Cargando…
Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) enhances motor skill acquisition and motor learning in young and old adults. Since the cerebellum is involved in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD), c-tDCS may represent an intervention with potential to improve motor learning...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01297-w |
_version_ | 1783718835458670592 |
---|---|
author | de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima Pantovic, Milan Clingo, Mitchell G. Fischer, Katherine M. Jalene, Sharon Landers, Merrill R. Mari, Zoltan Poston, Brach |
author_facet | de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima Pantovic, Milan Clingo, Mitchell G. Fischer, Katherine M. Jalene, Sharon Landers, Merrill R. Mari, Zoltan Poston, Brach |
author_sort | de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) enhances motor skill acquisition and motor learning in young and old adults. Since the cerebellum is involved in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD), c-tDCS may represent an intervention with potential to improve motor learning in PD. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on motor learning in PD. The secondary purpose was to examine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on transfer of motor learning in PD. The study was a randomized, double-blind, SHAM-controlled, between-subjects design. Twenty-one participants with PD were allocated to either a tDCS group or a SHAM stimulation group. Participants completed 9 practice sessions over a 2-week period that involved extensive practice of an isometric pinch grip task (PGT) and a rapid arm movement task (AMT). These practice tasks were performed over a 25-min period concurrent with either anodal c-tDCS or SHAM stimulation. A set of transfer tasks that included clinical rating scales, manual dexterity tests, and lower extremity assessments were quantified in Test sessions at Baseline, 1, 14, and 28 days after the end of practice (EOP). There were no significant differences between the c-tDCS and SHAM groups as indicated by performance changes in the practice and transfer tasks from Baseline to the 3 EOP Tests. The findings indicate that long-term application of c-tDCS does not improve motor learning or transfer of motor learning to a greater extent than practice alone in PD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8260571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82605712021-07-07 Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima Pantovic, Milan Clingo, Mitchell G. Fischer, Katherine M. Jalene, Sharon Landers, Merrill R. Mari, Zoltan Poston, Brach Cerebellum Original Article Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) enhances motor skill acquisition and motor learning in young and old adults. Since the cerebellum is involved in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD), c-tDCS may represent an intervention with potential to improve motor learning in PD. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on motor learning in PD. The secondary purpose was to examine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on transfer of motor learning in PD. The study was a randomized, double-blind, SHAM-controlled, between-subjects design. Twenty-one participants with PD were allocated to either a tDCS group or a SHAM stimulation group. Participants completed 9 practice sessions over a 2-week period that involved extensive practice of an isometric pinch grip task (PGT) and a rapid arm movement task (AMT). These practice tasks were performed over a 25-min period concurrent with either anodal c-tDCS or SHAM stimulation. A set of transfer tasks that included clinical rating scales, manual dexterity tests, and lower extremity assessments were quantified in Test sessions at Baseline, 1, 14, and 28 days after the end of practice (EOP). There were no significant differences between the c-tDCS and SHAM groups as indicated by performance changes in the practice and transfer tasks from Baseline to the 3 EOP Tests. The findings indicate that long-term application of c-tDCS does not improve motor learning or transfer of motor learning to a greater extent than practice alone in PD. Springer US 2021-07-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8260571/ /pubmed/34232470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01297-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima Pantovic, Milan Clingo, Mitchell G. Fischer, Katherine M. Jalene, Sharon Landers, Merrill R. Mari, Zoltan Poston, Brach Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title | Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full | Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_fullStr | Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_short | Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_sort | long-term application of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve motor learning in parkinson’s disease |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8260571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01297-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dealbuquerquelidiolima longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT pantovicmilan longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT clingomitchellg longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT fischerkatherinem longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT jalenesharon longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT landersmerrillr longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT marizoltan longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease AT postonbrach longtermapplicationofcerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdoesnotimprovemotorlearninginparkinsonsdisease |