Cargando…
Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus
Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is inherently complex, posing challenges for even the most experienced urologists. Until the mid-2000s, nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was exclusively performed using variations of the open technique initiall...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159102 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.06.15 |
_version_ | 1783704836206755840 |
---|---|
author | Masic, Selma Smaldone, Marc C. |
author_facet | Masic, Selma Smaldone, Marc C. |
author_sort | Masic, Selma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is inherently complex, posing challenges for even the most experienced urologists. Until the mid-2000s, nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was exclusively performed using variations of the open technique initially described decades earlier, but since then several institutions have reported their robotic experiences. Robotic IVC thrombectomy was initially reported for level I and II thrombi, and more recently in higher-lever III thrombi. In general, the robotic approach is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to the open approach, low rates of open conversion in reported cases, relatively low rates of high-grade complications, and favorable overall survival on short-term follow-up in limited cohorts. Operative times are longer, costs are significantly higher, and left-sided tumors always require intraoperative repositioning and usually require preoperative embolization. To date, criteria for patient selection or open conversion have not been defined, and long-term oncologic outcomes are lacking. While the early published robotic experience demonstrates feasibility and safety in carefully selected patients, longer-term follow-up remains necessary. Patient selection, indications for open conversion, logistics of conversion particularly in emergent settings, necessity and safety of preoperative embolization, the value proposition, and long-term oncologic outcomes must all be clearly defined before this approach is widely adopted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81856842021-06-21 Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus Masic, Selma Smaldone, Marc C. Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is inherently complex, posing challenges for even the most experienced urologists. Until the mid-2000s, nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was exclusively performed using variations of the open technique initially described decades earlier, but since then several institutions have reported their robotic experiences. Robotic IVC thrombectomy was initially reported for level I and II thrombi, and more recently in higher-lever III thrombi. In general, the robotic approach is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to the open approach, low rates of open conversion in reported cases, relatively low rates of high-grade complications, and favorable overall survival on short-term follow-up in limited cohorts. Operative times are longer, costs are significantly higher, and left-sided tumors always require intraoperative repositioning and usually require preoperative embolization. To date, criteria for patient selection or open conversion have not been defined, and long-term oncologic outcomes are lacking. While the early published robotic experience demonstrates feasibility and safety in carefully selected patients, longer-term follow-up remains necessary. Patient selection, indications for open conversion, logistics of conversion particularly in emergent settings, necessity and safety of preoperative embolization, the value proposition, and long-term oncologic outcomes must all be clearly defined before this approach is widely adopted. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8185684/ /pubmed/34159102 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.06.15 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology Masic, Selma Smaldone, Marc C. Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title | Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title_full | Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title_fullStr | Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title_short | Robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
title_sort | robotic renal surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus |
topic | Review Article on Controversies in Minimally Invasive Urologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159102 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.06.15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masicselma roboticrenalsurgeryforrenalcellcarcinomawithinferiorvenacavathrombus AT smaldonemarcc roboticrenalsurgeryforrenalcellcarcinomawithinferiorvenacavathrombus |