Cargando…

Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)

Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simandan, Iosif-Daniel, Sava, Florinel, Buruiana, Angel-Theodor, Galca, Aurelian-Catalin, Becherescu, Nicu, Burducea, Ion, Mihai, Claudia, Velea, Alin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663
_version_ 1783720680143978496
author Simandan, Iosif-Daniel
Sava, Florinel
Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
Galca, Aurelian-Catalin
Becherescu, Nicu
Burducea, Ion
Mihai, Claudia
Velea, Alin
author_facet Simandan, Iosif-Daniel
Sava, Florinel
Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
Galca, Aurelian-Catalin
Becherescu, Nicu
Burducea, Ion
Mihai, Claudia
Velea, Alin
author_sort Simandan, Iosif-Daniel
collection PubMed
description Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and a deposition technique that combines MS and PLD, namely MSPLD. In the MSPLD technique, the same bulk target is used for sputtering but also for PLD at the same time. The structural and optical properties of the as-deposited and annealed thin films were characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray reflectometry, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. MS has the advantage of easily leading to fully amorphous films and to a single crystalline phase after annealing. MS also produces the highest optical contrast between the as-deposited and annealed films. PLD leads to the best stoichiometric transfer, whereas the annealed MSPLD films have the highest mass density. All the as-deposited films obtained with the three methods have a similar optical bandgap of approximately 0.7 eV, which decreases after annealing, mostly in the case of the MS sample. This study reveals that the properties of GST-225 are significantly influenced by the deposition technique, and the proper method should be selected when targeting a specific application. In particular, for electrical and optical phase change memories, MS is the best suited deposition method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8269865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82698652021-07-10 Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) Simandan, Iosif-Daniel Sava, Florinel Buruiana, Angel-Theodor Galca, Aurelian-Catalin Becherescu, Nicu Burducea, Ion Mihai, Claudia Velea, Alin Materials (Basel) Article Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and a deposition technique that combines MS and PLD, namely MSPLD. In the MSPLD technique, the same bulk target is used for sputtering but also for PLD at the same time. The structural and optical properties of the as-deposited and annealed thin films were characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray reflectometry, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. MS has the advantage of easily leading to fully amorphous films and to a single crystalline phase after annealing. MS also produces the highest optical contrast between the as-deposited and annealed films. PLD leads to the best stoichiometric transfer, whereas the annealed MSPLD films have the highest mass density. All the as-deposited films obtained with the three methods have a similar optical bandgap of approximately 0.7 eV, which decreases after annealing, mostly in the case of the MS sample. This study reveals that the properties of GST-225 are significantly influenced by the deposition technique, and the proper method should be selected when targeting a specific application. In particular, for electrical and optical phase change memories, MS is the best suited deposition method. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8269865/ /pubmed/34209141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simandan, Iosif-Daniel
Sava, Florinel
Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
Galca, Aurelian-Catalin
Becherescu, Nicu
Burducea, Ion
Mihai, Claudia
Velea, Alin
Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title_full Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title_fullStr Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title_short Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
title_sort influence of deposition method on the structural and optical properties of ge(2)sb(2)te(5)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663
work_keys_str_mv AT simandaniosifdaniel influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT savaflorinel influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT buruianaangeltheodor influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT galcaaureliancatalin influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT becherescunicu influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT burduceaion influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT mihaiclaudia influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5
AT veleaalin influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5