Cargando…
Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136136 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2 |
_version_ | 1783703225253232640 |
---|---|
author | Valli, Claudia Howatt, Victoria Prokop-Dorner, Anna Rabassa, Montserrat Johnston, Bradley C. Zajac, Joanna Han, Mi Ah Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guyatt, Gordon H. Bala, Malgorzata M. Alonso-Coello, Pablo |
author_facet | Valli, Claudia Howatt, Victoria Prokop-Dorner, Anna Rabassa, Montserrat Johnston, Bradley C. Zajac, Joanna Han, Mi Ah Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guyatt, Gordon H. Bala, Malgorzata M. Alonso-Coello, Pablo |
author_sort | Valli, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individuals’ health-related values and preferences on the topic, such data would be useful in the development of recommendations regarding meat consumption. Methods and analysis: We will perform a cross-sectional mixed methods study. The study population will consist of adult omnivores currently consuming a minimum of three weekly servings of either unprocessed red meat or processed meat. We will explore participants’ willingness to stop or reduce their unprocessed red meat, or their processed meat consumption through a direct-choice exercise. This exercise will consist of presenting a scenario tailored to each individual’s average weekly consumption. That is, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the best estimate of the risk reduction in overall cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we will ask participants if they would stop their consumption, and/or reduce their average consumption. We will also present the corresponding certainty of the evidence for the potential risk reductions. Finally, we will measure their meat consumption three months after the interview and determine if they have made any changes to their average consumption. Ethics and dissemination: The research protocol was approved by the ethics committees in Canada (Research Ethics Board, Dalhousie University), Spain (Comitè Ètic d'Investigació Clínica de l'IDIAP Jordi Gol), Poland (The Bioethics Committee of the Jagiellonian University), and Brazil (National Research Ethics Commission). The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent. Results from this project will be disseminated through publications and presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8176263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81762632021-06-15 Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study Valli, Claudia Howatt, Victoria Prokop-Dorner, Anna Rabassa, Montserrat Johnston, Bradley C. Zajac, Joanna Han, Mi Ah Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guyatt, Gordon H. Bala, Malgorzata M. Alonso-Coello, Pablo F1000Res Study Protocol Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individuals’ health-related values and preferences on the topic, such data would be useful in the development of recommendations regarding meat consumption. Methods and analysis: We will perform a cross-sectional mixed methods study. The study population will consist of adult omnivores currently consuming a minimum of three weekly servings of either unprocessed red meat or processed meat. We will explore participants’ willingness to stop or reduce their unprocessed red meat, or their processed meat consumption through a direct-choice exercise. This exercise will consist of presenting a scenario tailored to each individual’s average weekly consumption. That is, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the best estimate of the risk reduction in overall cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we will ask participants if they would stop their consumption, and/or reduce their average consumption. We will also present the corresponding certainty of the evidence for the potential risk reductions. Finally, we will measure their meat consumption three months after the interview and determine if they have made any changes to their average consumption. Ethics and dissemination: The research protocol was approved by the ethics committees in Canada (Research Ethics Board, Dalhousie University), Spain (Comitè Ètic d'Investigació Clínica de l'IDIAP Jordi Gol), Poland (The Bioethics Committee of the Jagiellonian University), and Brazil (National Research Ethics Commission). The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent. Results from this project will be disseminated through publications and presentations. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8176263/ /pubmed/34136136 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Valli C et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Valli, Claudia Howatt, Victoria Prokop-Dorner, Anna Rabassa, Montserrat Johnston, Bradley C. Zajac, Joanna Han, Mi Ah Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guyatt, Gordon H. Bala, Malgorzata M. Alonso-Coello, Pablo Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title | Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title_full | Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title_short | Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
title_sort | evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136136 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valliclaudia evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT howattvictoria evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT prokopdorneranna evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT rabassamontserrat evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT johnstonbradleyc evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT zajacjoanna evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT hanmiah evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT kenjinampofernando evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT guyattgordonh evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT balamalgorzatam evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT alonsocoellopablo evaluatingadultshealthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesaboutunprocessedredmeatandprocessedmeatconsumptionprotocolforacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy |