Cargando…

Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valli, Claudia, Howatt, Victoria, Prokop-Dorner, Anna, Rabassa, Montserrat, Johnston, Bradley C., Zajac, Joanna, Han, Mi Ah, Kenji Nampo, Fernando, Guyatt, Gordon H., Bala, Malgorzata M., Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136136
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2
_version_ 1783703225253232640
author Valli, Claudia
Howatt, Victoria
Prokop-Dorner, Anna
Rabassa, Montserrat
Johnston, Bradley C.
Zajac, Joanna
Han, Mi Ah
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Bala, Malgorzata M.
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
author_facet Valli, Claudia
Howatt, Victoria
Prokop-Dorner, Anna
Rabassa, Montserrat
Johnston, Bradley C.
Zajac, Joanna
Han, Mi Ah
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Bala, Malgorzata M.
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
author_sort Valli, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individuals’ health-related values and preferences on the topic, such data would be useful in the development of recommendations regarding meat consumption. Methods and analysis: We will perform a cross-sectional mixed methods study. The study population will consist of adult omnivores currently consuming a minimum of three weekly servings of either unprocessed red meat or processed meat. We will explore participants’ willingness to stop or reduce their unprocessed red meat, or their processed meat consumption through a direct-choice exercise. This exercise will consist of presenting a scenario tailored to each individual’s average weekly consumption. That is, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the best estimate of the risk reduction in overall cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we will ask participants if they would stop their consumption, and/or reduce their average consumption. We will also present the corresponding certainty of the evidence for the potential risk reductions. Finally, we will measure their meat consumption three months after the interview and determine if they have made any changes to their average consumption. Ethics and dissemination: The research protocol was approved by the ethics committees in Canada (Research Ethics Board, Dalhousie University), Spain (Comitè Ètic d'Investigació Clínica de l'IDIAP Jordi Gol), Poland (The Bioethics Committee of the Jagiellonian University), and Brazil (National Research Ethics Commission). The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent. Results from this project will be disseminated through publications and presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8176263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81762632021-06-15 Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study Valli, Claudia Howatt, Victoria Prokop-Dorner, Anna Rabassa, Montserrat Johnston, Bradley C. Zajac, Joanna Han, Mi Ah Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guyatt, Gordon H. Bala, Malgorzata M. Alonso-Coello, Pablo F1000Res Study Protocol Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individuals’ health-related values and preferences on the topic, such data would be useful in the development of recommendations regarding meat consumption. Methods and analysis: We will perform a cross-sectional mixed methods study. The study population will consist of adult omnivores currently consuming a minimum of three weekly servings of either unprocessed red meat or processed meat. We will explore participants’ willingness to stop or reduce their unprocessed red meat, or their processed meat consumption through a direct-choice exercise. This exercise will consist of presenting a scenario tailored to each individual’s average weekly consumption. That is, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the best estimate of the risk reduction in overall cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we will ask participants if they would stop their consumption, and/or reduce their average consumption. We will also present the corresponding certainty of the evidence for the potential risk reductions. Finally, we will measure their meat consumption three months after the interview and determine if they have made any changes to their average consumption. Ethics and dissemination: The research protocol was approved by the ethics committees in Canada (Research Ethics Board, Dalhousie University), Spain (Comitè Ètic d'Investigació Clínica de l'IDIAP Jordi Gol), Poland (The Bioethics Committee of the Jagiellonian University), and Brazil (National Research Ethics Commission). The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent. Results from this project will be disseminated through publications and presentations. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8176263/ /pubmed/34136136 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Valli C et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Valli, Claudia
Howatt, Victoria
Prokop-Dorner, Anna
Rabassa, Montserrat
Johnston, Bradley C.
Zajac, Joanna
Han, Mi Ah
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Bala, Malgorzata M.
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title_full Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title_short Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
title_sort evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136136
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2
work_keys_str_mv AT valliclaudia evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT howattvictoria evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT prokopdorneranna evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT rabassamontserrat evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT johnstonbradleyc evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT zajacjoanna evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT hanmiah evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT kenjinampofernando evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT guyattgordonh evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT balamalgorzatam evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
AT alonsocoellopablo evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy