Cargando…
Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5)
Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663 |
_version_ | 1783720680143978496 |
---|---|
author | Simandan, Iosif-Daniel Sava, Florinel Buruiana, Angel-Theodor Galca, Aurelian-Catalin Becherescu, Nicu Burducea, Ion Mihai, Claudia Velea, Alin |
author_facet | Simandan, Iosif-Daniel Sava, Florinel Buruiana, Angel-Theodor Galca, Aurelian-Catalin Becherescu, Nicu Burducea, Ion Mihai, Claudia Velea, Alin |
author_sort | Simandan, Iosif-Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and a deposition technique that combines MS and PLD, namely MSPLD. In the MSPLD technique, the same bulk target is used for sputtering but also for PLD at the same time. The structural and optical properties of the as-deposited and annealed thin films were characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray reflectometry, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. MS has the advantage of easily leading to fully amorphous films and to a single crystalline phase after annealing. MS also produces the highest optical contrast between the as-deposited and annealed films. PLD leads to the best stoichiometric transfer, whereas the annealed MSPLD films have the highest mass density. All the as-deposited films obtained with the three methods have a similar optical bandgap of approximately 0.7 eV, which decreases after annealing, mostly in the case of the MS sample. This study reveals that the properties of GST-225 are significantly influenced by the deposition technique, and the proper method should be selected when targeting a specific application. In particular, for electrical and optical phase change memories, MS is the best suited deposition method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8269865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82698652021-07-10 Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) Simandan, Iosif-Daniel Sava, Florinel Buruiana, Angel-Theodor Galca, Aurelian-Catalin Becherescu, Nicu Burducea, Ion Mihai, Claudia Velea, Alin Materials (Basel) Article Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and a deposition technique that combines MS and PLD, namely MSPLD. In the MSPLD technique, the same bulk target is used for sputtering but also for PLD at the same time. The structural and optical properties of the as-deposited and annealed thin films were characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray reflectometry, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. MS has the advantage of easily leading to fully amorphous films and to a single crystalline phase after annealing. MS also produces the highest optical contrast between the as-deposited and annealed films. PLD leads to the best stoichiometric transfer, whereas the annealed MSPLD films have the highest mass density. All the as-deposited films obtained with the three methods have a similar optical bandgap of approximately 0.7 eV, which decreases after annealing, mostly in the case of the MS sample. This study reveals that the properties of GST-225 are significantly influenced by the deposition technique, and the proper method should be selected when targeting a specific application. In particular, for electrical and optical phase change memories, MS is the best suited deposition method. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8269865/ /pubmed/34209141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Simandan, Iosif-Daniel Sava, Florinel Buruiana, Angel-Theodor Galca, Aurelian-Catalin Becherescu, Nicu Burducea, Ion Mihai, Claudia Velea, Alin Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title | Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title_full | Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title_fullStr | Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title_short | Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge(2)Sb(2)Te(5) |
title_sort | influence of deposition method on the structural and optical properties of ge(2)sb(2)te(5) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8269865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14133663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simandaniosifdaniel influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT savaflorinel influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT buruianaangeltheodor influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT galcaaureliancatalin influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT becherescunicu influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT burduceaion influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT mihaiclaudia influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 AT veleaalin influenceofdepositionmethodonthestructuralandopticalpropertiesofge2sb2te5 |