Cargando…
Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant supply shortages worldwide for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis, like RNA extraction kits. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical performance and analytical sensitivity of a simple SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis protocol based on hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.038 |
_version_ | 1783710323275988992 |
---|---|
author | Bruno, Alfredo de Mora, Domenica Freire-Paspuel, Byron Rodriguez, Angel S. Paredes-Espinosa, Maria Belen Olmedo, Maritza Sanchez, Martha Romero, Jennifer Paez, Michelle Gonzalez, Manuel Orlando, Alberto Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel |
author_facet | Bruno, Alfredo de Mora, Domenica Freire-Paspuel, Byron Rodriguez, Angel S. Paredes-Espinosa, Maria Belen Olmedo, Maritza Sanchez, Martha Romero, Jennifer Paez, Michelle Gonzalez, Manuel Orlando, Alberto Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel |
author_sort | Bruno, Alfredo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant supply shortages worldwide for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis, like RNA extraction kits. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical performance and analytical sensitivity of a simple SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis protocol based on heat shock without RNA extraction using both "CDC" (N gene) and "Charite" (E gene) RT-qPCR protocols. RESULTS: 1,036 nasopharyngeal samples, 543 of them SARS-CoV-2 positive, were analyzed. The heat shock method correctly identified 68.8% (232/337) and 89.4% (202/226) of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples for N gene and E gene, respectively. Analytical sensitivity was assessed for heat shock method using the CDC RT-qPCR protocol, obtaining sensitivity values of 98.6%, 93.3% and 84.8% for limit of detection of 100.000, 50.000 and 20.000 viral RNA copies/mL of sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that a simple heat shock SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnosis method without RNA extraction is a reliable alternative for potentially infectious SARS-CoV-2 positive patients at the time of testing. This affordable protocol can help overcome the cost and supply shortages for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, especially in developing countries. In Ecuador, it has been used already by laboratories in the public health system for more than 100.000 specimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8215877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82158772021-06-21 Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR Bruno, Alfredo de Mora, Domenica Freire-Paspuel, Byron Rodriguez, Angel S. Paredes-Espinosa, Maria Belen Olmedo, Maritza Sanchez, Martha Romero, Jennifer Paez, Michelle Gonzalez, Manuel Orlando, Alberto Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel Int J Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant supply shortages worldwide for SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis, like RNA extraction kits. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical performance and analytical sensitivity of a simple SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis protocol based on heat shock without RNA extraction using both "CDC" (N gene) and "Charite" (E gene) RT-qPCR protocols. RESULTS: 1,036 nasopharyngeal samples, 543 of them SARS-CoV-2 positive, were analyzed. The heat shock method correctly identified 68.8% (232/337) and 89.4% (202/226) of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples for N gene and E gene, respectively. Analytical sensitivity was assessed for heat shock method using the CDC RT-qPCR protocol, obtaining sensitivity values of 98.6%, 93.3% and 84.8% for limit of detection of 100.000, 50.000 and 20.000 viral RNA copies/mL of sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that a simple heat shock SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnosis method without RNA extraction is a reliable alternative for potentially infectious SARS-CoV-2 positive patients at the time of testing. This affordable protocol can help overcome the cost and supply shortages for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, especially in developing countries. In Ecuador, it has been used already by laboratories in the public health system for more than 100.000 specimens. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-08 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8215877/ /pubmed/34166793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.038 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bruno, Alfredo de Mora, Domenica Freire-Paspuel, Byron Rodriguez, Angel S. Paredes-Espinosa, Maria Belen Olmedo, Maritza Sanchez, Martha Romero, Jennifer Paez, Michelle Gonzalez, Manuel Orlando, Alberto Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title | Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title_full | Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title_fullStr | Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title_short | Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR |
title_sort | analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock sars-cov-2 detection method without rna extraction for n and e genes rt-qpcr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunoalfredo analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT demoradomenica analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT freirepaspuelbyron analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT rodriguezangels analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT paredesespinosamariabelen analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT olmedomaritza analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT sanchezmartha analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT romerojennifer analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT paezmichelle analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT gonzalezmanuel analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT orlandoalberto analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr AT garciabereguiainmiguelangel analyticalandclinicalevaluationofaheatshocksarscov2detectionmethodwithoutrnaextractionfornandegenesrtqpcr |