Cargando…
Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer
BACKGROUND: The overwhelming majority of dose-escalation clinical trials use methods that seek a maximum tolerable dose, including rule-based methods like the 3+3, and model-based methods like CRM and EWOC. These methods assume that the incidences of efficacy and toxicity always increase as dose is...
Autores principales: | Brock, Kristian, Homer, Victoria, Soul, Gurjinder, Potter, Claire, Chiuzan, Cody, Lee, Shing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34225682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08440-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dosing Exercise: Is More Really Better for Obesity Related Outcomes?
por: Malin, Steven K.
Publicado: (2018) -
Design considerations for early-phase clinical trials of immune-oncology agents
por: Wages, Nolan A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Dose-finding designs for cumulative toxicities using multiple constraints
por: Lee, Shing M, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial
por: Brock, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Optimal designs for active controlled dose-finding trials with efficacy-toxicity outcomes
por: Schorning, K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)