Cargando…
Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey
IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted graduate medical education, compelling training programs to abruptly transition to virtual educational formats despite minimal experience or proficiency. We surveyed residents from a national sample of internal medicine (IM) residency programs to describe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7 |
_version_ | 1783713486063271936 |
---|---|
author | Albert, Tyler J. Bradley, Joel Starks, Helene Redinger, Jeff Arundel, Cherinne Beard, Albertine Caputo, Laura Chun, Jonathan Gunderson, Craig G. Heppe, Dan Jagannath, Anand Kent, Kyle Krug, Michael Laudate, James Palaniappan, Vignesh Pensiero, Amanda Sargsyan, Zaven Sladek, Emily Tuck, Matthew Cornia, Paul B. |
author_facet | Albert, Tyler J. Bradley, Joel Starks, Helene Redinger, Jeff Arundel, Cherinne Beard, Albertine Caputo, Laura Chun, Jonathan Gunderson, Craig G. Heppe, Dan Jagannath, Anand Kent, Kyle Krug, Michael Laudate, James Palaniappan, Vignesh Pensiero, Amanda Sargsyan, Zaven Sladek, Emily Tuck, Matthew Cornia, Paul B. |
author_sort | Albert, Tyler J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted graduate medical education, compelling training programs to abruptly transition to virtual educational formats despite minimal experience or proficiency. We surveyed residents from a national sample of internal medicine (IM) residency programs to describe their experiences with the transition to virtual morning report (MR), a highly valued core educational conference. OBJECTIVE: Assess resident views about virtual MR content and teaching strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Anonymous, web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Residents from 14 academically affiliated IM residency programs. MAIN MEASURES: The 25-item survey on virtual MR included questions on demographics; frequency and reason for attending; opinions on who should attend and teach; how the virtual format affects the learning environment; how virtual MR compares to in-person MR with regard to participation, engagement, and overall education; and whether virtual MR should continue after in-person conferences can safely resume. The survey included a combination of Likert-style, multiple option, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Six hundred fifteen residents (35%) completed the survey, with a balanced sample of interns (39%), second-year (31%), and third-year (30%) residents. When comparing their overall assessment of in-person and virtual MR formats, 42% of residents preferred in-person, 18% preferred virtual, and 40% felt they were equivalent. Most respondents endorsed better peer-engagement, camaraderie, and group participation with in-person MR. Chat boxes, video participation, audience response systems, and smart boards/tablets enhanced respondents’ educational experience during virtual MR. Most respondents (72%) felt that the option of virtual MR should continue when it is safe to resume in-person conferences. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual MR was a valued alternative to traditional in-person MR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Residents feel that the virtual platform offers unique educational benefits independent of and in conjunction with in-person conferences. Residents support the integration of a virtual platform into the delivery of MR in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8231750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82317502021-06-28 Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey Albert, Tyler J. Bradley, Joel Starks, Helene Redinger, Jeff Arundel, Cherinne Beard, Albertine Caputo, Laura Chun, Jonathan Gunderson, Craig G. Heppe, Dan Jagannath, Anand Kent, Kyle Krug, Michael Laudate, James Palaniappan, Vignesh Pensiero, Amanda Sargsyan, Zaven Sladek, Emily Tuck, Matthew Cornia, Paul B. J Gen Intern Med Original Research IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted graduate medical education, compelling training programs to abruptly transition to virtual educational formats despite minimal experience or proficiency. We surveyed residents from a national sample of internal medicine (IM) residency programs to describe their experiences with the transition to virtual morning report (MR), a highly valued core educational conference. OBJECTIVE: Assess resident views about virtual MR content and teaching strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Anonymous, web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Residents from 14 academically affiliated IM residency programs. MAIN MEASURES: The 25-item survey on virtual MR included questions on demographics; frequency and reason for attending; opinions on who should attend and teach; how the virtual format affects the learning environment; how virtual MR compares to in-person MR with regard to participation, engagement, and overall education; and whether virtual MR should continue after in-person conferences can safely resume. The survey included a combination of Likert-style, multiple option, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Six hundred fifteen residents (35%) completed the survey, with a balanced sample of interns (39%), second-year (31%), and third-year (30%) residents. When comparing their overall assessment of in-person and virtual MR formats, 42% of residents preferred in-person, 18% preferred virtual, and 40% felt they were equivalent. Most respondents endorsed better peer-engagement, camaraderie, and group participation with in-person MR. Chat boxes, video participation, audience response systems, and smart boards/tablets enhanced respondents’ educational experience during virtual MR. Most respondents (72%) felt that the option of virtual MR should continue when it is safe to resume in-person conferences. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual MR was a valued alternative to traditional in-person MR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Residents feel that the virtual platform offers unique educational benefits independent of and in conjunction with in-person conferences. Residents support the integration of a virtual platform into the delivery of MR in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-25 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8231750/ /pubmed/34173198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 |
spellingShingle | Original Research Albert, Tyler J. Bradley, Joel Starks, Helene Redinger, Jeff Arundel, Cherinne Beard, Albertine Caputo, Laura Chun, Jonathan Gunderson, Craig G. Heppe, Dan Jagannath, Anand Kent, Kyle Krug, Michael Laudate, James Palaniappan, Vignesh Pensiero, Amanda Sargsyan, Zaven Sladek, Emily Tuck, Matthew Cornia, Paul B. Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title | Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title_full | Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title_fullStr | Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title_short | Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey |
title_sort | internal medicine residents’ perceptions of virtual morning report: a multicenter survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alberttylerj internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT bradleyjoel internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT starkshelene internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT redingerjeff internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT arundelcherinne internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT beardalbertine internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT caputolaura internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT chunjonathan internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT gundersoncraigg internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT heppedan internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT jagannathanand internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT kentkyle internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT krugmichael internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT laudatejames internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT palaniappanvignesh internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT pensieroamanda internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT sargsyanzaven internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT sladekemily internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT tuckmatthew internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey AT corniapaulb internalmedicineresidentsperceptionsofvirtualmorningreportamulticentersurvey |