv. Benetto) plants as intercrop were grown for 105 days. Treatment ADR enabled all transfer paths between the two crops. Treatment AD with root exclusion enabled AMF and diffusion transfer between peas and triticale. Treatment A with a diffusion gap barrier only allowed AMF transfer. Pea plants were labelled every 14 days with a (13)C glucose and (15)N urea solution, using the cotton wick technique. Direct root contact resulted in the highest pea rhizodeposition and thus the largest absolute amounts of N and C transfer to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed composition of rhizodeposits from fine root residues towards root exudates. Pea plant-N consisted of 17% N derived from rhizodeposition (NdfR) in treatment ADR but only 8% in the treatments AD and A, independently of pea variety, whereas pea plant-C consisted of 13% C derived from rhizodeposition (CdfR), without pea variety and transfer path treatment effects. Averaging all transfer path treatments, 6.7% of NdfR and 2.7% of CdfR was transferred from Frisson and P2 to triticale plants. Approximately 90% of this NdfR was transferred by direct root contact from Frisson to triticale and only 10% by AMF, whereas only 55% of CdfR was transferred to triticale by direct root contact, 40% by AMF and 5% by diffusion. Similar percentages were transferred from mutant P2 to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed RD composition from fine root residues towards root exudates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8169652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81696522021-06-02 Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza Hupe, Anke Naether, Franziska Haase, Thorsten Bruns, Christian Heß, Jürgen Dyckmans, Jens Joergensen, Rainer Georg Wichern, Florian Sci Rep Article Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an important management method for improving yield stability, especially in organic farming systems. However, knowledge is restricted on the relevance of different nutrient transfer pathways. The objective of the study was to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) transfer from peas to triticale by (1) direct root contact (= R), (2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; = A), and (3) diffusion (= D). Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Frisson and P2) and triticale (Triticum × Secale cv. Benetto) plants as intercrop were grown for 105 days. Treatment ADR enabled all transfer paths between the two crops. Treatment AD with root exclusion enabled AMF and diffusion transfer between peas and triticale. Treatment A with a diffusion gap barrier only allowed AMF transfer. Pea plants were labelled every 14 days with a (13)C glucose and (15)N urea solution, using the cotton wick technique. Direct root contact resulted in the highest pea rhizodeposition and thus the largest absolute amounts of N and C transfer to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed composition of rhizodeposits from fine root residues towards root exudates. Pea plant-N consisted of 17% N derived from rhizodeposition (NdfR) in treatment ADR but only 8% in the treatments AD and A, independently of pea variety, whereas pea plant-C consisted of 13% C derived from rhizodeposition (CdfR), without pea variety and transfer path treatment effects. Averaging all transfer path treatments, 6.7% of NdfR and 2.7% of CdfR was transferred from Frisson and P2 to triticale plants. Approximately 90% of this NdfR was transferred by direct root contact from Frisson to triticale and only 10% by AMF, whereas only 55% of CdfR was transferred to triticale by direct root contact, 40% by AMF and 5% by diffusion. Similar percentages were transferred from mutant P2 to triticale. Root exclusion generally changed RD composition from fine root residues towards root exudates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8169652/ /pubmed/34075075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hupe, Anke
Naether, Franziska
Haase, Thorsten
Bruns, Christian
Heß, Jürgen
Dyckmans, Jens
Joergensen, Rainer Georg
Wichern, Florian
Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title_full Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title_fullStr Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title_short Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
title_sort evidence of considerable c and n transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90436-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hupeanke evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT naetherfranziska evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT haasethorsten evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT brunschristian evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT heßjurgen evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT dyckmansjens evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT joergensenrainergeorg evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza
AT wichernflorian evidenceofconsiderablecandntransferfrompeastocerealsviadirectrootcontactbutnotviamycorrhiza