Cargando…
Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory
Virtual and augmented (VAR) technology is in the early stages of being adopted as a teaching platform in higher education. The technology can facilitate immersive learning in environments that are not usually physically accessible to students via 3D models and interactive 360° videos. To date, adopt...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6 |
_version_ | 1783719739115175936 |
---|---|
author | Marks, Benjy Thomas, Jacqueline |
author_facet | Marks, Benjy Thomas, Jacqueline |
author_sort | Marks, Benjy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Virtual and augmented (VAR) technology is in the early stages of being adopted as a teaching platform in higher education. The technology can facilitate immersive learning in environments that are not usually physically accessible to students via 3D models and interactive 360° videos. To date, adoption rates of VAR technology for teaching have not been well described across a higher education institution. Further, there is an absence of information on the optimal VAR laboratory designs and cost per student. In this study, a purpose designed virtual reality laboratory was formed in 2017 at The University of Sydney, housing 26 Oculus Rift headset units. An evaluation was conducted on the design, costs, rates of teaching adoption and student experiences over five teaching periods (2.5 years). Over this period, 4833 students were taught in the laboratory across 7952 student visits. The laboratory was used most by the Faculty of Engineering (53%), followed by the Faculty of Arts & Social Science (23.8%) and Faculty of Science (23.2%). For engineering, the units of study using the laboratory represented only 1.4% of annual faculty subjects offered. This confirms that adoption was in the initial stage of innovation diffusion. The laboratory saw a 250% increase in student numbers over the period of evaluation and 71.5% of students surveyed (n = 295) reported enhanced learning outcomes. The cost per visit was only AU$ 19.50. These findings give confidence to higher education institutions that the right VAR technology infrastructure is a sound educational investment for the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8265284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82652842021-07-09 Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory Marks, Benjy Thomas, Jacqueline Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) Article Virtual and augmented (VAR) technology is in the early stages of being adopted as a teaching platform in higher education. The technology can facilitate immersive learning in environments that are not usually physically accessible to students via 3D models and interactive 360° videos. To date, adoption rates of VAR technology for teaching have not been well described across a higher education institution. Further, there is an absence of information on the optimal VAR laboratory designs and cost per student. In this study, a purpose designed virtual reality laboratory was formed in 2017 at The University of Sydney, housing 26 Oculus Rift headset units. An evaluation was conducted on the design, costs, rates of teaching adoption and student experiences over five teaching periods (2.5 years). Over this period, 4833 students were taught in the laboratory across 7952 student visits. The laboratory was used most by the Faculty of Engineering (53%), followed by the Faculty of Arts & Social Science (23.8%) and Faculty of Science (23.2%). For engineering, the units of study using the laboratory represented only 1.4% of annual faculty subjects offered. This confirms that adoption was in the initial stage of innovation diffusion. The laboratory saw a 250% increase in student numbers over the period of evaluation and 71.5% of students surveyed (n = 295) reported enhanced learning outcomes. The cost per visit was only AU$ 19.50. These findings give confidence to higher education institutions that the right VAR technology infrastructure is a sound educational investment for the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6. Springer US 2021-07-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8265284/ /pubmed/34257511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Marks, Benjy Thomas, Jacqueline Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title | Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title_full | Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title_fullStr | Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title_short | Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
title_sort | adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: an evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marksbenjy adoptionofvirtualrealitytechnologyinhighereducationanevaluationoffiveteachingsemestersinapurposedesignedlaboratory AT thomasjacqueline adoptionofvirtualrealitytechnologyinhighereducationanevaluationoffiveteachingsemestersinapurposedesignedlaboratory |