Cargando…

Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some K-12 schools resumed in-person classes with varying degrees of mitigation plans in the fall 2020. Physical distancing and face coverings can minimize SARS-CoV-2 spread, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, no research has focused on adherence to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camplain, Ricky, Lopez, Nanette V., Cooper, Dan M., McKenzie, Thomas L., Zheng, Kai, Radom-Aizik, Shlomit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.786
_version_ 1783720128516456448
author Camplain, Ricky
Lopez, Nanette V.
Cooper, Dan M.
McKenzie, Thomas L.
Zheng, Kai
Radom-Aizik, Shlomit
author_facet Camplain, Ricky
Lopez, Nanette V.
Cooper, Dan M.
McKenzie, Thomas L.
Zheng, Kai
Radom-Aizik, Shlomit
author_sort Camplain, Ricky
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some K-12 schools resumed in-person classes with varying degrees of mitigation plans in the fall 2020. Physical distancing and face coverings can minimize SARS-CoV-2 spread, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, no research has focused on adherence to mitigation strategies during school days. Thus, we sought to develop a systematic observation protocol to capture COVID-19 mitigation strategy adherence in school environments: The Systematic Observation of COVID-19 Mitigation (SOCOM). METHODS: We extended previously validated and internationally used tools to develop the SOCOM training and implementation protocols to assess physical-distancing and face-covering behaviors. SOCOM was tested in diverse indoor and outdoor settings (classrooms, lunchrooms, physical education [PE], and recess) among diverse schools (elementary, secondary, and special needs). RESULTS: For the unique metrics of physical-distancing and face-covering behaviors, areas with less activity and a maximum of 10–15 students were more favorable for accurately capturing data. Overall proportion of agreement was high for physical distancing (90.9%), face covering (88.6%), activity type (89.2%), and physical activity level (87.9%). Agreement was lowest during active recess, PE, and observation areas with ≥20 students. CONCLUSIONS: Millions of children throughout the USA are likely to return to school in the months ahead. SOCOM is a relatively inexpensive research tool that can be implemented by schools to determine mitigation strategy adherence and to assess protocols that allow students return to school safely and slow the spread of COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8267337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82673372021-07-09 Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools Camplain, Ricky Lopez, Nanette V. Cooper, Dan M. McKenzie, Thomas L. Zheng, Kai Radom-Aizik, Shlomit J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some K-12 schools resumed in-person classes with varying degrees of mitigation plans in the fall 2020. Physical distancing and face coverings can minimize SARS-CoV-2 spread, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, no research has focused on adherence to mitigation strategies during school days. Thus, we sought to develop a systematic observation protocol to capture COVID-19 mitigation strategy adherence in school environments: The Systematic Observation of COVID-19 Mitigation (SOCOM). METHODS: We extended previously validated and internationally used tools to develop the SOCOM training and implementation protocols to assess physical-distancing and face-covering behaviors. SOCOM was tested in diverse indoor and outdoor settings (classrooms, lunchrooms, physical education [PE], and recess) among diverse schools (elementary, secondary, and special needs). RESULTS: For the unique metrics of physical-distancing and face-covering behaviors, areas with less activity and a maximum of 10–15 students were more favorable for accurately capturing data. Overall proportion of agreement was high for physical distancing (90.9%), face covering (88.6%), activity type (89.2%), and physical activity level (87.9%). Agreement was lowest during active recess, PE, and observation areas with ≥20 students. CONCLUSIONS: Millions of children throughout the USA are likely to return to school in the months ahead. SOCOM is a relatively inexpensive research tool that can be implemented by schools to determine mitigation strategy adherence and to assess protocols that allow students return to school safely and slow the spread of COVID-19. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8267337/ /pubmed/34258031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.786 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Camplain, Ricky
Lopez, Nanette V.
Cooper, Dan M.
McKenzie, Thomas L.
Zheng, Kai
Radom-Aizik, Shlomit
Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title_full Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title_fullStr Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title_full_unstemmed Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title_short Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools
title_sort development of the systematic observation of covid-19 mitigation (socom): assessing face covering and distancing in schools
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8267337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.786
work_keys_str_mv AT camplainricky developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools
AT lopeznanettev developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools
AT cooperdanm developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools
AT mckenziethomasl developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools
AT zhengkai developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools
AT radomaizikshlomit developmentofthesystematicobservationofcovid19mitigationsocomassessingfacecoveringanddistancinginschools